GEQUAMO—A Generic, Multilayered, Customisable, Software Quality Model
- Elli Georgiadou
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Software quality models have primarily been based on top down process improvement approaches. Such models are based on the fundamental principle of empowerment of all involved and foster a questioning attitude through the active exchange of ideas and criticism ensuring that the most appropriate approach for quality improvements is adopted. The holistic view of systems enables the incorporation of many viewpoints held by different parties within the same organisation and by the same party at different stages of development. In this paper the GEQUAMO (GEneric, multilayered and customisable) QUAlity MOdel is proposed. GEQUAMO encapsulates the requirements of different stakeholders in a dynamic and flexible manner so as to enable each stakeholder (developer, user or sponsor) to construct their own model reflecting the emphasis/weighting for each attribute/requirement. Using a combination of the CFD (Composite Features Diagramming Technique) developed by the author, and Kiviat diagrams a multilayered and dynamic model is constructed. Instances of models are presented together with the algorithm for the computation of the profiles. Indications of future work conclude the paper.
- Barbor, N. and Georgiadou, E. 2002. Investigating the applicability of the Taguchi method to software development, Proceedings of Quality Week, San Francisco, USA, July.
- Boehm, B. (1989) Software Risk Management. IEEE Computer Society Press, CA
- Burr, A. and Georgiadou, E. 1995. Software development maturity-a comparison with other industries, 5th World Congress on Total Quality, India, New Delhi, February.
- Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. 1990. Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley.
- Dromey, R.G. (1995) A model for software product quality. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 21: pp. 146-162
- Fenton, N. (1991) Software Metrics-A Rigorous Approach. Chapman & Hall, London
- Georgiadou, E., Hy, T. and Berki, E. 1998. Automated qualitative and quantitative evaluation of software methods and tools, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Israel Society for Quality, Jerusalem, Israel, December.
- Hyatt, I. and |Rosenberg, L. 1996. A software quality model and metrics for identifying project risks and assessing software quality, http://www.di.ufpe.br/~inspector/relacionados/stc
- Ince, D. (1995) Software Quality Assurance. McGraw-Hill, New York
- ISO-12207. 1998. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/activities/cmm/docs/standards-map.pdf
- ISO-9126. 2001. http://www.issco.unige.ch/projects/ewg96/node13.html
- Logothetis, N., Wynn, H.P. (1989) Quality through Design: Experimental Design, 'Off-line Quality Control and Taguchi's Contributions'. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford
- McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K. and Walters, G.F. 1977. Factors in software quality, RADC TR-77-369, Us Rome Air Development Center Reports.
- Siakas, K. 2002. SQM-CODES; Software quality management-cultural and organisational diversity evaluation, Ph.D. thesis submitted November 2002 for the degree of Ph.D. at London Metropolitan University.
- Siakas, K., Berki, E., Georgiadou, E. and Sadler, C. 1997. The complete alphabet of quality software systems, 7th World Congress for Total Quality Management, New Delhi, India, February.
- Version 1.00
- GEQUAMO—A Generic, Multilayered, Customisable, Software Quality Model
Software Quality Journal
Volume 11, Issue 4 , pp 313-323
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Software Quality model
- multilayer model
- customisable model
- stakeholders' worldview
- Industry Sectors
- Elli Georgiadou (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Computing Science, Middlesex University, Trent Park Campus, Bramley Road, London, N14 4YZ, UK