Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction and the Periodic Table: a response to Scerri and Worrall

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a lengthy article E. Scerri and J. Worrall (2001) put forward the case for a novel ‘accommodationist’ version of the events surrounding the development of Mendeleef's Periodic Table 1869–1899. However these authors lay undue stress on the fact that President of the Royal Society of London Spottiswoode made absolutely no mention of Mendeleef's famous predictions in the Davy Medal eulogy in 1883 and undue stress on the fact that Cleve's classic 1879 Scandium paper contained an acknowledgement of Mendeleef's prior prediction of eka-boron.They also fail to analyse in any detail the so-called ‘rare earth problem’ which, in the opinion of this author, causes problems for their account but not for a predictivist account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Brauner, B.: 1882, ‘Contributions to the Chemistry of the Rare Earth Elements'’ Journal of the Chemical Society 41, 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G.: 1996, ‘The reception of Mendeleef's Periodic Law in America and Britain'’ Isis 87, 595–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G.: 1999, ‘Dynamics of Theory Change in Chemistry'’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 30, 21-79; 263-302. (a) p. 21, (b) pp. 291–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boisbaudran, L.: 1879a, ‘Nouelles raies spectrales observees dans le substances extraites de la samarskite'’ Comptes Rendus 88, 322–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boisbaudran, L.: 1879b, ‘Recherche de la samarium, radical d'une terre nouvelle extraite de la samarskite'’ Comptes Rendus 89, 212–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleve, P.T.: 1879a, ‘Sur le Scandium'’ Comptes Rendus 89, 419–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleve, P. T.: 1879b, ‘Sur deux nouveaux elements dans l'erbine'’ Comptes Rendus 89, 478–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeley, R. M.: 1893, ‘A New Diagram of the Periodic Table'’ Journal of the Chemical Society 63, 852–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. and Glymour, C.: 1978 ‘Einstein and Hilbert: Two months in the Theory of Relativity'’ Archives for the History of the Exact Sciences 19, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and Franklin, A.: 1991, ‘Maher, Mendeleev and Bayesianism'’ Philosophy of Science 58, 574–585, see p. 579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D. M.: 1970, Classical Scientific Papers. Chemistry. 2nd Series. London: Mills and Boon, pp 273 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D. M.: 1992, Ideas in Chemistry. A History of the Science. London: Athlone Press, pp. 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1978a, ‘History of Science and its rational reconstructions'’ in: Philosophical Papers Vol. One, pp. 109-138. Cambridge: University Press, 1978. 1978b, idem, Vol. Two, pp. 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P.: 1991, Inference to the best Explanation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leicester, H. M.: 1956, The Historical Background to Chemistry, New York: Dover, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, P.: 1988, ‘Prediction, Accommodation and the Logic of Discovery'’ PSA 88 Volume 1, 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marignac, J. C. G.: 1878, ‘Sur l'ytterbine, nouvelle terre contenue dans le gadolinite'’ Comptes Rendus 81, 578–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marignac, J. C. G.: 1880, ‘Sur les terres de la samarskite'’ Annales de Chimie et de Physique 20, 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleef, D. I.: 1869, article in Journal of the Russian Chemical Society 1, 60–77, 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleef, D. I.: 1871, article in Liebig's Annalen, Supplement VIII, 133–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleef. D. I.: 1879, ‘The Periodic Law of the Chemical Elements'’ Chemical News XL, no. 1042, 231 ff., 1879. Reprinted in Knight (1970) pp.273 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleef, D. I.: 1880a, Chemical News XLI, No 1055, 71–72. Reprinted in Knight, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleef, D. I.: 1880b, letter in Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 13, 1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleef, D. I.: 1881, ‘Mittheilungen’. Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 14, 2821–2831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W.: 1924, A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry Volume V. London: Longmans, p. 504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L.: 1880, letter in Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 13, 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, H. W. G.: 1913, article in Philosophical Magazine 26, 1024–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleship, R. L.: 1897, in: Lord Charnwood, editor, Lectures on the Republic of Plato, Second Edition, 1914. London: McMillan, p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilson, L. F. and Pettersson, O.: 1880, article in Berichte 13, 1459. Cited in van Spronsen, p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilson, L.: 1879, ‘Sur le Scandium, element nouveau'’ Comptes Rendus 88, 645–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, D. K., Laing J. D., and Rosenthal H.:1977: Prediction Analysis of Cross Classifications. New York: J. Wiley, (a) p.8, (b) p. 230, (c) pp. 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, A.: 1994, Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 2B, Bayesian Inference, First Edition, New York: Halstead Press, (a) 184–185, (b) 262–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, J. R.: 1964, A History of Chemistry: Volume 4, London: MacMillan, p. 894.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson, p 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1974, ‘Replies to my critics'’ in: P. A. Schilpp, editor, The Philosophy of Karl Popper Volume 2, Illinois: Open Court, p. 984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, E. J.: 1886, ‘A note on a method of illustrating the Periodic Table'’ Chemical News LN, No. 1388, 1–4. Reprinted in Knight (1970), pp. 317–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: 1994, ‘Prediction of the Nature of Hafnium'’ Annals of Science 51, 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: 1998, ‘Evolution of the Periodic System'’ Scientific American 279 (3), 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. and Worrall, J.: 2001, ‘Prediction and the Periodic Table'’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32A, 407–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spottiswoode, N.: 1879, ‘Presidential Address'’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 29, 407–431, see p. 429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spottiswode, N.: 1883, ‘Presidential Address'’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 34, 302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Spronsen, J. W.: 1969, The Periodic System of the Chemical Elements. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, A.: 1905, article in Berichte 38, 914. Cited in van Spronsen, p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1985, ‘Scientific Discoveries and Theory Confirmation'’ in: J. Pitt, editor, Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 301–332.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1989, ‘Fresnel, Poisson and the White Spot'’ in: D. Gooding et al., editors, The Uses of Experiment, pp. 135–156. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 135–156, see pp. 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. and Scerri, E.: 2001, ‘Prediction and the Periodic Table'’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32A, 407–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, E.: 1973, ‘Why did Einstein's Program supersede Lorentz's?'’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24, 95–123, 223–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akeroyd, F.M. Prediction and the Periodic Table: a response to Scerri and Worrall. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34, 337–355 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JGPS.0000005277.60641.ca

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JGPS.0000005277.60641.ca

Navigation