An Economic Analysis of Leniency Programs in Antitrust Law
- Jeroen Hinloopen
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
Within a dynamic market environment the forces that drive the effectiveness of leniency programs in antitrust law are analyzed. This effectiveness unambigously is enhanced by (i) increasing the reduction in fine payments in return for reporting a cartel, and (ii) increasing the expected per-period cartel detection probability for any (future) period. Increasing fine payments for violating antitrust law also enhances the programs' effectiveness provided that the reduction in fine payment in return for reporting is large enough. The effectiveness of leniency programs is not influenced by the length of the period of limitation that comes with violating antitrust laws.
- Abreu, D. (1986) Extremal Equilibria of Oligopolistic Super games. Journal of Economic Theory 39: pp. 191-225
- Becker, G. S. (1968) Crime and Punishment: an Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: pp. 169-217
- Bhaskar, V., Obara, I. (2002) Belief-based Equilibria in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma with Private Monitoring. Journal of Economic Theory 102: pp. 40-69
- Commission Notice on the Non-Imposition or Reduction of Fines in Cartel Cases. Official Journal of the European Communities 207: pp. 4-6
- Commission Notice on Immunity from Fines and Reduction of Fines in Cartel Cases. Official Journal of the European Communities 45: pp. 3-5
- Friedman, J. W. (1971) A Non-Cooperative Equilibrium for Super games. Review of Economic Studies 38: pp. 1-12
- Ghosal, V., Gallo, J. (2001) The Cyclical Behavior of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Enforcement Activity. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19: pp. 27-54
- Hammond, S. D. 2000, Detecting and Deterring Cartel Activity through an Effective Leniency Program, speech delivered before the International Workshop on Cartels, Brighton, England, November.
- Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., Green, J. R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Hinloopen, J. 2003, ‘Cartel Stability with Time-dependent Detection Probabilities,’ (March) 2003, http://www.fee.uva.nl/io/jhinloopen.
- Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R. (2002) In Support of Trigger Strategies: Experimental Evidence from Two-Person Non-Cooperative Games. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 11: pp. 685-716
- Motta, M., Polo, M. (2003) Leniency Programs and Cartel Prosecution. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21: pp. 347-380
- Mueller, D. C. (1996) Lessons from the United States' Antitrust History. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14: pp. 415-446
- Fighting Hard-core Cartels; Harm, Effective Sanctions and Leniency Programs. OECD, Paris
- Peña Castellot, M. A. (2001) An Overview of the Application of the Leniency Notice. EC Competition Policy Newsletter 1: pp. 11-15
- Polinsky, A. M., Shavell, S. (2000) The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law. Journal of Economic Literature XXXVIII: pp. 45-76
- Rey, P. 2001, ‘Towards a Theory of Competition Policy,’ IDEI, Toulouse University, http://www.idei.asso.fr/French/FCv/CvChercheurs/Rey.html.
- Segerstrom, P. S. (1988) Demons and Repentance. Journal of Economic Theory 45: pp. 32-52
- United States Department of Justice 2001, Antitrust Division Manual third edition revised.
- Title
- An Economic Analysis of Leniency Programs in Antitrust Law
- Journal
-
De Economist
Volume 151, Issue 4 , pp 415-432
- Cover Date
- 2003-12-01
- DOI
- 10.1023/B:ECOT.0000006592.62377.60
- Print ISSN
- 0013-063X
- Online ISSN
- 1572-9982
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Topics
- Keywords
-
- cartel stability
- leniency program
- time-dependent detection probabilities
- Industry Sectors
- Authors
-
- Jeroen Hinloopen (1)
- Author Affiliations
-
- 1. adres University of Amsterdam (and Tinbergen Institute) and Economics Network for Competition and Regulation (ENCORE), The Netherlands