Abstract
In this study we examine responses to the recent expansion of information technology in two rural Minnesota towns. One of these towns took a cooperative approach to technology access, developing a community electronic network, while the other town relied on a more individualistic, entrepreneurial model. The present study examines citizens' attitudes concerning social, political, and technological issues in these two communities, with the goal of uncovering what kinds of attitudes and resources citizens need to have in order to help support and sustain a community electronic network. Structural equation modeling is used to specify the relationships among individuals' economic, political, and social resources, technology ownership and use, and awareness of and support for the community network. Drawing on a theory of social capital, we consider the relative importance of privately- oriented social engagement versus publicly- oriented political engagement in relation to collective outcomes. Our analysis shows that in the town with the broadly- based community electronic network, individuals' political as well as economic resources are linked to knowledge and use of computer resources, whereas in the comparison community, economic stratification alone drives computer access. The implications of these findings for issues of equity, access to technology, and the development of strong community ties are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, Robert H., Bikson, Tora K., Law, Sally Ann., and Mitchell, Bridger M. (1995). Universal Access to E-Mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications. (Rand Report MR-650-MF). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Bollen, Kenneth A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
Booth, John, and Richard, Patricia Bayer (1998). Civil society, political capital, and democratization in Central America. Journal of Politics 60: 780–800.
Borgida, Eugene, Sullivan, John L., Oxendine, Alina, Jackson, Melinda S., Riedel, Eric, and Gangl, Amy (2002). Civic culture meets the digital divide: the role of community electronic networks.” Journal of Social Issues 58: 125–141.
Browne, Michael W., and Cudeck, Robert (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models pp. 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Calabrese, Andrew, and Borchert, Mark (1996). Prospects for electronic democracy in the United States: rethinking communications and social policy. Media, Culture, and Society 18: 249–268.
Cohill, Andrew Michael (1997). Success factors in Blacksburg electronic village. In Andrew Michael Cohill and Andrea Lee Kavanaugh (eds.), Community Networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia pp. 297–318. Norwood, MA: Artech House Publishers.
Coleman, James S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.
Coleman, James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coover, Dee, and Delcourt, Marcia A. (1992). Construct and criterion-related validity of the adult-attitudes toward computers survey for a sample of professional nurses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 130–140.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Foley, Michael W., and Edwards, Bob (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy 7: 38–52.
Foley, Michael W., and Edwards, Bob (1997). Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate. American Behavioral Scientist 40: 550–561.
Fuchs, Ester R., Minnite, Lorraine C., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1999). Political capital and political participation. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 15-17.
Fukuyama, Francis (1995). Now listen, net freaks, it's not who you know, but who you trust. Forbes ASAP December 4, 1995, p. S80.
Gangl, Amy, Oxendine, Alina, Jackson, Melinda S., Riedel, Eric, Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene (2000). The role of community electronic networks in bridging the digital divide. Paper presented at the International Society of Political Psychology 23rd Annual Scientific Meeting, Seattle, WA, July 1-4.
Guthrie, K. Kendall, and Dutton, William H. (1992). The politics of citizen access technology: the development of public information utilities in four cities. Policy Studies Journal 20: 574–597.
00.doc.pdf
Kling, Rob (1996). Synergies and competition between life in cyberspace and face-to-face communities. Social Science Computer Review 14: 50–54.
Knack, Stephen. (2000). Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States. Policy Research Working Paper 2504. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Development Research Group.
La Due Lake, Robert, and Huckfeldt, Robert (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology 19: 567–584.
Laguna, Kerrie, and Babcock, Renee L. (1997). Computer anxiety in young and older adults: implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior 13: 317–326.
Levi, Margaret (1996). Social and unsocial capital: a review essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work. Politics &Society 24: 45–55.
Minkoff, Debra C. (1997). Producing social capital: national social movements and civil society. American Behavioral Scientist 40: 606–619.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (July 1995). Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the “Have Nots” in Rural and Urban America. [On-line] Available: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (July 1998). Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. [On-line] Available: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (November 1999). Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. [On-line] Available: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (February 2002). A Nation Online: How Americans are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. [On-line] Available: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/index.html
Oxendine, Alina, Borgida, Eugene, Sullivan, John L., Jackson, Melinda S., and Schneider, Monica (2002). The importance of trust and comminity in developing and maintaining a community electronic network. Manuscript under review in the International Journal of Human Computer Studies.
Pew Internet Project. (2001). Internet tracking report: more online, doing more.” [Online] Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (1999). The internet news audience goes ordinary. [On-line] Available: http://www.people-press.org/tech98sum.htm
Pinto, John N., and Nickell, Gary S. (1987). The computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior 2: 301–306.
Popovich, Paula M., Hyde, Karen R., Zakrajsek, Todd, and Blumer, Catherine (1987). The development of the attitudes toward computer usage scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 47: 261–269.
Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon &Schuster.
Rogers, Everett M., Collins-Jarvis, Lori, and Schmitz, Joseph (1994). The PEN project in Santa Monica: interactive communications, equality, and political action. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45: 401–410.
Rosen, Larry D., and Weil, Michelle M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior 11: 9–31.
Shields, Mark A. (1998). Introduction to special issues: Equality and inequality in information societies. Social Science Computer Review 16: 349–352.
Skocpol, Theda (1996). Unraveling from above. The American Prospect 25 (March-April): 20–25.
Times Mirror. (1994). Technology in the American Household. Los Angeles: Times Mirror Center for the People and the Press.
Tsagarousianou, Roza (1998). Electronic democracy and the public sphere: opportunities and challenges. In Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds.), Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civic Networks pp. 152–166. London: Routledge.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Virnoche, Mary E. (1998). The seamless web and communications equity: the shaping of a community network. Science, Technology, &Human Values 23: 199–220.
Wellman, Barry, Salaff, Janet, Dimitrova, Dimitrina, Garton, Laura, Gulia, Milena, and Haythornthwaite, Caroline (1996). Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 213–238.
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B. Alwin, D., and Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1977 pp. 84–136. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wresch, William. (1996). Disconnected: Haves and Have-nots in the Information Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sullivan, J.L., Borgida, E., Jackson, M.S. et al. A Tale of Two Towns: Assessing the Role of Political Resources in a Community Electronic Network. Political Behavior 24, 55–84 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020947005847
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020947005847