Skip to main content
Log in

On Peres' Statement “Opposite Momenta Lead to Opposite Directions,” Decaying Systems and Optical Imaging

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We re-examine Peres' statement “opposite momenta lead to opposite directions”. It will be shown that Peres' statement is only valid in the large distance or large time limit. In the short distance or short time limit an additional deviation from perfect alignment occurs due to the uncertainty of the location of the source. This error contribution plays a major role in Popper's orginal experimental proposal. Peres' statement applies rather to the phenomenon of optical imaging, which was regarded by him as a verification of his statement. This is because this experiment can in a certain sense be seen as occurring in the large distance limit. We will also reconsider both experiments from the viewpoint of Bohmian mechanics. In Bohmian mechanics particles with perfectly opposite momenta will move in opposite directions. In addition it will prove particularly useful to use Bohmian mechanics because the Bohmian trajectories coincide with the conceptual trajectories drawn by Pittman et al. In this way Bohmian mechanics provides a theoretical basis for these conceptual trajectories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. K. Popper, Naturwissenschaften 22, 807(1934).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, (Hutchinson, London 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Popper in Open Questions in Quantum Physics, Tarozzi G. and A. van der Merwe, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht 1985),p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Peres, Stud. History Philos. Modern Phys. 33, 23(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. J. Collett and R. Loudon, Nature 328, 675(1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. J. Short, Found. Phys. Lett. 14, 275(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. H. Kim, Y. Shih, Found. Phys. 29, 1849(1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. B. Pittman, Y. H. Shih, D. V. Strekalov and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3429(1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Peres, Am. J. Phys. 68, 991(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166(1952).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 180(1952).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2465(1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles (Springer, New York 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Nogami, F. M. Toyama, and W. van Dijk, Phys. Lett. A 270, 279(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. DÝrr, S. Goldstein, and N. ZanghÍ, J. Stat. Phys. 67, 843(1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. R. Holland, Phys. Rep. 224, 95(1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Bohm and B.J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe (Routledge, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. N. Kaloyerou, Phys. Rep. 244, 288(1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Struyve, W. De Baere, J. De Neve, and S. De Weirdt, quant-ph/0311098, Phys. Lett. A. in press.

  20. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. W. Hawkes and E. Kasper, Principles of Electron Optics, Vols. I, II, and III (Academic, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. A. Khan and R. Jagannathan, Phys. Rev. E 51, 2510(1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. R. Holland, The Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, Found. Phys. 14, 255(1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. V. Strekalov, A. V. Sergienko, D. N. Klyshko and Y. H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600(1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Struyve.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Struyve, W., De Baere, W., De Neve, J. et al. On Peres' Statement “Opposite Momenta Lead to Opposite Directions,” Decaying Systems and Optical Imaging. Foundations of Physics 34, 963–985 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000034224.37659.96

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000034224.37659.96

Navigation