Abstract
The evolution of adaptive behaviours can influence population dynamics. Conversely, population dynamics can affect both the rate and direction of adaptive evolution. This paper examines reasons why sink populations – populations maintained by immigration, preventing local extinction – might persist in the habitat repertoire of a species over evolutionary time-scales. Two such reasons correspond to standard explanations for deviations from an ideal free habitat distribution: organisms may not be free to settle in whichever habitat has the highest potential fitness, and may be constrained by costs, perceptual limitations, or mode of dispersal in the acuity of their habitat selectivity. Here, I argue that a third general reason for persistent sink populations is provided by unstable population dynamics in source habitats. I present a simple model illustrating how use of a sink habitat may be selectively advantageous, when a source population has unstable dynamics (which necessarily reflects temporal variation in local fitnesses). Species with unstable local dynamics in high-quality habitats should be selected to utilize a broader range of habitats than species with stable local dynamics, and in particular in some circumstances should utilize sink habitats. This observation has implications for the direction of niche evolution, and the likelihood of niche conservatism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahams, M.V. (1986) Patch choice under perceptual constraints: A cause for deviations from an ideal free distribution. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 409–415.
Abrams, P.A. (1996) Dynamics and interactions in food webs with adaptive foragers. In Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics (G.A. Polis and K.O. Winemiller, eds), pp. 113–121. Chapman & Hall, London.
Bull, J.J., Thompson, C., Ng, D. and Moore, R. (1987) A model for natural selection of genetic migration. Am. Nat. 129, 143–157.
Chesson, P. and Rosenzweig, M. (1991) Behavior, heterogeneity, and the dynamics of interacting species. Ecology 72, 1187–1195.
Dias, P.C. (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 326–330.
Fretwell, S.D. (1972) Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Hamilton, W.D. and May, R.M. (1977) Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269, 578–581.
Hastings, A. (1983) Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theor. Pop. Biol. 24, 244–251.
Holt, R.D. (1985) Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Pop. Biol. 28, 181–208.
Holt, R.D. (1993) Ecology at the mesoscale: The influence of regional processes on local communities. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, eds), pp. 77–88. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Holt, R.D. (1996a) Demographic constraints in evolution: Towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol. 10, 1–11.
Holt, R.D. (1996b) Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: Direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on niche evolution. Oikos 75, 182–192.
Holt, R.D. and McPeek, M.A. (1996) Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. Am. Nat. 148, 709–718.
Keddy, P.A. (1981) Experimental demography of the sand-dune annual, Cakile edentula, growing along an environmental gradient in Nova Scotia. J. Ecol. 69, 615–630.
Kennedy, M. and Gary, R. (1993) Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the Ideal Free Distribution. Oikos 68, 158–166.
MacArthur, R.H. (1972) Geographical Ecology. Harper and Row, New York.
May, R.M. and Oster, G.F. (1976) Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. Am. Nat. 110, 573–599.
McPeek, M.A. and Holt, R.D. (1992) The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140, 1010–1027.
Morris, D.W. (1991) On the evolutionary stability of dispersal to sink habitats. Am. Nat. 137, 907–911.
Pimm, S.L. (1991) The Balance of Nature? University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Pulliam, H.R. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652–661.
Pulliam, H.R. (1996) Sources and sinks: Empirical evidence and population consequences. In Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time (O.E. Rhodes Jr, R.K. Chesser and M.H. Smith, eds), pp. 45–70. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Pulliam, H.R. and Danielson, B.J. (1991) Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: A landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137, S50–S66.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1985) Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In Habitat Selection in Birds (M. Cody, ed.), pp. 517–540. Academic Press, New York.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1987) Habitat selection as a source of biological diversity. Evol. Ecol. 1, 315–330.
Seger, J. and Brockmann, H.J. (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 4, 182–211.
Sutherland, W.J., Townsend, C.R. and Patmore, J.M. (1988) A test of the ideal free distribution with unequal competitors. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 51–53.
van Baalen, M. and Sabelis, M.W. (1993) Coevolution of patch selection strategies of predator and prey and the consequences for ecological stability. Am. Nat. 142, 646–670.
Vincent, T.L. and Brown, J.S. (1989) The evolutionary response of systems to a changing environment. Appl. Math. Comput. 32, 185–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, R.D. On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evolutionary Ecology 11, 723–731 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018438403047
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018438403047