Skip to main content
Log in

Why the Protestors are AgainstCorporate Globalization

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally believed by governing political parties, economists, business people and other believers in global market doctrine that those who oppose "free trade agreements" are misled, uninformed and "do not really know what they are protesting against". At the same time, the opponents of these transnational trade-and-investment restructurings have diverse concerns ranging from loss of democratic sovereignty, labour rights and environmental protection of majority-world oppression, the growth of poverty and inequality, and global cultural homogenization. The following analysis integrates the growing multitude of critical attacks on these extra-parliamentary agreements into a systematic anatomy of the latter's underlying structure whose regulating principles are not yet recognised or debated in business, political or economic circles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMurtry, J. Why the Protestors are AgainstCorporate Globalization. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 201–205 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020529217567

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020529217567

Keywords

Navigation