Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical streams in Marginalized Peoples' Knowledge(s): Systems, asystems, and Subaltern Knowledge(s)

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two distinct theoreticalstreams flowing in the investigation,documentation, and dissemination ofMarginalized Peoples' Knowledge(s) (MPK)are identified and a third suggested.Systems thinking, which originally coined theterm Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS),continues to predominate the growinginterdisciplinary interest in MPK. Thisapproach has tended to view knowledge or itsproduction based on systemic principles.The asystems approach challenges theusefulness of MPK as a systemsconstruct. Its central proposition is that MPKdoes not always represent a coherent system ofknowledge with underlying principles.Asystemists tend to prefer the term LocalKnowledge (LK) and approach the subject fromvery different, even opposing, epistemologicalassumptions. Although both the systemsand asystems research streams are oftenconcerned with power, an in-depth explorationof power-issues is not inevitably integral toeither approach. A third Subaltern Knowledge(s)(SK) perspective is suggested. The SK termembodies a central condition of many LKsvis-à-vis the scientific/Western knowledgeestablishment – that of being marginalizedbut resisting or with the potential to resistthis process. More benign terms in literature(IK, LK, Rural Peoples' Knowledge (RPK), etc.)fail to make this condition explicit. Such aconceptual recasting overtly invites aconsideration of the intertwined nature ofpower and knowledge in the exploration ofMPK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995). "Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge." Development and Change 26: 413–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1991). "Indigenous agricultural knowledge systems, human interests, and critical analysis: Reflections on farmer organization in ecuador." Agriculture and Human Values 18(1-2): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1993). "Rural People's Knowledge(s), farmer organizations and rural development: Implications for agricultural research and extension." Network Paper 41, Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension). London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann (1972). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., D. Breedlove and P. Raven (1974). Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification: An Introduction to the Botanical Ethnography of a Mayan-Speaking Community in Highland Chiapas. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. D. and E. Clay (1981). "Sources of innovation in agricultural technology." World Development 9(4): 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S. (1986). "Exchange of varieties and information between aguaruna manioc cultivators." American Anthropologist 88: 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., D. M. Warren, and O. Werner (eds.) (1980). Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems and Development. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, A. and P. Keating (1988). "Going monoclonal: Art, science and magic in the day-to-day use of hybridoma technology." Social Problems 35: 244–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, K. (1991). "Systems of knowledge as systems of domination: The limitations of established meaning." Agriculture and Human Values 8(1-2): 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp (eds.) (1989). Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. and J. H. Fujimura (eds.) (1992). The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. P. (1993). "Segmentary Knowledge(s): A whalsay sketch." In M. Hobart (ed.) An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance (pp. 31-42). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. C. (1954). The Relation of Hanunóo Culture to the Plant World. Ph.D. dissertation. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schlippe, P. (1956). Shifting Cultivation in Africa: The Zande System of Agriculture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead, J. (1992). "Representing knowledge: The 'New Farmer' in research fashions." In J. Pottier (ed.), Practising Development: Social Science Perspectives (pp. 187–204). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. and R.Welsh (1995). "Feminist knowledge claims, Local Knowledge(s), and gender divisions of agricultural labor: Constructing a successor science." Rural Sociology 60(1): 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavier, J. M., A. de Jesus, and C. S. Navarro (1995). "The regional program for the promotion of Indigenous Knowledge(s) in Asia." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha (eds.), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems (pp. 479–487). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). "Afterword: The subject and power." In H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. M. B. Ramos (trans.). New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación Sabiduría Indígena and B. Kothari (1997). "Rights to the benefits of research: Compensating indigenous peoples for their intellectual contribution." Human Organization 56(2): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge(s): Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith (trans. and eds.). New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., K. K. Patel, P. G. V. S. Chand, A. R. Pastakia, J. Suthar, S. Shukla, D. Koradiya, V. Chauhan, A. Raval, C. Srinivas, and R. Sinha (1996). "Participatory research: Will the koel hatch the crow's eggs?" In New Frontiers in Participatory Research and Gender Analysis (pp. 209–243). Proceedings of the International Seminar on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development, September 9-14. Cali: CGIAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., K. K. Patel, A. R. Pastakia, and P. G. V. S. Chand. 1995. "Building upon local creativity and entrepreneurship in vulnerable environments." In V. Titi and N. Singh (eds.), Empowerment for Sustainable Development: Toward Operational Strategies (pp. 112–137). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1992). "The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences." In A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 29–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). "Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective." Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, T. (1995). "Indigenous Knowledge(s), emancipation and alienation." Knowledge and Policy 8(1): 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobart, M. (1993). "Introduction: The growth of ignorance?" In M. Hobart (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance (pp. 1–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, M. and R. Chambers (1980). "Indigenous Technical Knowledge(s): Analysis, implications, and issues." In D. Brokensha, D. M. Warren, and O. Werner (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems and Development (pp. 323–334). Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (1991). "Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: Local Knowledge(s) for an alternative agriculture." Rural Sociology 56(4): 519–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, B. (1995). "From oral to written: Documentation of knowledge in Ecuador." Indigenous Knowledge(s) and Development Monitor 3(2): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, B. (1996). "Strands of the Ecuadorian Indian movement: The case of FICI and FICAPI in imbabura province." Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 21(42): 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, B. (forthcoming). " The invisible queen in the plant kingdom: Gender perspectives in ethnobotany." In P. L. Howard (ed.), Women and Plants: Case Studies on Gender Relations in Biodiversity Management and Conservation. London: Zed Press.

  • Kothari, B. and Unión de Organizaciones y Comunidades Indígenas de Angochagua, La Esperanza, y Caranqui (UNOCIAE-C) (1993). Ñucanchic Panpa Janpicuna: plantas medicinales del campo. Quito, Ecuador: Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1986). "Research as praxis." Harvard Educational Review 56(3): 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (ed.) (1991). A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Sociological Review Monograph 38. London: Routledge.

  • Leeuwis, C., N. Long, and M. Villarreal (1990). "Equivocations on knowledge systems theory: An actor-oriented critique." Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer 3(3): 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, G. (1989). "Introduction." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge( s) Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change 11 (pp. 1–2). Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, C. M. (1989). "Toward a knowledge of Local Knowledge(s) and its importance for agricultural RD&E." Agriculture and Human Values Summer: 4–12.

  • Mohanty, C. T. (1991). "Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses." In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres (eds.), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. A. and C. Sachs (2000). "Standpoint epistemology and the uses of self-reflection in feminist ethnography: Lessons for rural sociology." Rural Sociology 65(2): 194–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, W. E. and C. Butler Flora (1992). "Selling appropriate development vs. selling-out rural communities: Empowerment and control in Indigenous Knowledge(s) discourse." Agriculture and Human Values 9: 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophir, A. and S. Shapin (1991). "The place of knowledge: A methodological survey." Science in Context 4: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1984). "Theory in anthropology since the sixties." Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawluk, R. R., J. A. Sandor, and J. A. Tabor (1990). "The role of indigenous soil knowledge in agricultural development." Soil and Water Conservation 47(4): 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, R. E. (1987). "Farmers and experimentation." Discussion Paper 21, Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension). London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, R. E. and A. Bebbington (1995). "Farmers who experiment: An untapped resource for agricultural research and development." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha (eds.), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems (pp. 296–307). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1993). "Cultivation: knowledge or performance." In M. Hobart (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance (pp. 61–78). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1992). "The emergence of knowledge systems thinking: A changing perception of relationships among innovation, knowledge process and configuration." knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of knowledge Transfer and Utilization 5(1): 42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. and P. Engel (1989). "IKS and knowledge management: Utilizing Indigenous Knowledge(s) in institutional knowledge systems." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change 11 (pp. 101–115). Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power: Towards a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, C. (1996). Gendered Fields: Rural Women, Agriculture and Environment. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slikkerveer, L. J. (1989). "Changing values and attitudes of social and natural scientists towards indigenous peoples and their knowledge systems." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change 11 (pp. 121–137). Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slikkerveer, L. J. (1995). "INDAKS: A bibliography and database on Indigenous Agricultural Knowledge Systems and sustainable development in the tropics." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha (eds.), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems (pp. 512–516). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1990). "The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of anselm strauss." In D. Maines (ed.), Social Organization and Social Processes: Essays in Honour of Anselm Strauss. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. and I. Scoones (1994). "Challenging the populist perspective: Rural People's Knowledge(s), agricultural research, and extension practice." Agriculture and Human Values 11: 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (1985). "Flies and germs: A geography of knowledge." In D. Gregory and J. Urry (eds.), Social Relations and Spatial Structures (pp. 366–403). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A. (1989). "Legitimizing Local Knowledge(s): 'Scientized packages' or empowerment for third world people." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change 11 (pp. 138–153). Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D. (1993). "Local Knowledge(s) and comparative scientific traditions." iKnowledge and Policy Fall/Winter: 29-54.

  • van Beek, W. E. A. (1993). "Processes and limitations of dogon agricultural knowledge." In M. Hobart (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance (pp. 43–60). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. B. (1987). "Traditional knowledge systems: The recognition of indigenous history and science." Saskatchewan Indian Federated College Journal 2(2): 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. D. (1989). "The impact of nineteenth century social science in establishing negative values and attitudes towards Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge( s) Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change 11 (pp. 171–183). Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. D. (1991a). "Using Indigenous Knowledge(s) in agricultural development." World Bank Discussion Paper 127. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. D. (ed.) (1991b). "Indigenous Agricultural Knowledge Systems and Development." Agriculture and Human Values 8(1-2): 1–184.

  • Warren, M. D. and G. McKiernan (1995). "CIKARD: A global approach to documenting Indigenous Knowledge(s) for development." In M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha (eds.), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems (pp. 426–434). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. D., L. J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha (eds.) (1995). The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. D., L. J. Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.) (1989). Indigenous Knowledge(s) Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, Studies in Technology and Social Change 11. Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster (1986). Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. (1977). "Science is social relations." Radical Science Journal 5: 165–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. (1979). "Science is a labor process." Science for People 43/44: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. (1985). "Is nature a labor process?" In L. Levidow and B. Young (eds.), Science Technology and the Labor Process. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ravi J. Matthai Center for Educational Innovation, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India

    Brij Kothari

Authors
  1. Brij Kothari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kothari, B. Theoretical streams in Marginalized Peoples' Knowledge(s): Systems, asystems, and Subaltern Knowledge(s). Agriculture and Human Values 19, 225–237 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019942727343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019942727343

Search

Navigation