Men's Reports of Nonconsensual Sexual Interactions with Women: Prevalence and Impact
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Two studies examined the prevalence and emotional impact of men's nonconsensual sexual interactions with women. The first study included a sample of 247 heterosexual men with a mean age of 18.3 years. The second study was a replication with a sample of 153 heterosexual men with a mean age of 22.3 years. All respondents completed a measure of nonconsensual sexual interactions including the use of three aggressive strategies (physical force, exploitation of the man's incapacitated state, and verbal pressure) and three forms of unwanted sexual contact (kissing/petting, sexual intercourse, and oral sex). In addition, the relationship to the female initiator was explored. For each type of nonconsensual sexual interaction, respondents indicated the affective impact of the experience. In Study 1, 25.1% of respondents reported at least one incident of nonconsensual sex with a woman and 23.9% reported attempts by women to make them engage in nonconsensual sexual activity. In Study 2, the overall prevalence rate for completed nonconsensual sexual interactions was 30.1%, and 23.5% of the men reported attempts at making them engage in nonconsensual sex. In both samples, exploiting the man's inability to offer resistance was the most frequently reported aggressive strategy. Kissing/petting was the most frequently reported unwanted sexual activity, followed by sexual intercourse and oral sex. Prevalence rates were higher for nonconsensual sex with an (ex-)partner or friend than for nonconsensual sex with an unknown women. Ratings of affective impact revealed that men rated their nonconsensual experiences as moderately upsetting. The findings are discussed in the light of previous studies on men's unwanted sexual experiences and the extant literature on women's nonconsensual sexual interactions with men.
- Anderson, P. B., & Aymami, R. (1993). Reports of female initiation of sexual contact: Male and female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 335–342.
- Anderson, P. B., & Struckman-Johnson, C. (Eds.). (1998). Sexually aggressive women. New York: Guilford Press.
- Baier, J., Rosenzweig, M., & Whipple, E. (1991). Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization of university students. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 272–285.
- Black, C. A., & DeBlassie, R. R. (1993). Sexual abuse in male children and adolescents: Indicators, effects, and treatment. Adolescence, 28, 123–133.
- Briere, J. N., & Runtz, M. (1993). Childhood sexual abuse: Long-term sequelae and implications for psychological assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 312–330.
- Byers, E. S., & O'sullivan, L. F. (1998). Similar but different: Men's and women's experiences of sexual coercion. In P. B. Anderson & C. Struckman-Johnson (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women (pp. 144–168). New York: Guilford Press.
- Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 203–214.
- Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.
- Hogben, M., Byrne, D., & Hamburger, M. E. (1996). Coercive hetero-sexual sexuality in dating relationships of college students: Implications of differential male–female experiences. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O'Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion (pp. 69–78). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
- King, M., Coxell, A., & Mezey, G. (2002). Sexual molestation of males: Associations with psychological disturbance. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 153–157.
- Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
- Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.
- Krah´ e, B. (2001). The social psychology of aggression. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
- Krah´ e, B., Sch¨ utze, S., Fritsche, I., & Waizenh¨ ofer, E. (2000). The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 142–150.
- Landesschulamt Berlin. (2001). Schulabg¨ anger aus ¨ offentlichen und pri-vaten Schulen nach Schulart und Qualifikation. [School leavers of public and private schools by type of school and qualification]. Berlin, Germany: Landesschulamt.
- Lane, K., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45–59.
- Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles, 40, 295–308.
- Lott, B., Reilly, M., & Howard, D. (1982). Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community study. Signs, 8, 296–319.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of un-wanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.
- O'sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., & Finkelman, L. (1998). A comparison of male and female college students' experiences of sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 177–195.
- Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689–701.
- Rind, B., & Tromovich, P. (1997). A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237–255.
- Rind, B., Tromovich, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). Ameta-analytic exam-inations of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22–53.
- Sandberg, G., Jackson, T., & Petretic-Jackson, P. (1987). College students' attitudes regarding sexual coercion and aggression: De-veloping educational and preventive strategies. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 302–311.
- Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117–131.
- Sorenson, S. B., & Siegel, J. M. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and sexual assault: Findings from a Los Angeles study. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 93–104.
- Spitzberg, B. H. (1998). Sexual coercion in dating relationships. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of close relation-ships (pp. 179–232). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Spitzberg, B. H. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14, 241–260.
- Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.
- Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1998). The dynamics and impact of sexual coercion of men by women. In P. B. Anderson & C. Struckman-Johnson (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women (pp. 121–143). New York: Guilford Press.
- Waldner-Haugrud, L. K., & Magruder, B. (1995). Male and female sexual victimization in dating relationships: Gender differences in coercion techniques and outcomes. Violence and Victims, 10, 203–215.
- Men's Reports of Nonconsensual Sexual Interactions with Women: Prevalence and Impact
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 32, Issue 2 , pp 165-175
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- sexual aggression
- men's nonconsensual sex
- Industry Sectors