Reconciliation with the Utility of Chance by Elaborated Outcomes Destroys the Axiomatic Basis of Expected Utility Theory
 Robin Pope
 … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
Expected utility theory does not directly deal with the utility of chance. It has been suggested in the literature (Samuelson, 1952, Markowitz, 1959) that this can be remedied by an approach which explicitly models the emotional consequences which give rise to the utility of chance. We refer to this as the elaborated outcomes approach. It is argued that the elaborated outcomes approach destroys the possibility of deriving a representation theorem based on the usual axioms of expected utility theory. This is shown with the help of an example due to Markowitz. It turns out that the space of conceivable lotteries over elaborated outcomes is too narrow to permit the application of the axioms. Moreover it is shown that a representation theorem does not hold for the example.
 Aumann, R.J. Letter from Robert Aumann to Leonard Savage, 8 January 1971. In: Aumann, R.J. eds. (1997) Collected Papers. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 305306
 Broome, J. (1984) Rationality and the surething principle. University of Bristol, Bristol
 Broome, J. (1986) Rationality and the surething principle. Research School of Social Science, Australian National University, Canberra
 Broome, J. (1991a), Rationality and the surething principle, in J. Gay Tulip Meeks (ed.), Thoughtful Economic Man, Cambridge University Press, 74–102
 Broome, J. Expected Utility and Rationality. In: Broome, J. eds. (1991) Weighing Goods. Blackwell, UK, pp. 90120
 Canaan, E. Profit. In: Higgs, H. eds. (1963) Palgrave's Dictionary of Political Economy. Kelley, New York
 Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and Decisions. Wiley, New York
 Machina, M. (1989) Dynamic Consistency and NonExpected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Literature 27: pp. 162268
 Markowitz, H.M. (1959) Portfolio Selection. Wiley, New York
 Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London
 Pope, R.E. The PreOutcome Period and the Utility of Gambling. In: Stigum, B.P., Wenstøp, F. eds. (1983) Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 137177
 Pope, R.E. (1985) Timing Contradictions in von Neumann and Morgenstern's Axioms and in Savage's SureThing Proof. Theory and Decision 18: pp. 229261
 Pope, R.E. The Bayesian Approach: Irreconcilable with Expected Utility Theory?. In: Munier, B. eds. (1988) Risk, Decision and Rationality. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221230
 Pope, R.E. (1988b), Reality versus Intention in the Expected Utility Procedure, Fourth International Conference on the Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory, Budapest.
 Pope, R.E. (1991) The Delusion of Certainty in Savage's SureThing Principle. Journal of Economic Psychology 12: pp. 209241
 Pope, R.E. Lowered Welfare under the Expected Utility Procedure. In: Chikán, A. eds. (1991) Progress in Decision, Utility and Risk. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 125133
 Pope, R.E. (1996) Debates on the Utility of Chance: A Look Back to Move Forward. Journal for Science of Research 11: pp. 4392
 Pope, R.E. Attractions to and Repulsions from Chance. In: Leinfellner, W., Köhler, E. eds. (1998) Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 95107
 Pope, R.E., forthcoming, Evidence of Deliberate Violations of Dominance due to Secondary Satisfactions – Attractions to Chance, Homo Economicus, 33pp.
 Savage, L.J. (1972) Foundations of Statistics. Dover, NewYork
 Savage, L.J. Letter from Leonard Savage to Robert Aumann. In: Aumann, R.J. eds. (1997) Collected Papers. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 307310
 Samuelson, P. (1952) Probability, Utility and the Independence Axiom. Econometrica 20: pp. 670678
 Smith, A. (1982) The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries: Illustrated by the History of Astronomy. Liberty Press, Indianapolis
 Title
 Reconciliation with the Utility of Chance by Elaborated Outcomes Destroys the Axiomatic Basis of Expected Utility Theory
 Journal

Theory and Decision
Volume 49, Issue 3 , pp 223234
 Cover Date
 20001101
 DOI
 10.1023/A:1026520128623
 Print ISSN
 00405833
 Online ISSN
 15737187
 Publisher
 Kluwer Academic Publishers
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Keywords

 Utility of chance
 Elaborated outcomes
 Axiomatised expected utility theory
 Representation theorem
 Industry Sectors
 Authors

 Robin Pope ^{(1)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Department of Economics, University of Tennessee, 508 Stokely Management Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, 379960550, USA