Skip to main content
Log in

New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the Green Paper presented by the European Commission in July 2001, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis” (Commission of the European Communities, 2001b, p. 6). On this basis, in 2002, the Italian Government, and especially the Italian Ministry of Welfare, launched an initiative called CSR-SC (social commitment) in order to foster the proactive social role of Italian enterprises, with great attention on SME involvement. The technical partner of the Italian Ministry of Welfare for this initiative is Bocconi University. The goal of this contribution is to present the main results of CSR–SC research project developed by Bocconi University. The paper provides a detailed picture of the general scheme designed to carry out the research project and a review of the different methodologies used to support the solutions proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzone, G., R. Bianchi and G. Noci: 1997, ‘Implementing Environmental Certification in Italy: Managerial and Competitive Implications for Firms’, Eco-Management and Auditing 4, 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G.: 1987, Mercato e Forze Locali: Il Distretto Industriale (il Mulino, Bologna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper and Brothers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society 38(3), 268–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • CELE (Centre for Ethics, Law & Economics): 2002, The Q-RES Project: The Quality of the Social and Ethical Responsibility of Corporations. Guidelines for Management (Università Cattaneo, Castellanza).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2001a, ‘A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development’, COM (2001) 264 final, Brussels.

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2001b, ‘Green Paper “Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility”’, COM (2001) 366 final, Brussels.

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2002a, ‘European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility’, Observatory of European SMEs, Luxembourg, No. 4.

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2002b, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development’, COM(2002) 347 final, Brussels.

  • Drucker, P. F.: 1984, ‘Converting Social Problems into Business Opportunities: The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 26(2), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 1997, Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone Publishing, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Officer Association: 2002, ‘Developing a Business Conduct Guidelines Standard’, in G. Brenkert (ed.), Proceedings of the Transatlantic Business Ethics Conference (Georgetown University, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September.

  • GBS (Gruppo di Studio per il Bilancio Sociale): 2001, I Principi di Redazione del Bilancio Sociale (GBS, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni, A. (ed.): 2000, Health, Safety & Environment. Indirizzi strategici e problematiche operative (Egea, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2002, 2002 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, http://www.globalreporting.org.

  • Goodman, E., J. Bamford and J. Saynor (eds.): 1989, Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R.

  • N.hriaandA.Zaheer: 2000, ‘Strategic Networks’, Strategic Management Journal 21(special issue), 203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • ISEA: 1999, AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000) Framework. Standard, Guidelines and Professional Qualification (ISEA, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISEA: 2003, AA1000 Assurance Standard, http:// www.accountability.org.uk.

  • ISO: 1996, ISO 14001: Environmental Management Systems — Specification with Guidance for Use (ISO, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B. E. and D. Payne: 2002, ‘Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 41, 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, S., M. Calcaterra and F. Perrini (eds.): 2001, Etica, Finanza e Valore d'Impresa (Egea, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B.: 2001, Intangibles. Management, Measurement, and Reporting (Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., K. Cook and R. S. Burt (eds.): 2001, Social Capital. Theory and Research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, A.: 2002, La Gestione Strategica del Capitale Intellettuale e del Capitale Sociale (il Mulino, Bologna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, A. and A. Lomi: 1999, ‘Interorganizational Relations in the Modena Biomedical Industry: A Case Study in Local Economic Development’, in A. Grandori (ed.), Interfirm Networks. Organization and Industrial Competitiveness (Routledge, London), pp. 120–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D. and M. Tuffrey: 1999, Companies in Communities: Valuing the Contribution, (Charities Aid Foundation, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, R. W. and B. Weinstein: 2000, ‘Beyond Shareholder Value — Reconciling the Shareholder and Stakeholder Perspectives’, Journal of General Management 25(3), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal: 1998, ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., P. Raynard and S. Zadek: 1996, Social Auditing for Small Organisations (New Economics Foundation, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. (ed.): 2002, Responsabilità Sociale dell'Impresa e Finanza Etica (Egea, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. and A. Tencati: 2002, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: the Proposal for a New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Framework’, in Proceedings of the 5th Annual Corporate Citizenship Unit Research Conference (University of Warwick, Warwick).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. and A. Tencati: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Managing Sustainability and the Need of a New Corporate Evaluation and Reporting System in a Knowledge Economy’, Paper presented at the 2003 Academy of Management Conference, Seattle, Washington.

  • Perrini, F., M. Calcaterra, S. Pogutz and A. Tencati: 2002, ‘Research Project for the Italian Ministry of Welfare. Proposal for a CSR-SC Standard’, in Proceedings of the Conference ‘L'Impegno Sociale delle Imprese per un Nuovo Welfare’ (Bocconi University, Milan), http://www.welfare.gov.it.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogutz, S. and A. Tencati: 1998, ‘Il Bilancio Ambientale: Strumento di Controllo e Comunicazione’, in Proceedings of the Conference ‘Ambiente e Competitività’ (Bocconi University, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review (December), 5–16.

  • SEAN: 2000, Il Bilancio Sociale: uno Strumento per Valorizzare l'Impresa (KPMG, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A.: 1999, ‘Etica e Responsabilità Ambientale dell'Impresa. La Misurazione della Performance Ecologica dell'Azienda: il Bilancio Sociale e il Bilancio Ambientale’, in L. M. Alfieri and M. L. Fornaciari Davoli (eds.), Etica ed Economia (Mucchi, Modena), pp. 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A.: 2002a, Sostenibilità, Impresa e Performance. Un Nuovo Modello di Evaluation and Reporting (Egea, Milan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A.: 2002b, ‘Managing Sustainability’, in Zsolnai L. (ed.), Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics (Peter Lang Academic Publisher, Oxford and Bern), pp. 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Copenhagen Centre: 1998, The Vision Behind The Copenhagen Centre, http://www.copenhagencentre. org.

  • The European Parliament and the Council: 2001, ‘Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of 19 March 2001 Allowing Voluntary Participation by Organizations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)’, Official Journal of the European Communities L 114, (24 April), pp. 1–29.

  • The SIGMA Project: 2003, The SIGMA Guidelines. Putting Sustainable Development into Practice — A Guide for Organisations, http://www.projectsigma.com.

  • Unioncamere and ISVI (Istituto per i Valori d'Impresa): 2003, L'Impegno Sociale delle Piccole e Medie Imprese Italiane, http://www.isvi.org.

  • United Nations Commission on Human Rights — Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: 2003, ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights’, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 13 August.

  • WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development): 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility. Meeting Changing Expectations, http://www.wbcsd. org.

  • Weiser, J. and S. Zadek: 2000, Conversations with Disbelievers. Persuading Companies to Address Social Challenges (The Ford Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S., P. Pruzan and R. Evans (eds.): 1997, Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting (Earthscan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • 01.htm}.

  • Zsolnai, L.: 2002, ‘New Agenda for Business Ethics’, in L. Zsolnai (ed.), Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics (Peter Lang Academic Publisher, Oxford and Bern), pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tencati, A., Perrini, F. & Pogutz, S. New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 173–190 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039407.37497.44

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039407.37497.44

Navigation