Skip to main content
Log in

Why is Corruption Tolerated?

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is maintained that a closer analysis of the features of the underlying contract reveals that under many circumstances corruption is in fact a rational and understandable reaction to institutional failures, which are often far from accidental. Sometimes it can even be considered legitimate, when instrumental in achieving goals shared by the vast majority of the electorate.

To this purpose, three different stylized institutional frameworks are analyzed: developed, totalitarian and transition countries. The origin, scope and consequences of corruption vary significantly across the different frameworks. The normative conclusions should therefore be adjusted accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ades, Alberto and Di Tella, Rafael (1999) “Rents, Competition, and Corruption.” American Economic Review, 89(4): 982–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, Edward (1975) “Corruption as a Feature of Governmental Organization.” Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3): 587–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Bruce (1998) “Between Markets and Politics: A Social Choice Theoretic Appreciation of the Charitable Sector.” George Mason Law Review, 6: 821–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombatto, Enrico and Macey, Jonathan (1999) “Information and Transaction Costs as the Determinants of Politically Tolerable Growth Levels.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155: 617–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jouvenel, Bertrand (1945) Du Pouvoir: Histoire Naturelle de sa Croissance. Genève: Les Éditions du Cheval Ailé (republished in English in Indianapolis: The Liberty Fund, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Antonella and Vannucci, Alberto (1997) “The 'Perverse Effect' of Political Corruption.” Political Studies. XLV, 3 (Special Issue on Political Corruption Edited by Paul Heywood): 516–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash (1996) The Making of Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, William (2002) “The Cartel of Good Intentions: Markets vs. Bureaucracy in Foreign Aid.” Working Paper, no. 4, March. Washington: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Graham (1989) Lords of Poverty. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Arvind K. (1998) “Corruption: An Introduction.” In: Jain, Arvind K. (Ed.), Economics of Corruption, pp. 1–12. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, Antoni and Kaminski, Bartlomej (2001) “Governance and Corruption in Transition: The Challenge of Subverting Corruption.” Economic Survey of Europe 2001, no. 2, New York and Geneva: United Nations: 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Daniel (1997) “Corruption: The Facts.” Foreign Policy, 107: 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Daniel (1998a) “Research on Corruption: Critical Empirical Issues.” In: Jain, Arvind K. (Ed.) Economics of Corruption, pp. 129–176. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Daniel (1998b) “Corruption in Transition Economies.” In: Newman, Paul (Ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, pp. 522–530. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, Daniel, Loayza, Norman, and Soares, Rodrigo Reis (2001) “Accountability and Corruption. Political Institutions Matter.” Working Paper. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Bertin (Ed.), Mummert, Uwe, Murrell, Peter, and Seabright, Paul (2001) The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, Paolo (1997) “Why Worry about Corruption?” Economic Issues, Vol. 6. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbaku, John (2000) Bureaucratic and Political Corruption in Africa: The Public Choice Perspective. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy,Kevin, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert (1993) “Why is Rent-Seeking so Costly to Growth.” American Economic Review, 83(2): 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco (2001) “Electoral Rules and Corruption.”Working Paper. Stockholm: Institute for International Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raico, Ralph (2004) Classical Liberalism: Historical Essays in Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1998) “Corruption.” In: Newman, Peter (Ed.), The NewPalgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, pp. 517–522. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, Xiaohang (1996) “Commitment with Selfish Regulators.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 29: S265–S269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, Vito and Davoodi, Hamid (1998) “Roads to Nowhere: How Corruption in Public Investment Hurts Growth.” Economic Issues, Vol. 12. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Shan-Jin (2001) “Corruption in Economic Transition and Development: Grease or Sand?” Economic Survey of Europe 2001, No. 2, New York and Geneva: United Nations: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000) Helping Countries Combat Corruption: Progress at the World Bank since 1997. Washington, DC: OCS/PREM, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, Fareed (1997) “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs, Nov./Dec.: 22–43.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colombatto, E. Why is Corruption Tolerated?. The Review of Austrian Economics 16, 363–379 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027349206371

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027349206371

Navigation