Students' Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this study we investigated the relationship between college students' perceptions of professors' expressiveness and implicit age and gender stereotypes. Three hundred and fifty-two male and female students watched slides of an age- and gender-neutral stick figure and listened to a neutral voice presenting a lecture, and then evaluated it on teacher evaluation forms that indicated 1 of 4 different age and gender conditions (male, female, “old,” and “young”). Main and interaction effects indicated that students rated the “young” male professor higher than they did the “young” female, “old” male, and “old” female professors on speaking enthusiastically and using a meaningful voice tone during the class lecture regardless of the identical manner in which the material was presented. Implications of biased teacher-expressiveness items on student evaluations are discussed.
Abrami, P. C., & d'Appollonia, S. (1999). Current concerns are past concerns. American Psychologist, 54, 519–520.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved October 4, 2002, from http://WWW.apa.org/ethics
Amin, M. E. (1994). Gender as a discriminating factor in the evaluation of teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19, 135–143.
Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., & Monteith, M. J. (2001). Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 789–799.
Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 272–281.
Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York: Guilford.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925–945.
Barnes, L. L., & Barnes, M. W. (1993). Academic discipline and generalizability of student evaluations of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 23, 135–149.
Basow, S. A. (1990). Effects of teacher expressiveness: Mediated by teacher sex-typing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 599–602.
Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 656–665.
Basow, S. A. (1998). Student evaluations: The role of gender bias and teaching styles. In L. H. Collins, J. C. Chrisler, & K. Quina (Eds.), Arming Athena: Career strategies for women in academe (pp. 135–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students' choices. Sex Roles, 34, 407–417.
Basow, S., & Distenfeld, M. S. (1985). Teacher expressiveness: More important for male teachers than female teachers? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 45–52.
Basow, S. A., & Howe, K. G. (1987). Evaluations of college professors' sex-type, and sex, and students' sex. Psychological Reports, 60, 671–678.
Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 308–314.
Bendya, M. E., Finucane, T., Kirby, L., & O'Donnell, J. P. (1996). Gender differences in public attitudes toward the Gulf War: A test of competing hypotheses. Social Science Journal, 33, 1–22.
Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 170–179.
Best, J. B., & Addison, W. E. (2000). A preliminary study of perceived warmth of professor and student evaluations. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 60–62.
Bousfield, W. A. (1940). Students' ratings of qualities considered desirable in college professors. School and Society, 51, 253–256.
Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71, 17–33.
Chabot, H. F. (2000). Predicting ageist and sexist attitudes and the conditions for their existence (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 12-B. (UMI No. 9953418)
Costa, P., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Cognition, 81, 322–331.
Cravens, T. F. (1996, March). Students' perceptions of the characteristics of teaching excellence. Paper presented at the National Social Science Conference, Reno, NV.
Danziger, P. R., & Welfel, E. R. (2000). Age, gender, and health bias in counselors: An empirical analysis. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 135–149.
d'Appolonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1198–1208.
Das, M., & Das, H. (2001). Business students' perceptions of best university professors: Does gender role matter? Sex Roles, 45, 665–676.
Deal, L.V., & Oyer, H. J. (1991). Ratings of vocal pleasantness and the aging process. Folia Phoniatrica, 43(1), 44–48.
Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford.
Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1996). The knife that cuts both ways: Facilitated and inhibited access to traits as a result of stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 271–288.
Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459–471.
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287.
England, E. M., & Manko, W. (1991, April). College student evaluations of stereotypic female subcategory members. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, NY.
Fazio, R. H., Roskos-Ewaldsen, D. R., & Powell, M. C. (1994). Attitudes, perception, and attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 197–216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education, 24, 139–213.
Freeman, H. (1994). Student evaluations of college instructors: Effects of type of course taught, instructor gender and gender role, and student gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 627–630.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Gender, power dynamics, and social interaction. In M. M. Ferree & J. Lorder (Eds.), Revisioning gender: The gender lens (pp. 365–398). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Greenwald, A. G. (1997). Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1182–1186.
Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209–1217.
Guerrero, L. K., & Miller, T. (1998). Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses. Communication Education, 47(1), 30–42.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 653–682.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.
Hopkins, N., & Moore, C. (2001). Categorizing the neighbors: Identity, distance, and stereotyping. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 239–252.
Kalavar, J. M. (2001). Examining agesim: Do male and female college students differ? Educational Gerontology, 27,507–513.
Kawakami, K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2001). The reliability of implicit stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 212–225.
Kawakami, K., Young, H., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Automatic stereotyping: Category, trait, and behavioral activations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 3–15.
Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P., & Dill, P. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: Bias in students' ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 342–344.
Kite, M. E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want women and men to be? In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 215–227). New York: Wiley.
Lachman, S. J. (1996). Processes in perception: Psychological transformations of highly structured stimulus material. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 411–418.
LeBlanc, R. (1998, June/July). Good teaching: The top 10 requirements. The Teaching Professor, p. 1.
Levin, W. C. (1988). Age stereotyping: College student evaluations. Research on Aging, 10(1), 134–148.
Levy, B. R. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092–1107.
Levy, B. R. (2001). Eradication of ageism requires addressing the enemy within. Gerontologist, 41, 578–579.
Levy, B. R., & Banaji, M. R. (2002). Implicit ageism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 49–75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., Thorn, T. M. J., & Castelli, L. (1997). On the activation of social stereotypes: The moderating role of processing objectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 471–489.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187–1197.
Martin, E. (1984). Power and authority in the classroom: Sexist stereotypes in teaching evaluations. Signs, 9, 482–492.
McKeachie, W. J. (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist, 52, 1218–1225.
Messner, M. A. (2000). White guy habitus in the classroom: Challenging the reproduction of privilege. Men and Masculinities, 2, 457–469.
Mulac, A., & Lundell, T. L. (1982). An empirical test of the gender-linked language effect in a public speaking setting. Language and Speech, 25, 243–256.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 101–115.
Ogden, D., Chapman, A. D., & Doak, L. (1994, November). Characteristics of good/effective teachers: Gender differences in student descriptors. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN.
Perdue, C. W., & Gurtman, M. B. (1990). Evidence for the automaticity of ageism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 199–216.
Peterson, C. C. (1980). Are young people biased against older teachers? Journal of Genetic Psychology, 136, 309–310.
Pittinsky, T. L., Shih, M., & Ambady, N. (2000). Will a category cue you? Category cues, positive stereotypes, and reviewer recall for applicants. Social Psychology of Education, 4(1), 53–65.
Radmacher, S. A., & Martin, D. J. (2001). Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through hierarchical regression analysis. Journal of Psychology, 135, 259–268.
Scherer, K. R. (1992). On social representations of emotional experience: Stereotypes, prototypes, or archetypes? In M. von Cranach, W. Doise, & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social representations and the social bases of knowledge [Swiss Monographs in Psychology] (Vol. 1, pp. 30–36). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.
Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118.
Tatro, C. N. (1995). Gender effects on student ratings of faculty. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, 169–173.
Unger, R. K. (1979). Sexism in teacher evaluation: The comparability of real life to laboratory analogs. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 1(2), 163–170.
Unger, R. K., & Saundra. (1993). Sexism: An integrated perspective. In F. L. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 141–188). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Upham, D. (2001, November). Celebrating teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of Kappa Delta Pi, Orlando, FL.
Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). "How'm I doing?" Problems with student rating of instructors and courses. Change, 29(5), 12–23.
Wilson, R. (1998, January 16). New research casts doubt on value of student evaluations of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, 12–14.
- Students' Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations
Volume 49, Issue 9-10 , pp 507-516
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- student evaluations
- teacher expressiveness
- students' stereotypes
- Industry Sectors