Peer Support: Relations between the context, process and outcomes for the students who are supported
- Paul Ashwin
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In this paper an investigation of the outcomesof a Peer Support scheme for the students whoare supported is reported. It was found thatattendance at Peer Support sessions waspositively and significantly correlated toacademic performance. This relationship wasfound even when prior levels of academicperformance were controlled for. However, itwas also found that students who attended PeerSupport sessions adopted less meaningorientated approaches to studying over thecourse of the academic year. It is argued thatthis is an indication that the quality of thelearning of these students fell. Qualitativeevidence suggests that this change in approachwas in response to an increased awareness ofthe assessment demands of the course and thatthese students had become more strategicallyorientated in their approach to studying as aresult of their attendance at Peer Supportsessions. It is argued that these resultssuggest that the outcomes and operation of thisPeer Support scheme were influenced by thecontext in which it operated. Two implicationsof these findings are discussed.
- Ashwin, P. (in press). Peer facilitation and how it contributes to the development of a more social view of learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education.
- Bidgood, P. (1994). The success of Supplemental Instruction: The statistical evidence. In C. Rust & J. Wallace, eds, Helping Students to Learn from Each Other: Supplemental Instruction. Birmingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.
- Blanc, R.A., DeBuhr, L.E. & Martin, D.C. (1983). Breaking the attrition cycle: The effects of Supplemental Instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. Journal of Higher Education 54: 80-90.
- Bridgham, R.G. & Scarborough, S. (1992). Effects of Supplemental Instruction in selected medical school science courses. Academic Medicine 67: 569-571.
- Bryngfors, L. & Bruzell-Nilsson, M. (1997). An Experimental Project with the Method of Supplemental Instruction. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
- Burmeister, S.L., Carter, J.M., Hockenberger, L.R., Kenney, P.A., McLaren, A. & Nice, D.L. (1994). Supplemental Instruction sessions in college algebra and calculus. In D.C Martin & D.R Arendale, eds, Supplemental Instruction: Increasing Achievement and Retention. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 60 (Winter). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Center for Supplemental Instruction (1998). Supplemental Instruction: Review of Research Concerning the Effectiveness of SI from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and other Institutions from across the United States. Kansas City: University of Missouri-Kansas City.
- Clarke, R.M. (1986). Students' approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: A cross-sectional study. British Journal of Educational Psychology 56: 309-321.
- Congos, D.H. & Schoeps, N. (1993). Does Supplemental Instruction really work and what is it anyway? Studies in Higher Education 18: 165-176.
- Entwistle, N.J. (1997). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N.J. Entwistle, eds, The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
- Entwistle, N.J. & Ramsden P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
- Goldschmid, B. & Goldschmid, M.L. (1976). Peer teaching in higher education: A review. Higher Education 5: 9-33.
- Goodlad, S. & Hirst, B. (1989). Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching. London: Kogan Page.
- Healey, C.E. (1994). Supplemental Instruction. A model for supporting student learning. In H.C. Foot, C.J. Howe, A. Anderson, A.K. Tolmie & D.A. Warden, eds, Group and Interactive Learning. Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications.
- Johnson, C. (1995). Peer tutoring in economics at the University of Melbourne. In S. Goodlad, ed., Students as Tutors and Mentors. London: Kogan Page.
- Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Davies, H., McKay, J. & Stott, V. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the Study Process Questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 23: 141-157.
- Kenney, P.A. (1989). Effects of Supplemental Instruction on student performance in a collegelevel mathematics course. A paper presented at Meeting of the American Educational Association, March.
- Kenney, P.A. & Kallison, J.M. (1994). Research studies on the effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction in mathematics. In D.C Martin & D.R Arendale, eds, Supplemental Instruction: Increasing Achievement and Retention. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 60 (Winter). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Lundeberg, M. (1990). Supplemental Instruction in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 145-155.
- Lundeberg, M.A. & Moch, S. (1995). The influence of social interaction on cognition: connected learning in science. Journal of Higher Education 66: 312-334.
- Martin, D.C. & Arendale, D.R., eds (1993). Supplemental Instruction: Improving First-Year Student Success in High-Risk Courses, 2nd edn. Columbia, SC: National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience and Students in Transition.
- McCarthy, A., Bridget, S. & Cosser, M. (1997). Assessing the effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction: A critique and a case study. Studies in Higher Education 22: 221-231.
- McMillin, J. (1993). Adapting Supplemental Instruction to English composition classes. In D.C. Martin & D.R. Arendale, eds, Supplemental Instruction: Increasing Achievement and Retention. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 60 (Winter). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Norton, L.S. & Crowley, C.M. (1995). Can students be helped to learn how to learn? An evaluation of an 'Approaches to Learning' programme for first year degree students. Higher Education 29: 307-328.
- Price, M. & Rust, C. (1994). Introducing SI in business courses in a modular programme. In C. Rust & J. Wallace, eds, Helping Students to Learn from Each Other: Supplemental Instruction. Birmingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.
- Price, M. & Rust, C. (1995). Laying firm foundations: The long-term benefits of Supplemental Instruction for students on large introductory courses. Innovations in Education and Training International 32: 123-130.
- Ramsden, P. & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology 51: 368-383.
- Ramsden, P., Martin, E. & Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils' approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 59: 129-142.
- Richardson, J.T.E. (1990). Reliability and replicability of the approaches to studying questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education 15: 155-168.
- Rye, P.D., Wallace, J. & Bidgood, P. (1993). Instructions in learning skills: An integrated approach. Medical Education 27: 470-473.
- Topping, K. (1996). Effective Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education. Birmingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.
- Watkins, D. & Hattie, J. (1985). Longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning 4: 127-141.
- Whitman, N.A. (1988). Peer Teaching: To Teach is to Learn Twice. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
- Zerger, S. (1994). Supplemental Instruction in content areas: humanities. In D.C. Martin & D.R. Arendale, eds, Supplemental Instruction: Increasing Achievement and Retention. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 60 (Winter). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Peer Support: Relations between the context, process and outcomes for the students who are supported
Volume 31, Issue 3 , pp 159-173
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- approaches to studying
- further education
- Peer Learning
- peer support
- Supplemental Instruction (SI)
- Industry Sectors
- Paul Ashwin (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute for the Advancement of University Learning, University of Oxford, Littlegate House, St Ebbe's Street, Oxford, OX1 1PT, UK