Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 213–228

Foucault, Feminism, and Informed Choice

Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1026006403305

Cite this article as:
Ells, C. Journal of Medical Humanities (2003) 24: 213. doi:10.1023/A:1026006403305

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show that the standard notion of informed choice is unacceptable and must be replaced. To do so, I examine Foucault's analysis of people in contemporary society, drawing attention to the ways power relations act upon us, and to the possibility of resistance. I show how feminist moral theory can be enriched by Foucault's analysis. Applying this new understanding of people and moral theory to an analysis of informed choice, I claim that the standard notion of informed choice is unacceptable, in part because it relies on a false conception of people. Its “necessary” features—intention, understanding, and absence of controlling influences—are much more difficult, if not impossible, to obtain than proponents of the standard notion believe. I end by offering direction for creating a new, Foucault-inspired, feminist theory of informed choice.

Foucaultfeminisminformed choiceinformed consentpowerresistance

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Ethics UnitMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada