Skip to main content
Log in

Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the contemporary debate on the concepts and definitions of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Sustainability (CS). The conclusions, based on historical perspectives, philosophical analyses, impact of changing contexts and situations and practical considerations, show that "one solution fits all"-definition for CS(R) should be abandoned, accepting various and more specific definitions matching the development, awareness and ambition levels of organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, D. and C. Cowan: 1996, Spiral Dynamics.

  • Collins, J. C. and J. I. Porras: 1997, Built to Last. Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (HarperCollins Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 1997, Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2001, Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2002, Communication: Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1970, The Order of Things (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing Inc., Marshfield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L.: 2000, The Lexus and the Olive Tree. Understanding Globalization (Anchor Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Göbbels, M.: 2001, The Contemporary Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility: Untangling an Emerging Notion.

  • Göbbels, M.: 2002, Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility: The Contemporary Conception of a Fuzzy Notion.

  • Hawken, P.: 1993, The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability (Harper Business, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.: 2001, Misguided Virtue. False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility (New Zealand Business RoundTable, Wellington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilcullen, M. and J. Ohles Kooistra: 1999, 'At Least Do No Harm: Sources on the Changing Role of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility', Reference Services Review 27(2), 158-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koesler, A.: 1976, The Gost in the Machine (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D.: 2001, When Corporations Rule the World, second edition (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Fransisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnanen, L. and V. Panapanaan: 2002, Roadmapping CSR in Finnish Companies (Helsinki University of Technology).

  • Marrewijk, M. and M. Werre: 2003, 'Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability', Journal of Business Ethics (2003).

  • Marrewijk, M. van: 2002, 'European Corporate Sustainability Framework', International Journal of Business Performance Measurement (2002).

  • Marrewijk, M. van and T. W. Hardjono: 2003, 'European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Change', Journal of Business Ethics (2003).

  • Marsden, C. and J. Androf: 1998, 'Towards an Understanding of Corporate Citizenship and How to Influence It', Citizenship Studies 2(2), 329-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A.: 1982, Toward a Psychology of Being (Van Nostrand Reinhold).

  • Pirsig, R.: 1991, Lila, an Inquiry into Morals.

  • Steiner, G. A. and F. S. Steiner: 2000, Business, Government and Society. A Managerial Perspective (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Votaw, D. and S. P. Sethi: 1973, The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values versus Contemporary Problems (Prentice Hall, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L. and P. L. Cochran: 1985, 'The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model', Academy of Management Review 10(4), 758-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, J. and M. Kaptein: 2002, The Balanced Company. A Theory of Corporate Integrity (Oxford University Press).

  • Wilber, K.: 2000, A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Sprirituality (Shambhala).

  • Wilber, K.: 1995, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution (Shambhala).

  • Winter, M. and U. Steger: 1998, Managing Outside Pressure. Strategies for Preventing Corporate Disasters (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, 'Corporate Social Performance Revisited', Academy of Management Journal 16, 691-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development WBCSD: 1999, Meeting Changing Expectations. Corporate Social Responsibility (WBCSD, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development WBCSD: 2000, Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense (WBCSD, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S.: 2001, The Civil Corporation (Earthscan Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, A. van der: 2002, Reputatiemechanisme in beweging: doelstreffend bij issues aan MVO? Master thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Marrewijk, M. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics 44, 95–105 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247

Navigation