Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper's purpose is to assess how management's perceptions regarding certain aspects of environmental reporting relate to the firm's actual reporting strategy. Toward that end, we propose a model where a firm's environmental disclosure is conditional upon executive assessments of corporate concerns. The study relies on a survey that was sent to environmental management executives from European and North American multinational firms enquiring about the determinants of corporate environmental disclosure. Responses from these executives were then contrasted with their firms' actual environmental reporting practices, which was measured using a comprehensive multi-criteria grid. Results show that there is a relationship between environmental managers' attitudes toward various stakeholder groups and how those managers respond to the stakeholders via the decision to disclose and the actual disclosures made. Our model provides a perspective as to how a firm responds to the numerous stakeholders to whom it must be accountable. This accountability in turn relates to how the company communicates its actions to society in order to achieve or maintain its social legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agle, B. R., R. K. Mitchell and J. A. Sonnenfeld: 1999, 'Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values', Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 507-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha and T. M. Jones: 1999, 'Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 488-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. N. and P. L. Cochran: 1991, 'The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research', in J. F. Mahon (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (Sundance, UT), pp. 449-467.

  • Brown, N. and C. Deegan: 1998, 'The Public Disclosure of Environmental Performance Information-A Dual Test of Media Agenda Setting Theory and Legitimacy Theory', Accounting and Business Research 29(1), 21-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, N.: 1998, 'Environmental Performance, Legislation and Annual Report Disclosure: The Case of Acid Rain and Falconbridge', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 11(2), 163-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. and I. M. Gordon: 2001, 'An Examination of Social and Environmental Reporting Strategies', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(5), 587-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. and M. Magnan: 1997, 'Investors' Assessment of Implicit Environmental Liabilities: An Empirical Investigation', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16(2), 215-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. and M. Magnan: 1999, 'Corporate Environmental Disclosure Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits', Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 14(4), 429-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D. and M. Magnan: 2003, 'Environmental Reporting Management: A European Perspective', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(1), 43-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, 'The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J. and J. Pfeffer: 1975, 'Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior', Pacific Sociological Review 18(1), 122-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fédération des experts comptables européens: 1999, 'Towards a Generally Accepted Framework for Environmental Reporting', FEE Discussion Paper, Brussels.

  • Freedman, M. and B. Jaggi: 1992, 'An Investigation of the Long-run Relationship between Pollution Performance and Economic Performance: The Case of Pulp and Paper Firms', Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3, 315-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon: 1997, 'The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Results', Business & Society 36(1), 5-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995, 'Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2), 47-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurthrie, J. and L. D. Parker: 1989, 'Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory', Accounting and Business Research 19(76), 343-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B. and A. Schaefer: 2001, 'Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of UK Water and Electricity Utilities', Journal of Business Ethics 30(3), 243-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky: 1999, 'The Relationship between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance', Academy of Management Journal 42(1), 87-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogner, R. H.: 1982, 'Corporate Social Reporting: Eight Decades of Development at U.S. Steel', Research in Corporate Performance and Policy 4, 243-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. B., A. Anderson and S. Golden: 2001, 'Corporate Environmental Disclosures: Are They Useful in Determining Environmental Performance', Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20(3), 217-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W.: 1998, 'Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations', Journal of Business Ethics 17(6), 643-651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Greening: 1999, 'The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership on Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 564-576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, L. D. and G. E. Fryxell: 1994, 'CEO Stakeholder Attitudes and Corporate Social Activity in the Fortune 500', Business and Society 33(1), 58-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, D. S. R. and D. H. Thain: 1997, Making Boards Work (McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B.: 1992, 'Information Disclosure Strategy', California Management Review 34(4), 9-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F.: 1985, Organizational Behavior (McGraw-Hill: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M. R.: 1997, 'Towards a Mega-Theory of Accounting', Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting 4(2), 273-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, D., H. Warsame and K. Pedwell: 1998, 'Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports', Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3), 265-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. M.: 1992, 'Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory', Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5), 471-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. J. and M. Welker: 2001, 'Social Disclosure, Financial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital', Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(7), 597-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. W.: 1992, 'Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory', Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6), 595-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J.: 1762/1975, 'The Social Contract', reprinted in L. J. Seidler and L. L. Seidler (eds.), Social Accounting: Theory, Issues and Cases (Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles), pp. 43-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T. J.: 1997, 'Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences', Academy of Management Journal 22(4), 887-910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar, R. M. Brown, J. J. Janney and K. Paul: 2001, 'An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective', Journal of Business Ethics 32(2), 143-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, A. D. and S. P. Sethi: 1974, 'An Approach to Incorporating Social Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies, in S. P. Sethi (ed.), The Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society (Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles), pp. 67-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmshurst, T. D. and G. R. Frost: 2000, 'Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Test of Legitimacy Theory', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 13(1), 10-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D. G., P. Edwards and F. Birkin: 1996, 'Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision', British Journal of Management 7(4), 329-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D.: 1995, 'Do Corporations Award CEO Stock Options Effectively?' Journal of Financial Economics 39(2, 3), 237-269.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cormier, D., Gordon, I.M. & Magnan, M. Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality. Journal of Business Ethics 49, 143–165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015844.86206.b9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015844.86206.b9

Navigation