Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a Formal Philosophy of Hypercomputation

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Does what guides a pastry chef stand on par, from the standpoint of contemporary computer science, with what guides a supercomputer? Did Betty Crocker, when telling us how to bake a cake, provide an effective procedure, in the sense of `effective' used in computer science? According to Cleland, the answer in both cases is ``Yes''. One consequence of Cleland's affirmative answer is supposed to be that hypercomputation is, to use her phrase, ``theoretically viable''. Unfortunately, though we applaud Cleland's ``gadfly philosophizing'' (as, in fact, seminal), we believe that unless such a modus operandi is married to formal philosophy, nothing conclusive will be produced (as evidenced by the problems plaguing Cleland's work that we uncover). Herein, we attempt to pull off not the complete marriage for hypercomputation, but perhaps at least the beginning of a courtship that others can subsequently help along.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boolos, G.S. and Jeffrey, R. C. (1989), Computability and Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. (1992), What Robots Can and Can't Be, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. (1994), 'Computation, Among Other Things, Is Beneath Us', Minds and Machines 4, pp. 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. (1998), 'Philosophy and 'super' Computation', in J. Moor and T. Bynam, eds., The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosopy, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. (2001), 'In Computation, Parallel Is Nothing, Physical Everything', Minds and Machines 11, pp. 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. and Ferrucci, D. (2000), Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity: Inside the Mind of Brutus, a Storytelling Machine, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (1999), Quantum Computing and Communications, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (1995), 'Effective procedures and computable functions', Minds and Machines 5, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (2000), 'Effective Procedures and Casual Processes', Hypercomputation Workshop, London, England, May 24, 2000.

  • Cleland, C (2001), 'Recipes, Algorithms, and Programs', Minds and Machines 11, pp. 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. J. (1998), 'Even Turing Machines Can Compute Uncomputable Functions', in J. Casti, ed., Unconventional Models of Computation, London: Springer, pp. 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., Sigal, R. and Weyuker, E. (1994), Computability, Complexity, and Languages: Fundamentals of Theoretical Computer Science, New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1985), 'Quantum Theory, The Church-Turing Principle, and The Universal Quantum Computer', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 400, pp. 87–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. D., Flum, J. and Thomas, W. (1984), Mathematical Logic, NewYork, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicholz, R. E., O'Daffer, P. G., Charles, R. I., Young, S. I., Barnett, C. S., Clemens, S. R., Gilmer, G. F., Reeves, A., Renfro, F. L., Thompson, M. M. and Thorntoon, C. A. (1995), Ýit Grade 7 Addison-Wesley Mathematics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltovich, P., Ford, K and Hayes, P., eds (1983), Proceedings of a Conference on Physics and Computation, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(3/4), 21(6/7), 21(12).

  • Feynman, R. (1986), 'Quantum Mechanical Computers', Foundations of Physics 16, pp. 507–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P. (1982), 'Simulating Physics With Computers', International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, pp. 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. (1983), 'How Random Is a Coin Toss?', Physics Today, pp. 40–47.

  • Fredkin, E. (1990), 'Digital Mechanics', Physica D 45, pp. 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. (1965), 'Limiting Recursion', Journal of Symbolic Logic 33(1), pp. 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, D. (1994), Philosophy of Mind, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugel, P. (1986), 'Thinking May Be More Than Computing', Cognition 18, pp. 128–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. and Papadimitriou, C. (1981), Elements of the Theory of Computatution, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pour-El, M. and Richards, I. (1981a), 'A Computable Ordinary Differential Equation Which Possesses No Computable Solution', Annals of Mathematical Logic 17, pp. 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pour-El, M. and Richards, I. (1981b), 'The Wave Equation Computable Initial Data Such That Its Unique Solution Is Not Computable', Advances in Mathematics 39, pp. 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1965), 'Trial and Error Predicates and a Solution To a Problem of Mostowski', Journal of Symbolic Logic 30(1), pp. 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1936), 'The Limits of Empiricism', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 36, pp. 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C. (1975), Space, Time and Motion: A Philosophical Introduction, Encino, CA: Dickenson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, E. (2001), 'Constructivism Is Difficult', Ýit the Mathematical Association of America Monthly 108, pp. 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1992), The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelmann, H. (1995), 'Computation Beyond the Turning Limit', Science 268, pp. 545–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelmann, H and Sontag, E. (1994), 'Analog Computation Via Neural Nets', Theoretical Computer Science 131, pp. 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P. (1989), Relativity, Relation Holism, and The Bell Inequalities, in J. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds., 'Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory', Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1938), Dissertation for the PhD: 'systems of Logic Based on Ordinals', Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1939), 'Systems of Logic Based on Ordinals', Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (Series 2) 45, pp. 161–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1949), Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bringsjord, S., Zenzen, M. Toward a Formal Philosophy of Hypercomputation. Minds and Machines 12, 241–258 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015651216328

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015651216328

Navigation