Abstract
Advertisers often use computers to create fantastic images. Generally, these are perfectly harmless images that are used for comic or dramatic effect. Sometimes, however, they are problematic human images that I call computer-generated images of perfection. Advertisers create these images by using computer technology to remove unwanted traits from models or to generate entire human bodies. They are images that portray ideal human beauty, bodies, or looks. In this paper, I argue that the use of such images is unethical. I begin by explaining the common objections against advertising and by demonstrating how critics might argue that those objections apply to computer-generated images of perfection. Along the way, I demonstrate an ethically significant difference between computer-generated images of perfection and the images in ordinary ads. I argue that although critics might use this fact to apply the common objections to the use of computer-generated images of perfection, the objections fail. Finally, I argue that despite surviving the common objections, the use of computer-generated images of perfection is subject to an ethical objection that is based on aesthetic considerations. Advertisers are ethically obligated to avoid certain aesthetic results that are produced by computer-generated images of perfection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrington, R.: 1982, 'Advertising and Behavior Control', Journal of Business Ethics 1, 3–12.
Attas, D.: 1999, 'What's Wrong with “Deceptive” Advertising?', Journal of Business Ethics 21, 49–59.
Beauchamp, T.: 1984, 'Manipulative Advertising', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3, 1–22.
Bishop, J.: 2000, 'Is Self-Identity Image Advertising Ethical?', Business Ethics Quarterly 10, 371–398.
Camenisch, P.: 1991, 'Marketing Ethics: Some Dimensions of the Challenge', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 245–248.
Carroll, N.: 2000, 'Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research', Ethics 110, 350–387.
Carson, T., R. Wokutch and J. Cox.: 1985, 'An Ethical Analysis of Deception in Advertising', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 93–104.
Conroy, E.: 1995, 'A Critique of Social Contracts for Business', Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 187–212.
Crisp, R.: 1987, 'Persuasive Advertising, Autonomy, and the Creation of Desire', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 413–418.
DeGeorge, R.: 2000, 'Business Ethics and the Challenge of the Information Age', Business Ethics Quarterly 10, 63–72.
Descartes, R.: 1977, 'Meditations on First Philosophy', in S. Cahn (ed.), Classics of Western Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis), pp. 301–341.
Donaldson, T.: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee.: 1994, 'Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory', Academy of Management Review 19, 252–284.
Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee.: 1999, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
Douglas, M.: 2000, 'Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Hype over Hypernorms', Journal of Business Ethics 26, 101–110.
Hare, R. M.: 1984, 'Commentary on Beauchamp's “Manipulative Advertising”', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3, 23–28.
Hodapp, P.: 1990, 'Can There Be a Social Contract with Business?', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 127–131.
Husted, B.: 1999, 'A Critique of the Empirical Methods of Integrative Social Contracts Theory', Journal of Business Ethics 20, 227–235.
Hyman, M. and R. Tansey.: 1990, 'The Ethics of Psychoactive Ads', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 105–114.
Jackson, J.: 1990, 'Honesty in Marketing', Journal of Applied Philosophy 7, 51–60.
Keeley, M.: 1995, 'Continuing the Social Contract Tradition', Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 241–255.
Lippke, R.: 1989, 'Advertising and the Social Conditions of Autonomy', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 8, 35–58.
Lippke, R.: 1999, 'The “Necessary Evil” Defense of Manipulative Advertising', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 18, 3–20.
Machan, T.: 1987, 'Advertising: The Whole or Only Some of the Truth?', Public Affairs Quarterly 1, 59–71.
Paine, L.: 1984, 'Children as Consumers: An Ethical Evaluation of Children's Television Advertising', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3, 119–146.
Peterson, R.: 1987, 'Bulemia and Anorexia in an Advertising Context', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 495–504.
Phillips, B.: 1997, 'In Defense of Advertising: A Social Perspective', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 109–118.
Phillips, M.: 1994, 'The Inconclusive Case Against Manipulative Advertising', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 13, 31–64.
Putnam, H.: 1975, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Rowan, J.: 1997, 'Grounding Hypernorms: Towards a Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics', Economics and Philosophy 13, 107–112.
Santilli, P.: 1983, 'The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Moral Appraisal', Journal of Business Ethics 2, 27–34.
Sneddon, A.: 2001, 'Advertising and Deep Autonomy', Journal of Business Ethics 33, 15–28.
Waide, J.: 1987, 'The Making of Self and World in Advertising', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 73–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spurgin, E.W. What's Wrong with Computer-Generated Images of Perfection in Advertising?. Journal of Business Ethics 45, 257–268 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024155629554
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024155629554