Banker, R.D., Chang, H.-H., and Majumdar, S.K., “Economies of scope in the U.S. telecommunications industry,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 10, pp. 253–272, 1998.Google Scholar
Berg, S.V. and Tschirhart, J., “A market test for natural monopoly in local exchange,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 8, pp. 103–124, 1995.Google Scholar
Bitzan, J., “Railroad cost conditions—implications for policy.” Prepared for the Federal Railroad Administration, US Department of Transportation, 10 May 2000.
Bloch, H., Madden, G., and Savage, S.J., “Economies of scale and scope in Australian telecommunications,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 18, pp. 219–227, 2001.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, W.P., “Competition in the rail industry,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 13, pp. 93–103, 1997.Google Scholar
Brennan, T.J., “Why regulated firms should be kept out of unregulated markets: Understanding the divestiture in United States
,” Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 32, pp. 741–793, 1987.Google Scholar
Brennan, T.J., “Is the theory behind U.S.
applicable today?” Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 40, pp. 455–482, 1995.Google Scholar
Briceño, C.M., Efficiency Measurement for Regulatory Market-Structure Regimes of the Electric Power Industry. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, April 2002.
Buchler, S., “How to regulate vertical market structure in network industries.” Unpublished paper, Socioeconomic Institute at the University of Zurich, June 18, 2001.
Bush, J. and Spiro, N., “New rules: A survey of telecoms,” Business Central Europe, vol. 7no. 75, pp. 51–60, 2000.Google Scholar
Business Central Europe, “The annual 2001”.
Carter, M. and Wright, J., “Interconnection in network industries,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 14, pp. 1–25, 1999.Google Scholar
Day, C.J. and Bunn, D.W., “Divestiture of generation assets in the electricity pool of England and Wales: a computational approach to analyzing market power,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 19, pp. 123–141, 2001.Google Scholar
European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT), Rail Restructuring in Europe, Paris: ECMT, 1998.Google Scholar
Ennis, S., “Competition and price dispersion in international long distance calling,” US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper 01–3, April 23, 2001.
Estache, A., Goldstein, A., and Pittman, R., “Privatization and regulatory reform in Brazil: the case of freight railways,” Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade, vol. 1, pp. 203–235, 2001.Google Scholar
US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Regional Transmission Organizations, Docket No. RM99-2-000, Washington: May 13, 1999.
Freebairn, J., “Access prices for rail infrastructure,” Economic Record, vol. 74, pp. 286–296, 1998.Google Scholar
Gabel, D., “Private Telecommunications Networks: An Historical Perspective.” In E. Noam and A. Níshúilleabháin, (eds), Public Networks, Public Objectives, Elsevier, 1996.
Gabel, D. and Kennet, D.M., “Economies of scope in the local telephone exchange market,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 6, pp. 381–398, 1994.Google Scholar
García de Alba, P., “Competition issues in the privatization of the Mexican railroads.” Remarks prepared for the Seminar on Railway Reform, Restructuring and Competition, Moscow, 4–5 December 2000.
Hansson, L. and Nilsson, J.-E., “A new Swedish railroad policy: Separation of infrastructure and traffic production,” Transportation Research-A, vol. 25A, pp. 153–159, 1991.Google Scholar
Harris, R.G. and Kraft, C.J., “Meddling through: regulating local telephone competition in the United States,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 93–112, 1997.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.A., “Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications,” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, pp. 1–38, 1997.
Hayashi, P.M., Goo, J.Y.-J., and Chamberlain, W.C., “Vertical economies: the case of U.S. electric utility industry, 1983–87,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 63, pp. 710–725, 1997.Google Scholar
Heller, W.B. and McCubbins, M.D., “Politics, institutions, and outcomes: electricity regulation in Argentina and Chile,” Journal of Policy Reform, vol. 1, pp. 357–387, 1996.Google Scholar
Hsing, Y. and Mixon, F.G., Jr., “Price convergence in contestable market structures: The impact of time and price-caps on intercity telecommunications rates,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 9, pp. 813–822, 1994.Google Scholar
Humphreys, E. and Birch, I., “Extending TERFFs to Central and Eastern Europe,” Arup Journal, pp. 16–17, 2000.
