Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 411–427

Operational Definitions and Assessment of Higher-Order Cognitive Constructs

Authors

  • Robert L. Williams
    • Psychoeducational StudiesThe University of Tennessee
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1022065517997

Cite this article as:
Williams, R.L. Educational Psychology Review (1999) 11: 411. doi:10.1023/A:1022065517997

Abstract

The educational psychology literature is replete with references to higher-order cognitive constructs, such as critical thinking and creativity. Presumably, these constructs represent the primary processes and outcomes that educators should promote in students. For these constructs to be maximally useful, they must be transformed into specific operational definitions that lead to reliable and valid assessment strategies. Minimizing overlap in the definitions and assessment of different concepts would contribute to an orderly accumulation of knowledge about the constructs in question. The ideal would be for each construct to have a definition that is distinct from the definitions of other cognitive constructs. Although higher-order cognitive constructs have much surface appeal, their utility is tied to the clarity and fidelity of their definitions and assessment procedures.

operational definitionscognitive constructsassessmentcritical thinkingcreativity
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999