Skip to main content
Log in

Local community attitudes to wildlife utilisation in the changing economic and social context of Mongolia

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years illegal hunting has increased in Mongolia, putting considerable pressure on large mammals populations. The causes for this phenomenon lie in increasing rural poverty, ineffective policies to regulate hunting, as well as a ready market for many wildlife products in the Chinese medicine markets of east Asia. It is now accepted that biodiversity is ultimately lost or conserved at the local level and it is therefore imperative that the perspectives of the local people are better understood if wildlife management programmes are to be sustainable. This research uses a ‘grounded theory’ approach to investigate local community attitudes to wildlife utilisation and to explore what local people consider as a sustainable wildlife management strategy in remoter regions of Mongolia. The findings clearly suggest that the current situation is not conducive to sustainability either of wildlife populations or human livelihoods. Important changes are needed if sustainability is to be achieved, including alterations to property rights, greater government support, and improved marketing skills and employment opportunities from wildlife. Linked to all of the above points is the need to address the serious information deficit experienced in rural Mongolia to enable local people to examine critically the issues at hand and to participate actively in solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADFAT (Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) 2000. Mongolia Country Fact Sheet. 12 December 2000 found on the web at http: //www.dfat.gov.au/geo/mongolia/index.html (accessed on 03/03/01).

  • Becker P.H. 1993. Common pitfalls in published grounded theory research. Qualitative Health Research 3: 254–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley D.W. 1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch C. 1995. Mongolia's Wild Heritage. In collaboration with the Mongolian Ministry of Nature and Environment.

  • Glaser B.G. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B.G. and Strauss A. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway P., Storey R. and Lafitte G. 1997. Mongolia Lonely Planet Series. Craft Print Pte Ltd., Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highley K. and Highley S.C. 2000. Bear Farming and Trade in China and Taiwan. Found on the web at http: / /www.earthtrust.com/ bear.html (accessed on 13/08/01).

  • Hulme D. and Murphree M. 2001. African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. Heinemann, Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFFN 2000. Community-based Wildfire Management in Mongolia.IFFN No. 23-December 2000, pp. 57–60. Found on the web at http: //www.uni-freiburg.de/fireglobe/iffn/country/mn/mn 10.html-(accessed on 07/08/01).

  • Inamdar A., Brown D. and Cobb S. 1999. What's Special About Wildlife Management in Forests? Concepts and Models of Rights-Based Management, With Recent Evidence from west-Central Africa. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives no. 44, June 1999.

  • Mainka S.A. and Mills J.A. 1995. Wildlife and traditional Chinese medicine-supply and demand for wildlife species. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicines 26: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills J.A., Can S. and Ishihara A. 1995. The Bear Facts: The East Asian Market for Bear Gall Bladder. A TRAFFIC Network report found on http: //www.tibet.net/eng/diir/enviro/species/database/traf-ficb/index.html (accessed on 15/08/01).

  • MNE (Ministry of Nature and the Environment) 1998. Biological Diversity in Mongolia. MNE & UNDP Publication, Ulaan Baatar, Mongolia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert M. and Pretty J. 1995. Parks, People and Professionals: Putting Participation into Protected Area Management. UNRISD, IIED, WWF, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack R.B. 1993. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana P.B. 1995. Reform Strategies in Transitional Economies: Lessons From Asia. World Development 23: 1157–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soo Kuen Ing 1999. The Social Conditions of Wildfire in Mongolia. IFFN no. 21-September 1999, pp. 75–80. Found on the web at http: //www.uni-freiburg.de/fireglobe/iffn/country/mn/mn 10.html-(accessed on 23/08/01).

  • Strauss A. and Corbin J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • 't Sas-Rolfes M. 1998. Who Will Save The Wild Tiger? Political Economic Research Centre. http://www.perc.org/ps12.htm (accessed on 13/08/01).

  • UNDP 2000. Mongolia's Wild Heritage. http://www.un-mongolia.mn/wildher/hentii.htm (accessed on 24/11/00).

  • Williams M. 2000. Bone of Tiger, Bile of Bear. The Wild East: Traditional Chinese Medicine and Conservation. Found on the web at http://martinwilliams.tripod.com/tcmandcons/boneoftiger.html (accessed on 13/08/01).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.C. Macmillan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pratt, D., Macmillan, D. & Gordon, I. Local community attitudes to wildlife utilisation in the changing economic and social context of Mongolia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 591–613 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000009492.56373.cc

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000009492.56373.cc

Navigation