Skip to main content
Log in

Wobbling on a One-Legged Stool: The Decline of American Pluralism and the Academic Treatment of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

B. Readings (University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996) argued that universities have abandoned their original project of promoting a national culture and have tried to substitute by embracing “globalization,” but the vagueness and incoherence of the concept has failed to return purpose to the University. The academic treatment of corporate social responsibility illustrates this dilemma. For a generation after H.R. Bowen (Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row, 1953) founded the field, scholars struggled to fit the concept within a national system of pluralistic power-sharing among a variety of institutions that would define and enforce standards of responsibility necessary for the general good of American society. That understanding changed in the nineteen eighties, shortly after corporate executives had united to an unprecedented degree to direct the power of government in their interests, influence the public agenda, and roll back the power of unions. In response, business ethicists began to reformulate corporate social responsibility as a voluntary practice on the part of these same executives. Since the Kantian and Lockean principles upon which this approach was based were themselves problematic, it is not surprising that the experience gained over the last generation casts doubt on the efficacy of this reliance on voluntary restraint and personal initiative. However, circumstances that include the failure of globalization to deliver on its promises may have changed sufficiently in recent years to revive interest in approaches that acknowledge the importance of countervailing power for encouraging greater corporate social responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. (1977). Papers of John Adams, Vol I, p. 88, R. Taylor (Ed.). Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Jurist(1829). Manufacturing Corporations 2, 97-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshen, M. (1970). Changing the social contract: A role for business, Columbia Journal of World Business (November-December), 8-14.

  • Armstrong, P. (1988). Labour and monopoly capital. In R. Hyman & W. Streeck (Eds.), New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. & Silver, B.J. (1999). Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., Blinder, A. & Wolff, E. (2003). Downsizing: Its Causes and Consequences. Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Bennett, A. (1990). The Death of the Organization Man. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A. (2003, 1 December). Waking-up from the American dream: Dead-end jobs and the high cost of college could be choking off upward mobility, BusinessWeek, 54-56.

  • Black, S.E. & Lynch, L.M. (2001). How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity, Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 434-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1982). Beyond the Ivory Tower: Social Responsibilities of the Modern University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1978). Social responsibilities of the businessman: Twenty years later. In E. Epstein & E.D. Votaw (Eds.), Rationality, Legitimacy, Responsibility: Search for New Directions in Business and Society (pp. 116-130). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. (2000, 23 October). Why service stinks, Business Week, 118-128.

  • Brenner, R. (2002). The Boom and the Bubble. New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brofenbrenner, K. (1994). Employer behavior in certification elections and first contracts: Implications for labor law reform. In S. Friedman et al. (Eds.), Restoring the Promise of American Labor Law. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (1992). Elite policy planning networks in the United States. In Research in Politics and Society, Vol. 4 (pp.111-134). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week(2003, 1 December). This energy bill is a joke, 132.

  • Byers, G. (2002, May 23). Personal communication.

  • Calhoun, C. (1982). The Question of Class Struggle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (1999). One Billion Dollars for Ideas: Conservative Think Tanks in the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility, Business and Society 38, 268-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M. (2001). Threat effects of foreign direct investment on labor union wage premium, Working Paper# 27. Political Economy Research Institute.

  • Clark, L.H. (1976, 17 December). Rehabilitation project: Once-mighty CED panel of executives seeks a revival, offers advice to Carter, Wall Street Journal 38.

  • Clark, L.H. (1979, 11 December). Speaking of business, Wall Street Journal 24.

  • Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A. & Weller, M. (1998). Dollars and Votes: How Business Campaign Contributions Subvert Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A. (1984). The Threat: Inside the Soviet War Machine. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Economic Development (CED) (1971). Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations.New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Economic Development (1979). Redefining Government's Role in the Market System. New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlin, M. (1999, 27 December). What about us? Business Week, 52-56.

  • Conlin, M. (2001, 12 March). Revenge of the managers, Business Week, 60-62.

  • Cranston, M. (1957). John Locke: A Biography. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cypher, J. (2002, January/February). Return of the iron triangle, Dollars and Sense, 3-4.

  • Dale, E. (1960, March).Management must be made accountable, Harvard Business Review 60, 49-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960, Spring). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review 2, 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1967, Winter). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe to society? Business Horizons 10, 45-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, J.F. & Waller, D. (2003, 8 December). Can we afford this? Time Magazine,48-51.

