Abstract
A supertask is a process in which an infinite number of individuated actions are performed in a finite time. A Newtonian supertask is one that obeys Newton's laws of motion. Such supertasks can violate energy and momentum conservation and can exhibit indeterministic behavior. Perez Laraudogoitia, who proposed several Newtonian supertasks, uses a local, i.e., particle-by-particle, analysis to obtain these and other paradoxical properties of Newtonian supertasks. Alper and Bridger use a global analysis, embedding the system of particles in a Banach space, to determine the origin of the strange behavior. This paper provides a common framework for the discussion of both the local and global methods of analysis. Using this single framework, the areas of disagreement and agreement are made explicit. Further examples of supertasks are proposed to illuminate various aspects of the discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alper, J. S. and M. Bridger: 1998, ‘Newtonian Supertasks: A Critical Analysis', Synthese 114, 355–369.
Alper, J. S. and M. Bridger: 1999, ‘On the Dynamics of Pérez Laraudogoitia's Supertask', Synthese 119, 325–337.
Alper, J. S., M. Bridger, J. Earman, and Norton J.: 2000, ‘What is a Newtonian System? The Failure of Energy Conservation and Determinism in Supertasks', Synthese 124, 281–293.
Benacerraf, P.: 1970, ‘Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics', in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 103–129.
Grünbaum, A.: 1970, ‘Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion', in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 200–250.
Messiah, A.: 1999, Quantum Mechanics, Dover, Mineola, N.Y., pp. 179–184.
Norton, J.: 1999, ‘A Quantum Mechanical Supertask', Foundations of Physics 29, 1265–1302.
Pérez Laraudogoitia, J.: 1996, ‘A Beautiful Supertask', Mind 105, 81–83.
Pérez Laraudogoitia, J.: 1998, ‘Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo', Synthese 115, 259–265.
Pérez Larandogoitia, J.: 1999, ‘Why Dynamical Self-Excitation is Possible', Synthese 119, 313–323.
Pérez Lanaudogoitia, J.: 2002, ‘On the Dynamics of Alper and Bridger', Synthese 131, 157–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez Laaraudogoitia, J., Bridger, M. & Alper, J.S. Two Ways Of Looking At A Newtonian Supertask. Synthese 131, 173–189 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015775628393
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015775628393