Ivaldi, M. and McCullough, G.J., “Density and integration effects on class I U.S. freight railroads,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 19, pp. 161–182, 2001.Google Scholar
Joskow, P.L., “Restructuring, competition and regulatory reform in the U.S. electricity sector,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 119–138, 1997.Google Scholar
Joskow, P.L., “California's electricity crisis,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 17, pp. 265–388, 2002.Google Scholar
Kahn, A.E., The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, Wiley: New York, 1971 (repr. 1988).Google Scholar
Kaserman, D.L. and Mayo, J.W., “The measurement of vertical economies and the efficient structure of the electric utility industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 39, pp. 483–502, 1991.Google Scholar
Kerf, M. and Geradin, D., “Post-liberalization challenges in telecommunications: balancing antitrust and sector-specific regulation,” World Competition, vol. 23, pp. 27–77, 2000.Google Scholar
Kirby, M.W., The Origins of Railway Enterprise: The Stockton and Darlington Railway, 1821–1863, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Knittel, C.R., “Interstate long distance rates: search costs, switching costs, and market power,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 12, pp. 519–536, 1997.Google Scholar
Kopicki, R. and Thompson, L.S., Best Methods of Railway Restructuring and Privatization, World Bank: Washington, CFS Discussion Paper Series 111, August 1995.Google Scholar
Kwoka, J.E., “Vertical economies in electric power: evidence on integration and its alternatives,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 20, pp. 653–671, 2002.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J., Competition in Telecommunications, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2000.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J., “Network competition: I. Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 29, pp. 1–37, 1998.Google Scholar
Lardner, D., Railway Economy: A Treatise on the New Art of Transport, Taylor, Walton & Maberly: London, 1850 (repr. Augustus M. Kelley: New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Lee, B.-J., “Separability test for the electricity supply industry,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 10, pp. 49–60, 1995.Google Scholar
MacAvoy, P.W., “Testing for competitiveness of markets for long distance telephone services: Competition finally?” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 13, pp. 295–319, 1998.Google Scholar
Mercer Management Consulting, Restructuring the Polish State Railways (PKP), Lexington, MA, January 1992.
Newbery, D.M., “Competition and regulation in the electricity industry.” Paper prepared for the OECD/World Bank Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest, June 1994a.
Newbery, D.M., “Restructuring and privatizing electric utilities in Eastern Europe,” Economics of Transition, vol. 2, pp. 291–316, 1994b.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M., Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Utilities, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Regulatory Reform in Electricity, Road and Rail Freight in the Czech Republic, Committee on Competition Law and Policy, Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation, January 25, 2001a.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Regulatory Reform: The Poland Country Review, Committee on Competition Law and Policy, May 15, 2001b.
Ordover, J.A. and Pittman, R.W., “Restructuring the railway for competition.” Paper prepared for the OECD/World Bank Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest, June 1994. Earlier version published in Polish as “Restrukturyzacja Polskich Kolei Państwowych,” Przeglad Organizacji, vol. 1, pp. 23–25, 1994.Google Scholar
Parry, R.H.N., “Vertical integration, competition and efficiency: The case of the rail industry,” Kobe University Economic Review, vol. 43, pp. 73–92, 1997.Google Scholar
Pinkepank, J.A., “When (and where and why) railroads share track,” Trains, pp. 20–29, January 1979.
Pittman, R.W., “Railroads and competition: The Santa Fe/Southern Pacific merger proposal,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 39, pp. 25–46, 1990.Google Scholar
Pittman, R.W., “Railway competition: options for the Russian federation.” Paper presented at Seminar on Railway Reform, Restructuring and Competition, Moscow, 4–5 December 2000. Published in Russian in ECO, vol. 8, pp. 13–29, 2001.
