[1]
J.F. Allen, AI growing up — the changes and opportunities, AI Magazine 19(4) (1998) 13-23.
Google Scholar[2]
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski, Wisely non rational — a categorical view of emotional cognitive artificial perceptions, in: Papers from the 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium: Emotional and Intelligent — The Tangled Knot of Cognition, ed. D. Cañamero, Orlando, FL, October 1998 (AAAI Press, 1998) pp. 7-12.
[3]
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski, Categorical tools for perceptive design: Formalizing the artificial inner eye, in:
Computational Models of Creative Design IV, eds. J.S. Gero and M.L. Maher, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Australia (1999) pp. 321-354.
Google Scholar[4]
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski and D. Lehmann, From environments to representations — a mathematical theory of artificial perceptions, Artif. Intell. 102(2) (1998) 187-247.
MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar[5]
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski and D. Lehmann, Introducing the mathematical category of artificial perceptions, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 23 (3,4) (1998) 267-298.
MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar[6]
A. Asperti and G. Longo,
Categories, Types, and Structures (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
Google Scholar[7]
M. Barr and C. Wells,
Category Theory for Computing Science (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995).
Google Scholar[8]
J. Barwise and J. Seligman, Information Flow, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 44 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[9]
E.A. Bender,
Mathematical Methods in Artificial Intelligence (IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1995).
Google Scholar[10]
M. Black, Metaphor. in:
Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, ed. M. Johnson (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1981) pp. 63-82. A reprint of an article from 1955.
Google Scholar[11]
S. Blackburn, Dictionary of Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1996).
[12]
F. Borceux, A Handbook of Categorical Algebra (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
[13]
E. Boros, P.L. Hammer, T. Ibaraki, A. Kogan, E. Mayoraz and I. Muchnik, An implementation of logical analysis of data, Rutcor Research Report RRR 22-96, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (July 1996).
Google Scholar[14]
H. Caygill,
A Kant Dictionary (Blackwell Publishers, Great Britain, 1995).
Google Scholar[15]
A. Clark,
Being There, Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).
Google Scholar[16]
R.L. Crole, Categories for Types (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
[17]
M.A. Croon and F.J.R. Van de Vijver, eds.,
Viability of Mathematical Models in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Swets and Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, 1994).
Google Scholar[18]
E.R. Doughherty and C.R. Giardina,
Mathematical Methods for Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).
Google Scholar[19]
S. Eilenberg and S. Mac Lane, General theory of natural equivalences, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (1945) 231-294.
MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar[20]
B. Falkenhainer, K.D. Forbus and D. Gentner, The structure-mapping engine, Artif. Intell. 41(1) (1990) 1-63.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar[21]
G. Fauconnier, Mappings in Thought and Language (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[22]
R.M. French,
The Subtlety of Sameness — A Theory and Computer Model of Analogy Making, A Bradford Book, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
Google Scholar[23]
M. Genesereth and N.J. Nilsson,
Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1987).
Google Scholar[24]
D. Gentner, The mechanisms of analogical learning, in: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, eds. S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (Cambridge University Press, 1989) pp. 199-241.
[25]
D. Gentner, Analogy in: A Companion to Cognitive Science (Blackwell, 1998) chapter II(1), pp. 107-113.
[26]
S.M. Glynn, R. Duit and R.B. Thiele, Teaching science with analogies: A strategy for constructing knowledge, in:
Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice, eds. S.M. Glynn and R. Duit (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1995) chapter 11.
Google Scholar[27]
N. Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (Harvard University Press, 4th edition, 1983).
[28]
S. Harnad, The symbol grounding problem, Phys. D 42 (1990) 335-346.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar[29]
H. Herrlich and G.E. Strecker, Category Theory (Allyn and Bacon, 1973).
[30]
P.G. Hewitt,
Conceptual Physics — The Highschool Physics Program (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 2nd edition, 1992).
Google Scholar[31]
D. Hofstadter, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies — Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought (Basic Books, 1995).
[32]
D. Holland and N. Quinn, eds.,
Cultural Models in Language and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987).
Google Scholar[33]
K.J. Holyoak and P. Thagard,
Mental Leaps — Analogy in Creative Thought, A Bradford Book (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
Google Scholar[34]
E. Hutchins,
Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
Google Scholar[35]
B. Indurkhya, Metaphor and Cognition (Kluwer Academic, 1992).
[36]
B. Indurkhya, Metaphor as change of representation: an artificial intelligence perspective, J. Exper. Theor. Artif. Intell. 9(1) (1997) 1-36.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar[37]
I. Kant,
Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis/Cambridge, 1992). Translated by J.W. Ellington. Originally published in 1785 as “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”.
Google Scholar[38]
J. Kolodner,
Case-Based Reasoning (Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1993).
Google Scholar[39]
G. Lakoff, The death of dead metaphor,
Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2(2) (1987) 143-147.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar[40]
G. Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things — What Categories Reveal About the Mind (The University of Chicago Press, 1987).
[41]
G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (The University of Chicago Press, 1980).
[42]
F.W. Lawvere, Tools for the advancement of objective logic: Closed categories and toposes, in: The Logical Foundations of Cognition, eds. J. Macnamara and G.E. Reyes, (Oxford University Press, 1994) pp. 43-55.
[43]
F.W. Lawvere and S.H. Schanuel, Conceptual Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[44]
D. Leake, ed., Case Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1996).
[45]
J. Lukasiewicz, Many-valued systems of propositional logic (1930), in: Polish Logic, ed. S. McCall (Oxford University Press, 1967).
[46]
J. Lukasiewicz, On 3-valued logic (1920), in: Polish Logic, ed. S. McCall (Oxford University Press, 1967).
[47]
S. MacLane, Categories for the Working Mathematician (Springer-Verlag, 1972).
[48]
F. Magnan and G.E. Reyes, Category theory as a conceptual tool in the study of cognition, in: The Logical Foundations of Cognition, eds. J. Macnamara and G.E. Reyes (Oxford University Press, 1994) pp. 57-90.
[49]
M. Minsky, ed., Semantic Information Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1968).
[50]
M. Mitchell,
Analogy Mapping as Perception — A Computer Model, A Bradford Book (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).
Google Scholar[51]
D.J. Moser, Sze-chuan pepper and Coca-Cola: The translation of Gödel, Escher, Bach into Chinese, Babel 37(2) (1991) 75-95.
Google Scholar[52]
B.C. Pierce,
Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
Google Scholar[53]
D. Ross, Metaphor, Meaning and Cognition (Peter Lang, 1993).
[54]
A. Sloman, Architectural requirements for human-like agents, both natural and artificial (what sorts of machines can love?), in: Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, ed. K. Dautenhahn, Advances in Consciousness Research (John Benjamins Publishing, forthcoming).
[55]
P. Thagard,
Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996).
Google Scholar[56]
S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony, eds., Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, 1989).
[57]
R.F.C. Walters, Categories and Computer Science (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
[58]
A.J. Wells, Turing's analysis of computation and theories of cogitive architecture, Cognitive Sci. 22(3) (1998) 269-294.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar