Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer Control and Empowerment: A Primer

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces consumer empowerment as a promising research area. Going beyond lay wisdom that more control is always better, we outline several hypotheses concerning (a) the factors that influence the perception of empowerment, and (b) the consequences of greater control and the subjective experience of empowerment on consumer satisfaction and confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, David E. (1982). ''Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty,'' Operations Research, 30, 961–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard H. Thaler. (2001). ''How Much is Investor Autonomy Worth?,'' Working Paper, UCLA.

  • Carmon, Ziv, Klaus Wertenbroch, and Marcel Zeelenberg. (2002). ''Why Some Choices Don't Make You Feel as Good as They Should: Post-Decision Effects of Pre-Decision Adaptation,'' INSEAD Working Paper.

  • Dhar, Ravi. (1997). ''Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,'' Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Daniel T., and Timothy D. Wilson. (2000). ''Miswanting: Some Problems in the Forecasting of Future Affective States.'' In J. Forgas (ed.), Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect and Social Cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourville, John T., and Dilip Soman. (2000). ''Consumer Choice Behavior Among Wide Assortments: Is More Choice Always Better?'' Harvard Business School Working Paper 99–102.

  • Heath, Chip, Richard P. Larrick, and George Wu. (1999). ''Goals As Reference Points,'' Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Sheena S., and Mark R. Lepper. (2000). ''When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 995–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. (1994). ''New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption,'' Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, Asher, Sarah Lichtenstein, and Barauch Fischhoff. (1980). ''Reasons for Confidence,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, David. (1979). ''A Representation Theorem for Preference for Flexibility,'' Econometrica, 47, 565–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Ellen J., and Judith Rodin. (1976). ''The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged:AField Experiment in an Institutional Setting,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Ellen J. (1983). The Psychology of Control. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, George, Leigh Thompson, and Max Bazerman. (1989). ''Social Utility and Decision Making in Intertemporal Contexts,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishnan, A. V., and Frank R. Kardes. (2001). ''Persistent Preferences for Product Attributes: The Effects of Initial Choice Context and Uninformative Experience,'' Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, Rebecca K., Barbara E. Kahn, and Daniel Kahneman. (1999). ''Choosing Less-Preferred Experiences for the Sake of Variety,'' Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Daniel, and George Loewenstein. (1995). ''Diversification Bias: Explaining the Discrepancy in Variety Seeking Between Combined and Separated Choices,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., M. F. Weigold, and J. R. Hallam. (1990). ''Self-Serving Attributions in Social Context: Effects of Self-Esteem and Social Pressure,'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 855–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, Tibor. (1992). The Joyless Economy: The Psychology of Human Satisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Eldar Shafir. (1992). ''Choice Under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Choice,'' Psychological Science, 3, 358–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertenbroch, Klaus. (1998). ''Consumption Self-Control by Rationing Purchase Quantities of Virtue and Vice,'' Marketing Science, 17, 317–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., D. J. Lisle, J. W. Schooler, S. D. Hodges, K. J. Klaaren, and S. J. LaFleur. (1993). ''Introspecting About Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction,'' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331–339.3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Wathieu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wathieu, L., Brenner, L., Carmon, Z. et al. Consumer Control and Empowerment: A Primer. Marketing Letters 13, 297–305 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020311914022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020311914022

Navigation