Skip to main content
Log in

Entropy and Vacuum Radiation

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that entropy increase in thermodynamic systems can plausibly be accounted for by the random action of vacuum radiation. A recent calculation by Rueda using stochastic electrodynamics (SED) shows that vacuum radiation causes a particle to undergo a rapid Brownian motion about its average dynamical trajectory. It is shown that the magnitude of spatial drift calculated by Rueda can also be predicted by assuming that the average magnitudes of random shifts in position and momentum of a particle correspond to the lower limits of the uncertainty relation. The latter analysis yields a plausible expression for the shift in momentum caused by vacuum radiation. It is shown that when the latter shift in momentum is magnified in particle interactions, the fractional change in each momentum component is on the order of unity within a few collision times, for gases and (plausibly) for denser systems over a very broad range of physical conditions. So any system of particles in this broad range of conditions would move to maximum entropy, subject to its thermodynamic constraints, within a few collision times. It is shown that the spatial drift caused by vacuum radiation, as predicted by the above SED calculation, can be macroscopic in some circumstances, and an experimental test of this effect is proposed. Consistency of the above results with quantum mechanics is discussed, and it is shown that the diffusion constant associated with the above Brownian drift is the same as that used in stochastic interpretations of the Schrödinger equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. H.-D. Zeh, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time (Springer, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. C. W. Davies, The Physics of Time Asymmetry (University of California, Berkeley, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Prigogine, From Being to Becoming (Freeman, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Rueda, Found. Phys. Lett. 6(1), 75 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Rueda, Found. Phys. Lett. 6(2), 139 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, Am. J. Phys. 49(1), 37 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1980), §§ 2-1, 8-1, 8-6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Haken, Synergetics (Springer, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Borel, Le Hasard (Alcan, Paris, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Sornette, Eur. J. Phys. 11, 334 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. de la Peña and A. M. Cetto, The Quantum Dice: An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A 188, 198 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. G. Unruh and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 40(4), 1071 (1989); B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 45(8), 2843 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. H. Zurek and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72(16), 2508 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. E. Puthoff, Phys. Rev. A 40(9), 4857 (1989); 44(5), 3385 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Everett, III, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957). D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe(Routledge, New York, 1993). T. Etter, Int. J. Gen. Sys. (1998, in press). Decoherence is sometimes also proposed as an alternative to the collapse hypothesis, within the many-worlds interpretation of Everett; see W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44(10), 36 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. H. Bennett, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 905 (1982); Sci. Am. (Nov.), 108 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. Prigogine, Z. Naturforsch. 52a, 37 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Petrosky and M. Rosenberg, Found. Phys. 27(2), 239 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. In some cases, such as the example herein of a system with an unstable state, entropy increase could ultimately be associated with the vacuum field, because the latter is the cause of “spontaneous” decay of an unstable state ( see P. W. Milonni, The Quantum acuum (Academic Press, New York, 1994) ).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, translated by R. T. Beyer (Princeton University, Princeton, 1955, original work published 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. L ett. 65(27), 3373 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, J.E. Entropy and Vacuum Radiation. Foundations of Physics 28, 1191–1207 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018802204896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018802204896

Keywords

Navigation