Skip to main content
Log in

A validation of the concept of current perceived health and the Current Perceived Health-42 (CPH-42) questionnaire

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perceived or self-rated general health in its trait form reliably predicts subsequent mortality among certain sections of the community. In an investigation of the predictive value of health status at the time of assessment, 574 cases drawn from five groups (police trainees, firemen, students, out-patients and in-patients) were used to validate what we have called current perceived health (CPH) and the CPH-42, a measure of CPH is described. Results indicate those rating their CPH as poorer were more likely to consult a doctor (chi-squared=45.9, df=1, p < 0.0000) and use medication (chi-squared=61.0, df=1, p < 0.0000). In comparison, general perceived health ratings did not predict either consultation or medication use. The instrument has good psychometric properties, with high divergent validity from general mental health and general health, with a Guttman split-half reliability > 0.79. Discriminant analysis using the CPH-42 achieved high correct classification rates (up to 100%). Comparison of a scoring method based on canonical coefficients (83% correct classification) with that based on summative scores (74% correct classification) indicate the former method to be more accurate. Age, and among people 40 years or older, gender were significant independent predictors of current perceived health status, with older people rating their current health less positively than younger, and females over 40 years rating their current health less positively than their male counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spilker B. Introduction. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials.New York: Raven Press, 1990: 3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hyland ME. A reformulation of quality of life for medical science. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 267-272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Idler EL, Kasl SV, Lemke JH. Self-evaluated health and mortality among the elderly in New Haven, Connecticut, Iowa and Washington. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 91-103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Idler EL, Angel RJ. Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES-1 epidemiologic follow-up study. Am J Pub Health 1990; 80: 446-452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright SJ. Health status assessment. In: Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Weinman J, West R, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wright S. Self-ratings of health: the influence of age and smoking status and the role of different explanatory models. Psychol and Health 1987; 1: 379-397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Butler L, Cheang J, Fielding R, Wong CM, Hedley AJ. Assessing patient satisfaction with specialist out-patient services in Hong Kong. (under review) Qual Health Care.

  8. Herzlich C. Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis.Graham D, Trans. London: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blaxter M. Health and Lifestyles.London: Tavistock/Routledge, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams R. A Protestant Legacy: Attitudes to Death and Illness Among Older Aberdonians.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Fielding R. The measurement of current perceived health among Chinese people in Guangzhou and Hong Kong, southern China. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 271-278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fielding R, Li J, Tang YE. Health care utilization as a function of subjective health status, job satisfaction and gender among health care workers in Guangzhou, Southern China. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1103-1110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J. The development of an instrument for measuring perceived current health status of people in the communities of southern China and Hong Kong.Unpublished Master's Dissertation. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Royal Coll Gen Pract 1985; 35: 185-189.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chong MY, Wilkinson G. Validation of 30-and 12-item versions of the Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in patients admitted for general health screening. Psychological Med 1989; 19: 495-505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Med 1979; 9: 139-145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fielding R. Depression and myocardial infarction: A review and reinterpretation. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 1017-1027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fielding, R., Li, J. A validation of the concept of current perceived health and the Current Perceived Health-42 (CPH-42) questionnaire. Qual Life Res 6, 35–42 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026413427599

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026413427599

Navigation