Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

A midbrain neural basis for the perceptualoscillations of binocular rivalry is suggestedon the basis of fMRI studies of rivalry andinferences from the properties of rivalry thatcannot be explained from the known propertiesof primary visual cortical (V1) neurons. Therivalry switch is proposed to activatehomologous areas of each cerebral hemispherealternately, by means of a bistable oscillatorcircuit that straddles the midline of theventral tegmentum. This bistable oscillatoroperates at the same slow rate that ischaracteristic of perceptual rivalryalternations. Whilst attempting to divert thepresent preoccupation with cortical mechanismsfor rivalry, the new proposal integrates manycortical areas, in keeping with recent evidencethat binocular rivalry involves widespreadareas of the hemispheres. By linking rivalry tointerhemispheric switching mechanisms in thisway, the new proposal for the switch makes theprediction that binocular rivalry will besubject to high level influences such as moodand motivation. These predictions are beingfulfilled, with rivalry playing an increasingrole in the diagnosis and understanding if mooddisorders, schizophrenia and other psychiatricconditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, J.,Campbell, F.W.,Fiorentini, A. andMaffei, L., 1973: The dependence of monocular rivalry on spatial frequency, Perception 2, 127-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T.J. andPurves, D., 1997: Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9905-9908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, W.,Zohary, E. andNewsome, W.T., 2001: Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: Time scales and relationship to behavior, J. Neurosci. 21, 1676-1697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloh, R.W.,Honrubia, V. andKonrad, H.R., 1976: Periodic alternating nystagmus, Brain 99: 11-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejjani, B.-P.,Damier, P.,Arnulf, I.,Thivard, L.,Bonnet, A.-M. andDormont, D., 1999: Transient acute depression induced by high-frequency deep-brain stimulation, New Engl. J. Med. 340, 1476-1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., 1989: A neural theory of binocular rivalry, Psychol. Rev. 96, 145-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.,Westendorf, D.H. andYang, Y., 1991: Discriminating binocular fusion from false Fusion, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 2821-2825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, C., 1969: Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division, J. Physiol. 205, 471-497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasdel, G.,Mitchell, D.E.,Muir, D.W. andPettigrew, J.D., 1977: A physiological and behavioural study in cats of the effect of early visual experience with contours of a single orientation, J. Physiol. 265, 615-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneh, Y. andSagi, D., 1999: Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry, Vision Res. 39, 271-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottini, G.,Sterzi, R.,Paulesu, E.,Vallar, G.,Cappa, S. F. andErminio, F., 1994: Identification of the central vestibular projections in man: a positron emission tomography activation study, Exp. Brain Res. 99, 164-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese, B.B., 1899: On inhibition, Physiol. Monogr. 3, 1-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F.W.,Gilinsky, A.S.,Howell, E.R.,Riggs, L.A. andAtkinson, J., 1973: The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation, Perception 2: 123-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, T.A. andHe, S., 2000: Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry, Curr Biol. 10, 1055-1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.M.,Xu, J.D.,Radkov, E., et al., 2000: Syntheses and relaxation properties of mixed gadolinium hydroxypyridinonate MRI contrast agents, Inorg. Chem 39, 5747-5756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. andKoch, C., 1995: Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 375, 121-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A., 2000: The Feeling of What Happens. Harcourt, NY.

  • Diaz-Caneja, E, 1928: Sur líalternance binoculaire, Annales D'Oculistique 165, 721-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A.K.,Roelfsema, P.R.,Fries, P.,Brecht, M. andSinger, W., 1997: Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding, Cereb Cortex 7, 571-582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, C.G.,Rodman, H.R.,Gochin, P.M. andColombo, M.W., 1993: Inferior temporal cortex as a pattern recognition device, in E. Baum (ed.), Computational Learning and Cognition: Proceedings of the 3rd NEC Research Symposium.

  • Harrad, R.A.,McKee, S.P.,Blake, R. andYang, Y., 1994: Binocular rivalry disrupts stereopsis, Perception 23, 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, N.S.,Partridge, J.C. andCuthill, I.C., 2000: Retinal asymmetry in birds, Curr. Biol. 10, 115-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, I.P., 1995: Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity, Perception 24, 67-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G. Keith andGoodale, Melvyn A., 1998: Probing unconscious visual processing with the McCollough effect, Consciousness and Cognition 7, 494-519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. andGuilford, J.P., 1933: Fluctuation of an ambiguous figure in dementia praecox and in manic-depressive patients, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 27, 443-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, I.,Papathomas, T.V.,Yang, M. andFeher, A, 1996: When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular Rivalry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15508-15511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y.Y. andSiegel, J.M., 1988: Medullary regions mediating atonia, J. Neurosci 8, 4790-4796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, C.R. andChow, C.C., 2001: A spiking neuron model of binocular rivalry, J. Comput. Neurosci. (submitted).

  • Lee, S.H. andBlake, R., 1999: Rival ideas about binocular rivalry, Vision Res. 39, 1447-1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D.A. andLogothetis, N.K., 1996: Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkey's percepts during binocular rivalry, Nature 379, 549-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D.A. andLogothetis, N.K., 1999: Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 254-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L.,Tyler, C.W. andSchor, C.M., 1992: Failure of rivalry at low contrast: evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process, Vision Res. 32, 1471-1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, M., 2001: A spatial frequency interpretation of Mona Lisa, Science.