  • Dodd, E.M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review 45,1145-1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, E.M. (1954). American Business Corporations until 1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G.W. (2001). Who Rules America? Power and Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T. (1999). Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. (2004). Riding the Dragon: Royal Dutch Shell and the Fossil Fire. Boston: Common Courage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, J. & Zuckerman, G. (2003, 23 September). Motorola's needs go beyond the CEO. Wall Street Journal, C1.

  • Dunfee, T.W. (1991). Business ethics and extant social contracts, Business Ethics Quarterly 1, 23-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Report of the President: Transmitted to Congress (2004). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Economist(2004, 17 January). Shell shock, 62.

  • Edsall, T.B. (1984). New Politics of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R.C. (1975). Stages in corporate stability and the risks of corporate failure. Journal of Economic History 35, 428-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. & Freeman, R. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, J. (1982). National Defense. New York: Knopf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, H.S. (2001). Job loss in the United States: 1981-1999, Working Paper #453. Princeton Department of Industrial Relations.

  • Ferguson, T. (1990, 26 June). Motorola aims high so Motorolans won't be getting high. Wall Street Journal, A19.

  • Ferguson, T. (1995). Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fram, A. (2003, 21 November). Foes of Bush OT rules abandon effort, Seattle Times.

  • Frederick, W.C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility, California Management Review 2, 54-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C. (1981). Free markets vs. social responsibility: Decision time at the CED, California Management Review 23, 20-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, S. (1978, 10 July). Hard times for labor. U.S. News and World Report, 23-24.

  • Gardner, J.M. (1995). Displaced Workers, 1991-1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerde, V.W. & Wokutch, R.E. (1998). 25 years and going strong, Business and Society 37, 414-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervasi, T. (1986). The Myth of Soviet Military Supremacy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. (1956). Dividends and Democracy. Larchmont: American Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. (2003, 20 February). Labor secretary's talk angers union leaders, New York Times, A20.

  • Grodinsky, J. (1957). Jay Gould: His Business Career. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, L. (1948). Economic Policy and Democratic Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heald, M. (1970). The Social Responsibilities of Business: Company and Community, 1900-1960. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, C.C. (1994). White Collar Blues: Management Loyalties in an Age of Corporate Restructuring. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, W.G. (1976). The Age of Plunder.London: Longman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.L. (1971). Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1980, Spring). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined, California Management Review, 59-67.

  • Jones, T.M. (1983). An integrating framework for research in business and society: A step toward the elusive paradigm? Academy of Management Review 8, 559-565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics, Academy of Management Review 20, 404-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.Y. (2003, 7 October). Motorola to spin off unit, Los Angeles Times, 3.

  • Jones, T.M. (2004, 9 March). Personal communication.

  • Jones, T.M. & Bowie, N.E. (1998, April). Moral hazards on the road to the 'virtual' corporation, Business Ethics Quarterly 8(2), 273-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1784). The nature of enlightenment. In R. Wines (1967), Enlightened Despotism, Reform or Reaction? (pp. 14-17). Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (2002, 17 April). Two oil giants deceived public on MTBE's hazards, jury finds, San Francisco Chronicle, A1.

  • Kaysen, C. (1957). Social significance of the modern corporation, American Economic Review 47(2), 311-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, N. (1996). Wild Blue Yonder. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, R. (1987). From Manor to Market: Structural Change in England, 1536-1640.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laham, N. (1996). A Lost Cause: Bill Clinton's Campaign for National Health Insurance. Westport, CT: Paeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (1992). Controlling the market for corporate control: The historical significance of managerial capitalism, Industrial and Corporate Change 1, 445-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1958, September/October). The dangers of social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 41-50.

  • Livesey, S.M. (2001). Eco-identity and discursive struggle: Royal Dutch Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria, Journal of Business Communication 38, 59-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1698/1967). Two Treatises on Government, P. Lassett (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2000, 13 August). Motorola accused of violating labor law, Taipei Times.

  • Lublin, J. (1998, 9 April). Pay for no performance, Wall Street Journal, R1.

  • Machlup, F. (1964, Summer). In defense of academic tenure, AAUP Bulletin 50, 112-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted (1996) in M.W. Finkin (Ed.), The Case for Tenure (pp. 9-27). Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, C.D. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R.H. (1978, July-August). Corporate support of education: Some strings attached. Harvard Business Review, 133-138.

