Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments
- Mark Skidmore
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper uses comprehensive data on state and local tax and spending limitations for forty-nine states between 1976 and 1990 to estimate the effects of these limits on the fiscal relationships between state and local government. Results indicate that tax and spending limits on local governments are only partially effective in reducing revenues because political agents bypass limitations by transferring revenue reliance to unconstrained revenue sources, or because unconstrained levels of government take on additional revenue responsibilities. In particular, the empirical analysis demonstrates that binding local government fiscal constraints are associated with reductions in local revenues and increases in state aid to local governments. In contrast, state government limitations are related to reductions in both state and local own source revenues.
- Bergstrom, T.C. and Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 63: 280–296.
- Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Borcherding, T. and Deacon, R. (1972). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 62: 891–901.
- Census of Governments. 1977 Taxable property values and assessments/sales, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Census of Governments. 1982 Taxable property values and assessments/sales, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Census of Governments. 1987 Taxable property values and assessments/sales, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Elder, H. (1992). Exploring the tax revolt: Analysis of the effects of state tax and expenditure limitation laws. Public Finance Quarterly 92(1): 44–63.
- Fischel, W. (1989) "Did Serrano cause proposition 13?" National Tax Journal 42(4): 465–473.
- Fisher, R. (1988). State and local public finance, Scott Foresman and Company: Glenview, Illinois.
- Hsiao, C. (1989). Analysis of panel data, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- Joyce, P.G. and Mullins, D.R. (1995). State tax and expenditure limits on local governments. Washington D.C.: Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations.
- Joyce, P.G. and Mullins, D.R. (1991). The changing fiscal structure of the state and local public sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Administration Review 51(3): 242–252.
- Kennedy, P. (1992). A guide to econometrics, MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- Ladd, H.F. (1978). An economic evaluation of state limitation on local taxing and spending powers. National Tax Journal 31(1): 1–17.
- Merriman, D. (1986). The distributional effects of New Jersey's tax and expenditure limitation. Land Economics 62(3): 353–361.
- Mullins, D.R. and Philip, G.J. (1996). Tax and expenditure limitations and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance 16(1): 20–37.
- Preston, A.E. and Ichniowski, C. (1991). A national perspective on the nature and effects of the local property tax revolt, 1976–1986. National Tax Journal 44(2): 123–145.
- Reid, G.J. (1988). How cities in California have responded to fiscal pressures since proposition 13. Public Budgeting and Finance 8(1): 20–37.
- Rueben, K. (1996). Tax limitations and government growth: The effect of state tax and expenditure limits on state and local government, mimeo.
- Rodgers, J.D. and Temple, J.A. (1996). Sales taxes, income taxes, and other non property tax revenues, in Management Policies in Local Government Finance, 4th Edition,Washington D.C: International City Management Association.
- Skidmore, M. (1994). State and local tax/expenditure and debt limitation laws: A detailed report summarizing the process of data collection, mimeo.
- Temple, J.A. (1996). Community composition and voter support for tax limitations. Southern Economics Journal 62: 1002–1016.
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Government finances, various issues, 1976 to 1992, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Significant features of fiscal federalism 1976 to 1992, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments
Volume 99, Issue 1-2 , pp 77-102
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Mark Skidmore (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Economics, Northern Illinois University, Zulauf Hall, DeKalb, IL, 60115, U.S.A