Skip to main content
Log in

On Effective Procedures

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the mid-twentieth century, the concept of the Turing machine has dominated thought about effective procedures. This paper presents an alternative to Turing's analysis; it unifies, refines, and extends my earlier work on this topic. I show that Turing machines cannot live up to their billing as paragons of effective procedure; at best, they may be said to provide us with mere procedure schemas. I argue that the concept of an effective procedure crucially depends upon distinguishing procedures as definite courses of action(- types) from the particular courses of action(-tokens) that actually instantiate them and the causal processes and/or interpretations that ultimately make them effective. On my analysis, effectiveness is not just a matter of logical form; `content' matters. The analysis I provide has the advantage of applying to ordinary, everyday procedures such as recipes and methods, as well as the more refined procedures of mathematics and computer science. It also has the virtue of making better sense of the physical possibilities for hypercomputation than the received view and its extensions, e.g. Turing's o-machines, accelerating machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gandy, R. (1988), 'The confluence of Ideas in 1936', in R. Herkin, ed., The Universal Turing Machine: A Half-Century Survey, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, R. (1980), 'Church's thesis and principles for mechanisms', in J. Barwise, J.J. Keisler and K. Kunen, eds., The Kleene Symposium, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 227–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1965), 'Remarks Before the Princeton Bicentennial Conference on Problems in Mathematics', in M. Davis, ed., The Undecidable, New York: Raven Press, pp. 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D.M. (1998), Causal Asymmetries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. and Dennett, D. (1981), The Mind's Eye, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. (1988), 'Turing's Analysis of Computability, and Major Applications of It', in R. Herkin, ed., The Universal Turing Machine: A Half Century Survey, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1967), Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2000), Causality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J.B. (1939), 'An Informal Exposition of Proofs of Godel's theorem and Church's Theorem', in M. Davis, ed., The Undecidable, New York: Raven Press, pp. 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1965a), 'Systems of Logic Based on Ordinals', in M. Davis, ed., The Undecidable, New York: Raven Press, pp. 155–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1965b), 'On computable Numbers with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem', in M. Davis, ed., The Undecidable, New York: Raven Press, pp. 116–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1992), The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (1974), From Mathematics to Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cleland, C.E. On Effective Procedures. Minds and Machines 12, 159–179 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015606528623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015606528623

Navigation