Skip to main content
Log in

The Neosexual Revolution

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The affluent societies of the Western world have witnessed a tremendous cultural and social transformation of sexuality during the 1980s and 1990s, a process I refer to as the neosexual revolution. Up to now, this recoding and reassessment of sexuality has proceeded rather slowly and quietly. Yet both its real and its symbolic effects may indeed be more consequential than those brought about in the course of the rapid, noisy sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. The neosexual revolution is dismantling the old patterns of sexuality and reassembling them anew. In the process, dimensions, intimate relationships, preferences, and sexual fragments emerge, many of which had been submerged, were unnamed, or simply did not exist before. In general, sexuality has lost much of its symbolic meaning as a cultural phenomenon. Sexuality is no longer the great metaphor for pleasure and happiness, nor is it so greatly overestimated as it was during the sexual revolution. It is now widely taken for granted, much like egotism or motility. Whereas sex was once mystified in a positive sense - as ecstasy and transgression, it has now taken on a negative mystification characterized by abuse, violence, and deadly infection. While the old sexuality was based primarily upon sexual instinct, orgasm, and the heterosexual couple, neosexualities revolve predominantly around gender difference, thrills, self-gratification, and prosthetic substitution. From the vast number of interrelated processes from which neosexualities emerge, three empirically observable phenomena have been selected for discussion here: the dissociation of the sexual sphere, the dispersion of sexual fragments, and the diversification of intimate relationships. These processes go hand in hand with the commercialization and banalization of sexuality. They are looked upon as being controlled individually through the mechanisms of a fundamentally egotistical consensus morality. In conformity with the general principles at work in society, the outcome of the neosexual revolution could be described as self-disciplined and self-optimized lean sexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bataille, G. (1957). L'Érotisme, Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, an d the Problem of Domination, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex,” Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesarano, G. (1974). Manuale di Sopravvivenza. Part II: L'Insurrezione Erotica, Nani Cesarano, Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, A. (1963). Sex in Society, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannecker, M., and R. Reiche (1974). Der gewöhnliche Homosexuelle [The Everyday Homosexual] , Fischer, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1969). Ñber den Prozeβder Zivilisation [On the Process of Civilization], 2 vols, 2nd ed., Francke, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evola, J. (1958). Metafisica del Sesso, Atanòr, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). L'ordre du Discours, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la Sexualité. Tome 1: La Volonté de Savoir, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1895). Entwurf einer Psychologie [Model for a Science of Psychology]. In S. Freud, Aus den Anfängen der Psychoanalyse [From the Early Years of Psychoanalysis] , Imago, London 1950, pp. 371–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992). Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., and Money, J. (1960). Incongruous gender role: Nongenital manifestations in prepubertal boys. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 130: 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1984). Éthique de la Différence sexuelle, Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. J. (1991). Female Perversions: The Temptations of Emma Bovary, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human Sexual Response, Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1955). Hermaphroditism, gender and precocity in hyperadreno-corticism: Psychologic findings. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 96: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1985). Gender: History, theory and usage of the term in sexology and its relationship with nature/nurture. J. Sex Marital Ther. 11: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W. (1936). Die Sexualität im Kulturkampf [Sexuality on the Battlefield of Culture], Sexpol, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. (ed.) (1993). Jugendsexualität [Youth and Sexuality] , Enke, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. (1996). Das Verschwinden der Sexualmoral [The Demise of Sexual Morals], Klein, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1984). Die Mystifikation des Sexuellen [The Mystification of the Sexual], Campus, Frankfurt and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1988). Was heiβt kritische Sexualwissenschaft? [What is critical sexual science?]. Z. Sexualforsch. 1: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1989). Kritik der disziplinierten Sexualität [A Criticism of Disciplined Sexuality], Campus, Frankfurt and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1991a). Die Transsexuellen und unser nosomorpher Blick. Teil I: Zur Enttotalisierung des Transsexualismus [Transsexuals and our nosomorphic view. Part I: The detotalization of transsexualism]. Z. Sexualforsch. 4: 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1991b). Die Transsexuellen und unser nosomorpher Blick. Teil II: Zur Entpathologisierung des Transsexualismus [Transsexuals and our nosomorphic view. Part II: The depathologization of transsexualism]. Z. Sexualforsch. 4: 309–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1995a). Geschlechtswechsel [Sex Changes], Rotbuch, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1995b). Transsexueller Wunsch und zissexuelle Abwehr [Transsexual desire and cissexual defense]. Psyche 49: 811–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1995c). Anteros. In P. Weiermair (ed.), Erotic Art: From the 17th to the 20th Century, Stemmle, Kilchberg/Zurich, pp. 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1996a). Die Zerstreuung des Eros. Ñber die “neosexuelle Revolution” [The dispersion of Eros. On the “Neosexual Revolution”]. Der Spiegel 50(23): 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1996b). Die Trümmer der sexuellen Revolution [The Ruins of the Sexual Revolution]. Die Zeit 51(41): 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1997a). Kultureller Wandel der Sexualität [The Cultural Transformation of Sexuality]. In V. Sigusch (ed.), Sexuelle Störungen und ihre Behandlung [Sexual Disorders and their Treatment], 2nd ed., Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V. (1997b). Metamorphosen von Leben und Tod. Ausblick auf eine Theorie der Hylomatie [Metamorphoses of life and death. Prospects for a theory of hylomatia]. Psyche 51: 835–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V., and Schmidt, G. (1973). Jugendsexualität [Youth and Sexuality], Enke, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W. (1994). Deviance as history: The future of perversion. Arch. Sex. Behav. 23: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, R. J. (1968). Sex and Gender: Vol. I. The Development of Masculinity and Femininity, Science House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, R. J. (1975). Perversion: The Erotic Form of Hatred, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex Is Not a Natural Act and Other Essays, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussel, J. van (1975). Intimiteit [Intimacy] , Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (1994). Duerr und Elias. Scham und Gewalt in Zivilisations-prozessen [Duerr and Elias: Shame and violence in the processes of civilization]. Z. Sexualforsch. 7: 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigusch, V. The Neosexual Revolution. Arch Sex Behav 27, 331–359 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018715525493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018715525493

Navigation