Skip to main content
Log in

A Constant Erosion Rate Model for Fine Sediment in the York River, Virginia

  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results of field experiments using the Virginia Institute of Marine Science' Sea Carousel and tripod system reveal a highly dynamic sediment activity at the Clay Bank site in the York River. At the water-sediment interface, the critical bed shear stress for sediment erosion varied between 0.026 Pa and 0.1 Pa. For the well consolidated sediment below the interface, the critical bed shear stress increased significantly, to more than 0.6 Pa. The seasonal variation of erosion rate for the surficial sediment is significant. For the well consolidated sediment below the surficial sediment, however, the seasonal variation diminished and erosion rate approached a constant. Experimental results from the Carousel deployments imply that the erosion process for quasi-steady tidal flows is always near equilibrium. For this reason, a constant rate erosion model is proposed for the time during tidal acceleration phases. For other times, the erosion rate would be zero. The measured suspended sediment concentration at 10 cm above bed from the VIMS tripod system also Supports this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amos, C.L., Darborn, G.R., Christian, H.A., Atkinson, A. and Robertson, A.: 1992, In-situ erosion measurements on fine grained sediments from the Bay of Fundy, Mar. Geol. 108, 175-196.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dade, W.B., Nowell, A.R.M. and Jumar, P.A.: 1992, Predicting erosion resistance of mud, Mar. Geol. 105, 285-297.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fukuda, M.K. and Lick, W.: 1980, The entrainment of cohesive sediments in freshwater, J. Geophys. Res. 85, 2813-2824.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grant, J. and Gust, G.: 1987, Prediction of coastal sediment stability from photopigment content of mats of purple sulfur bacteria, Nature 330, 244-246.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gularte, R.C., Kelly, E.W. and Nacci, V.A.: 1980, Erosion of cohesive sediments as a rate process, Ocean Eng. 7, 539-551.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parchure, T.M. and Mehta, A.J.: 1985, Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits, J. Hydraulic Eng. ASCE 111, 1308-1326.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Risk, M.J., 1980. General intertidal biological processes. In: S.B. McCann (ed.), Sedimentary Processes and Animal-Sediment Relationships in Tidal Environments, G.A.C. Short Course, Vol. 1, pp. 59-94.

  8. Maa, J.P.-Y. and Lee, C.-H.: 1997, Variation of the resuspension coefficients in the lower cheasapeake Bay, J. Coastal Res. 25, 63-74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maa, J.P.-Y., Wright, L.D., Lee, C.-H. and Shannon, T.W.: 1993, VIMS Sea Carousal: A field instrument for studying sediment transport, Mar. Geol. 115, 271-287.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maa, J.P.-Y., Sanford, L. and Halka, J.P.: 1998, Sediment resuspension characteristics in the Baltimore Harbor, Mar. Geol. 146, 137-145.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Owen, M.W.: 1971, The effects of turbulence on floc settling velocities, Proc. 14th Congr. Inst. Assoc. Hydraul. Res., Paper D4, Paris, 1971.

  12. Dellapenna, T.M., Kuehl, S.A. and Schaffner, LC.: 1998, Sea-bed mixing and particle residence times in biologically dominated estuarine systems: a comparison of lower Chesapeake Bay and the York River subestuary, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 46, 777-795.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dellapenna, T.M., Kuehl, S.A. and Pitts, L.: 2001, Transient, longitudinal, erosional furrows in the York River subestuary, Chesapeake Bay: Furrow evolution and effects on seabed mixing and sediment transport, Estuaries 24, 215-227.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kniskern, T.A.: 2001, Spatial and temporal variability of physical and biological mixing in the York River subestuary, M.S. Thesis, School of Marine Science/Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, 112 pp.

  15. Lin, J.: 2001, A study of the secondary turbidity maximum in the York River estuary, Virginia, Ph. D. Dissertation, School of Marine Science/Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, 181 pp.

  16. Maa, J. P.-Y.: 1993, VIMS Sea Carousel: Its hydrodynamic characteristics. In: A.J. Mehta (ed.), Nearshore and Estuarine Cohesive Sediment Transport, Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Vol. 42, pp. 265-280, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maa, J. P.-Y., Lee, C.-H. and Chen, F.J.: 1995, VIMS Sea Carousel: Bed shear stress measurements, Mar. Geol. 129, 129-136.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, L.D., Schaffner, L.C. and Maa, J.P.-Y.: 1997, Biological mediation of bottom boundary layer processes and sediment suspension in the lower Chesapeake Bay, Mar. Geol. 141, 27-50.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wright, L.D., Kim, S.-C. and Friedrichs, C.T.: 1999, Across-shelf variations in bed roughness, bed stress and sediment suspension on the Northern California shelf, Mar. Geol. 154, 99-115.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hayter, E.J.: 1986, Estuarial sediment bed model. In: A.J. Mehta (ed.), Estuarine Cohesive Sediment Dynamics, Lecture Note on Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Chapter XVI, Vol. 14, pp. 215-232, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maa, J.PY., Kim, SC. A Constant Erosion Rate Model for Fine Sediment in the York River, Virginia. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 1, 345–360 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015799926777

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015799926777

Navigation