Skip to main content
Log in

The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business ethics attracts increasing attention from business practitioners and academic researchers. Concerns over fraudulent behavior keep attentionfocused on ethics in businesses. The accounting profession pays particularattention to matters of ethical judgment. The profession has adopted a strictcode of conduct and many states require the passage of an ethics exam to gaincertification. The more that is understood about the relationship of gender and ethics, the better chance of education and training programs will bedesigned to improve ethical awareness and sensitivity. Prior studies have found that personal characteristics are an important aspect of cultural norms.This study analyzes the responses of students from eight different countries toquestions on their probable actions to an ethical dilemma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ameen, E., D. Guffey and J. McMillan: 1996, ‘Gender Differences in Determining the Ethical Sensitivity of Future Accounting Professionals’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. Shepherd: 1989, ‘Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. and Y. Ugras: 1998, ‘Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1117–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyacigiller, N. and N. Adler: 1991, ‘The Parochial Dinosaur: The Organizational Sciences in a Global Context’, Academy of Management Review 16, 262–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, P., J. Kohls and K. Anderson: 1991, ‘The Challenge of Global Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 767–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.: 2000, ‘The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1,500 Articles Published in Journal of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 26, 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J., J. Kantor and I. Greenberg: 1994, ‘Possible Ethical Issues and Their Impact on the Firm: Perceptions Held by Public Accountants’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 919–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. and R. Welton: 1991, ‘Professional Ethics: Business Students' Perceptions’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L.: 1995, ‘Women and Men, Morality and Ethics’, Business Horizons, 61–68.

  • Ekin, M., G. Serap and S. Tezolmez: 1999, ‘Business Ethics in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation with Special Emphasis on Gender’, Journal of Business Ethics 18, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. and L. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, S. and H. Stephenson: 1993, ‘Decision Rules Used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgements: Another Look’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In A Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.: 1989, ‘Ethical Values and Decision Processes of Male and Female Business Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. and C. Sutton: 1995, ‘Unravelling the Ethical Decision-making Process: Clues from an Empirical Study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J.: 1998, ‘Are Women Really More Ethical Than Men? Maybe it depends on the Situation’, Journal of Managerial Issues 10, 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstedde, G.: 1980, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Business of Macromarketing 6, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. and M. Kavanaugh: 1996, ‘An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 511–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazanchi, D.: 1995, ‘Unethical Behavior in Information Systems: The Gender Factor’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1984, ‘The Psychology of Moral Development’, in Essays on Moral Development, Volume 2 (Harper and Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.: 1995, ‘Ethics of Business Students: Some Marketing Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdale, C.: 1983, Moral Orientations and Moral Development: The Analysis of Care and Justice Reasoning Across Different Dilemmas in Females from Childhood to Adulthood. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Luthar, H., R. DiBattista and T. Gautschi: 1997, ‘Perception of What Ethical Climate is and What it Should Be’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N.: 1983, ‘The Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality’, Harvard Educational Review 53, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, K. and J. Bailey: 1999, ‘The Effects of Transgressor Sex on Judgements of Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 18, 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, C. and K. Berger: 1996, ‘Undergraduate Attitudes About Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. and P. Mudrack: 1997, ‘Do Complex Moral Reasoners Experience Greater Ethical Work Conflict?’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1311–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy and B. Peery: 1996, ‘Selected Individual Differences and Collegians' Ethical Beliefs’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, C. and T. Zimmerer: 1985, ‘Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes’, Journal of Business Ethics 4, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, L., G. Peek and M. Horras: 1994, ‘Enhancing Arthur Andersen Business Ethics Vignettes: Group Discussions Using Cooperative/Collaborative Learning Techniques’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(4), 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorsoltan, K., S. Amin and A. Tootoonchi: 1991, ‘Business Ethics: Views of Future Leaders’, Advanced Management Journal, 4–9.

  • Prasad, J., N. Marlow and R. Hattwick: 1998, ‘Gender-Based Differences in Perception of a Just Society’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. and K. Mitra: 1998, ‘The Effects of Individual Difference Factors on the Acceptability of Ethical and Unethical Workplace Behaviors’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1581–1593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxas, M. and J. Stoneback: 1997, ‘An Investigation of the Ethical Decision-Making Process Across Varying Cultures’, The International Journal of Accounting 32(4), 503–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegger, D. and E. King: 1992, ‘A Study of the Effect of Age and gender upon Student Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwinek, P.: 1992, ‘Demographic and Related Differences in Ethical Views Among Small Businesses’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 555–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M., D. Finn and P. Munter: 1993, ‘The Effect of Auditor's Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Ethical Sensitivity’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 5, 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikula, A. and A. Costa: 1994, ‘Are Women More Ethical Than Men’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 859–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. and E. Oakley: 1997, ‘Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students' Implications for Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanga, K. and R. Turpen: 1991, ‘Ethical Judgements on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F.: 1994, Riding the Waves of Culture (Irwin, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J. and M. Ortiz-Buonafina: 1990, ‘Ethical Beliefs' Differences of Males and Females’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorherr, P. H., J. A. Patrick, James F. Quinn and Thomas J. Brady: 1995, ‘The Impact of Gender and Major on Ethical Perceptions of Business Students: Management Implications for the Accounting Profession’, Journal of Academy of Business Administration (Spring), 46–66.

  • Weeks, W., C. Moore, J. McKinney and J. Longnecker: 1999, ‘The Effects of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment’, Journal of Business Ethics 20, 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, Thomas W. and Dominic F. Swords: 1992, ‘Business Ethics Judgments: A Cross-Cultural Comparison’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Louis P. and Melanie J. Rhodeback: 1992, ‘Ethical Dilemmas in Organization Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 663–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D.: 1972, The Changing Values on Campus: Personal and Political Attitudes of Today's College Students (Simon and Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roxas, M.L., Stoneback, J.Y. The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 50, 149–165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022127.51047.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022127.51047.ef

Navigation