  • Logothetis, N.K., 1998: Single units and conscious vision, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1801-1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logothetis, N.K.,Leopold, D.A. andSheinberg, D.L., 1996: What is rivaling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotto, R.B.,Williams, S.M. andPurves, D., 1999: An empirical basis for Mach bands, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5239-5244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S.J.,Hillyard, S.A.,Mangun, G.R. andGazzaniga, M.S., 1989: Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients, Nature 342, 543-545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumer, E.D.,Friston, K.J. andRees, G., 1998: Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain, Science 280, 1930-1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, D.M. andMackay, V., 1982: Explicit dialogue between left and right half systems of split brains, Nature 295, 690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marder, E. andCalabrese, R.L., 1996: Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation, Physiol. Rev. 76, 687-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.M.,Liu, G.B.,Ngo, T.T.,Hooper, G.,Riek, S.,Carson, R.G. andPettigrew, J.D., 2000: Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry, Curr. Biol. 10, 383-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.M.,Mitchell, P.B.,Ngo, T.,Gynther, BM,Hyslop, K.,Petigrew J.D. andGeffen L., 2001 (submitted): Slow binocular rivalry in bipolar disorder.

  • Munk, M.H.J.,Roelfsema, P.R.,Konig, P.,Engel, A.K. andSinger, W., 1996: Role of reticular activation in the modulation of intracortical synchronization, Science 272, 271-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, T.T.,Miller, S.M.,Liu, G.B. andPettigrew, J.D., 2000: Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence. Curr. Biol. 10, R134-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfionovitch, Y.,Meyer, F. andDorje, G., 1992: Tibetan Medical Paintings, Illustrations by Sangye Gyamtso. Serindia Pub. Harry N. Abrams Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, J.D. andMiller, S.M., 1998: A “sticky” interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2141-2148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, J.D.,Collin, S.P. andOtt, M., 1999: Convergence of highly-specialized behavior, eye movements and visual optics in the sandlance (Teleostei) and the chameleon (Reptilia), Curr Biol 9, 421-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, O.T., 1979: Afferent projections to the ventral tegmental area of Tsai and interfascicular nucleus: a horseradish peroxidase study in the rat, J. Comp. Neurol. 187, 117-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeppel, E.,Brinkmann, R.,von Cranow, D. andSinger, W., 1978: Association and dissociation of visual functions in a case of bilateral occipital lobe infarction, Arch. Psyciat. Nervenk. 225, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, A.,Blake, R.,Braun, J. andHeeger, D.J., 2000: Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry, Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1153-1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, D.,Shimpi, A. andLotto, R.B., 1999: An empirical explanation of the Cornsweet effect, J. Neurosci. 19, 8542-8551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S., 1994: Phantom limbs, neglect dyndromes, repressed memories, and Freudian psychology, Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 37, 291-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S.,Cobb, S. andLevi, L., 1994: The neural locus of binocular rivalry and monocular diplopia in intermittent exotropes, Neuroreport May 9; 5(9), 1141-1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowat, P.F. andSelverston, A.I., 1997: Oscillatory mechanisms in pairs of neurons connected with fast inhibitory synapses, J. Comp. Neurosci. 4, 103-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., 1935: Religion and Science. The Home University of Modern Knowledge. Thornton Butterworth Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R., 2000: Consciousness, Annu Rev Neurosci. 23, 557-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengpiel, F., 2000: Binocular rivalry: Ambiguities resolved, Curr. Biol. 7, R447-R450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengpiel, F.,Blakemore, C. andHarrad, R., 1995: Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry, Vision Res. 35, 179-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannahoff-Khalsa, D, 1993: The Ultradian rhythm of alternating cerebral hemispheric activity, Int. J. Neurosci. 70, 285-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheinberg, D.L. andLogothetis, N.K., 1997: The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 3408-3413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R.,Russel, D.P.,Edelman, G.M. andTononi, G., 1999: Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception, J. Neurosci. 19, 5435-5448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., 1966: The nasotemporal division of the cat's retina, J. Comp. Neurol. 126, 585-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J.,Leicester, J. andSherman, S.M., 1973: The nasotemporal division of the monkey's retina, J. Comp. Neurol. 150, 333-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, R.A., 1997: Peripheral control and lateralization of birdsong, J. Neurobiol. 33, 632-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F.,Nakayama, K.,Vaughan, J.T. andKanwisher, N., 1998: Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex, Neuron. 21, 753-759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallar, G.,Bottini, G.,Rusconi, M.L. andSterzi, R., 1993: Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation, Brain 116, 71-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitte, E.,Derosier, C.,Caritu, Y.,Berthoz, A.,Hasboun, D. andSoulie, D., 1996: Activation of the hippocampal formation by vestibular stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, Exp. Brain Res. 112, 523-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N.J., 1998: Early studies of eye dominances, Laterality 3, 97-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N.J. andWenderoth, P., 1978: The influence of color and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect, Vision Res. 18, 827-836.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Zwan, R. andWenderoth, P., 1994: Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry, Vis Neurosci. 11, 823-830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidyasagar, T.R., 1998: Gating of neuronal responses in macaque primary visual cortex by an attentional spotlight, Neuroreport 9, 1947-1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P., 1975: Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations, Percept Psychophys 18, 467-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J.M.,Alvarez, G.A. andHorowitz, T.S., 2000: Attention is fast but volition is slow, Nature 406, 691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidel, E.,Clarke, J.M. andSuyenobu, B., 1990: Hemispheric independence: a paradigm case for cognitive neuroscience, in A.B. Scheibel andA. Wechsler (eds), A Neurobiology of Higher Cognitive Function, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 297-355.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vision, Touch and Hearing Research Centre, University of Queensland, 4072, Australia

    John D. Pettigrew

Authors
  1. John D. Pettigrew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettigrew, J.D. Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations. Brain and Mind 2, 85–118 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017929617197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017929617197

Search

Navigation