Pittman, R.W., “Restructurarea căilor ferate române—pe orizontală, nu pe verticală,” Oeconomica, pp. 289–297, 2002.
Pittman, R.W., “Reforma Regiilor Autonome: Trebuie România să adopte noua ortodoxie a separărilor pe verticală?” Oeconomica, 2003a.
Pittman, R.W., “A Note on Non-Discriminatory Access to Railroad Infrastructure.” U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper 03–5, April 2003b
Pupillo, L. and Conte, A., “The economics of local loop architecture for multimedia services,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 10, pp. 107–126, 1998.Google Scholar
Ringskog, K., “Discussion.” In OECD/World Bank Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest, June 1994.
Savignat, M.G. and Nash, C., “The case for rail reform in Europe: evidence from studies of production characteristics of the rail industry,” International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 26, pp. 201–217, 1999.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., “Telecommunications Reform in the United States: Promises and Pitfalls.” In P. Welfens and G. Yarrow (eds), Telecommunications and Energy in Systemic Transformation, Springer Verlag: Heidelberg, 1996.Google Scholar
Shin, R.T. and Ying, J.S., “Unnatural monopolies in local telephone,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 23, pp. 171–183, 1992.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. and Biddle, G. (eds), The Oxford Companion to British Railway History, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
Spiller, P. and Cardilli, C., “The frontier of telecommunications deregulation: small countries leading the pack,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, pp. 127–138, 1997.Google Scholar
Sung, N. and Gort, M., “Economies of scale and natural monopoly in the U.S. local telephone industry,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 82, pp. 694–697, 2000.Google Scholar
Sung, N. and Lee, Y.-H., “Substitution between mobile and fixed telephones in Korea,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 20, pp. 367–374, 2002.Google Scholar
Trebing, H.M., “Electricity: changes and issues,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 17, pp. 61–74, 2000.Google Scholar
Tysklind, A., “The Swedish rail reforms and developments in the EU.” Remarks prepared for the OECD Seminar on Railway Reform, Restructuring and Competition, Moscow, December 2000.
von Hirschhausen, C., Modernizing Infrastructure in Transformation Economies: Paving the Way to European Enlargement, Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA, 2002.Google Scholar
von Hirschhausen, C. and Meinhart, B., “Infrastructure policies and liberalization in the East European transition countries—would less have been more?” Unpublished paper, DIW-Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), 2001.
von Hirschhausen, C. and Opitz, P., “Power utility re-regulation in East European and CIS transformation countries (1990–1999): An institutional interpretation,” Berlin, DIW (German Institute for Economic Research), Discussion Paper 2001.Google Scholar
Wallsten, S., “Ringing in the 20th century: the effects of state monopolies, private ownership, and operating licenses on telecommunications in Europe, 1982–1914,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 00-37, June 2001.
Waters, W.G., II, “Rail Cost Analysis.” In K.J. Button, and D.E. Pitfield (eds), International Railway Economics, Gower: Aldershot, 1985.Google Scholar
Welsby, J. and Nichols, A., “The privatization of Britain's railways: An inside view,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol. 33, pp. 55–76, 1999.Google Scholar
White, L.J., “The deregulation of the telephone industry: The lessons from the U.S. railroad deregulation experience.” In R. Sato, R.V. Ramachandran, and K. Mino (eds), Global Competition and Integration, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.Google Scholar
Wilner, F.N., “Competitive access: lessons from Great Britain,” Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics and Policy, vol. 65, pp. 182–191, 1998.Google Scholar
Wolak, F.A., “Report on Electricity Industry Restructuring in Romania.” In I. Kessides (ed.), Romania: Regulatory and Structural Assessment in the Network Utilities, World Bank: Washington, June 15, 2000.Google Scholar
World Bank, World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets, World Bank: Washington, DC, 2001.Google Scholar