What’s so Transparent about Transparency?
- Amy KindAffiliated withDepartment of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna College
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Representationalists often use intuitions about the transparency ofexperience to defend their view that qualitative content isrepresentational content. According to these intuitions, wecannot attend to our experience except by attending to theobject of that experience. Although the transparency intuitionappears to be widely shared, even among non-representationalists,in this paper I suggest that there are two ambiguities inherent indiscussions of transparency. One concerns the strength of thetransparency intuition, while the other concerns its scope. Oncewe bring these two ambiguities to the surface, we can see that therepresentationalists’ claim that experience is transparent turnsout to be considerably more controversial than ordinarily supposed.While the phenomenological data may support some kind of experientialtransparency, I argue that it does not support the kind of transparencyneeded for representationalism.
- What’s so Transparent about Transparency?
Volume 115, Issue 3 , pp 225-244
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Amy Kind (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna College, 850 Columbia Avenue, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA, E-mail