  • Marens, R.S. (2003). Inventing corporate governance: The mid-century emergence of shareholder activism, Journal of Business and Management 8, 365-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, T. (1947). Humanist as Hero: Life and Times of Sir Thomas More.New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melman, S. (1984). The Permanent War Economy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D.Q. (1979, May-June). Flawed victory in labor law reform, Harvard Business Review, 92-99.

  • Mishel, L., Bernstein, J. & Schmitt, J. (2001). The State of Working America.Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, O. (2000, 4 June). One out, all out fallout, The Observer, 2.

  • Murray, D. & Mahr, J. (2003, 7 December). Resistance to business regulation paved way for accounting scandal, Toledo Blade, 1.

  • Neeson, J.M. (1996). Commoners: Common Rights, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (Ed.). (1996). Broken Ladders: Managerial Careers in the New Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palley, T. (1998). Plenty of Nothing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, N. (2003, 21 July). Massive public subsidies: Going, going, Boeing, Seattle Times.

  • Picketty, T. & Saez, E. (2003). Income equality in the United States (updated 1913-2001).Working Paper #8467. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J., Wade, J. & Pollock, T. (1999). Industry categories and the politics of the comparable firm in CEO compensation, Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 112-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. (1982). English Society in the Eighteenth Century. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J., Preston, L. & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Palo Alto: Stanford Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Readings, B. (1996). University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, C.J. (1995). The seventeenth century revolution in the English land law, Cleveland State Law Review 43, 221-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea, H.C. (1972, 24 January). The American security council, The Nation, 113-116.

  • Rosenblum, J.D. (1998). Copper Crucible: How the Arizona Miners' Strike of 1983 Recast Labor Management Relations in America. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2002). The Follies of Globalization Theory. New York: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbush, S. (2003, 24 March). Now it's really space war, Business Week, 81.

  • Roy, W. (1997). Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, J. (1986). The Labouring Classes in Early Industrial England. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushefsky, M.E. & Patel, K. (1998). Politics, Power and Policy Making: the Case of Health Care Reform in the 1990s.Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (1995). Company Man: The Rise and Fall. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J.W. (1983). Peddlers of Crisis: Committee on the Present Danger and the Politics of Containment.Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, G. (2000, 20 December). Government issues guide on contractors, Washington Post, A33.

  • Schrecker, E. (1986). No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E. (2000, 27 December). Raw deals, Wall Street Journal, A1.

  • Seavoy, R. (1982). Origins of the American Business Corporation, 1784-1855. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selekman, B. (1958, January-February). Is management creating a class society? Harvard Business Review, 37-46.

  • Smith, V. (1990). Managing in the Corporate Interest: Control and Resistance in an American Bank. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, C.J. (1994). Winners and losers in industrial recruitment: Mercedes Benz and Alabama, State and Local Government Review 26, 192-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. (1979). Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. NewYork: Smith Peter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P. (1973, 15 November). Galbraith's Utopia, New York Review of Books, 3-6.

  • Uchitelle, L. (1996, 10 December). Inside America: Altered states in the office, New York Times, 12.

  • Uchitelle, L. (2003, 10 November). State pays for jobs, but it doesn't always pay off, New York Times, A1.

  • Useem, J. (2003, 28 April). Have they no shame? Fortune Magazine, 57-63.

  • Useem, M. (1983). The rise of corporate politics and the decline of academic freedom. In C. Kaplan & E. Schrecker (Eds.), Regulating the Intellectuals (pp. 99-117). New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. (1993). Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1996). Kindred Strangers: The Uneasy Relationship between Business and Politics in America.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal(2003, 11 April). The race to rebuild Iraq: U.S. firms angle to get piece of the action, B1.

  • Walsh, M.W. (2003, 31 December). Corporate pensions face pressures despite rally, New York Times, 1.

  • Wartick, S.L. & Cochran, P.L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model, Academy of Management Review 10, 758-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.H. (1991). Adam Smith and his Legacy for Modern Capitalism.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1996). Corporation as political actor. In C. Kaysen (Ed.), The American Corporation Today. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (1984). Rise and Fall of the Soviet Threat. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. (2002). Top Heavy: The Increasing Inequality of Wealth in America and What Can Be Done about It. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N. (1984). John Locke and Agrarian Capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. (2002). A review of earnings restatements. Working Paper. Softrax.

  • Yeomans, M. (2003, 2May). Genesis to boost production at area plant, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marens, R. Wobbling on a One-Legged Stool: The Decline of American Pluralism and the Academic Treatment of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Academic Ethics 2, 63–87 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039008.46810.32

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039008.46810.32

Navigation