Skip to main content
Log in

Are Government Employees more Likely to Vote?: An Analysis of Turnout in the 1996 U.S. National Election

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we develop and test a model of voter turnoutthat permits us to differentiate turnout rates for governmentemployees and other citizens, controlling for the effects of awide range of other variables relating to turnout. Using 1996ANES data, we find that there is a significant difference inturnout rates for bureaucrats and nonbureaucrats, both insimple bivariate analyses and in a full multivariate model.The magnitude and significance of the coefficient forgovernment employment, even in the face of controls, suggeststhere is something about government employment per sethat has an effect on turnout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, J. (1995). Why parties?: The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.T. and Orzechowski, W.O. (1983). The voting behavior of bureaucrats: Some empirical evidence. Public Choice 41: 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, W. and Garand, J. (1995). Are bureaucrats different?: Democratic values, political tolerance, and support for the political system among government employees and other citizens, 1982-1992. Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Blair, W. and Garand, J.C. (1997). Bureaucratic constituency influence on congressional roll-call behavior: The influence of government employees on congressional support for spending. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

  • Blais, A. and Dion, S. (Eds.). (1991). The budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Blake, D.E. and Dion, S. (1990). The public/private sector cleavage in North America. Comparative Political Studies 23: 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Blake, D.E. and Dion, S. (1997). Government, parties, and public sector employees. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D.E. (1991). Policy attitudes and political ideology. In A. Blais and S. Dion (Eds.), The budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T.E., Bush, W.C. and Spann, R.M. (1977). The effects on public spending of the divisibility of public outputs in consumption, bureaucratic power, and the size of the tax-sharing group. In T.E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. and Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41: 999–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden, B. (1999). Measuring voter turnout in the national election studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Bush, W.C. and Denzau, A.T. (1977). The voting behavior of bureaucrats and public sector growth. In T.E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1982). How powerful are public bureaucrats as voters? Public Choice 38: 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garand, J., Parkhurst, C. and Seoud, R. (1991). Bureaucrats, policy attitudes, and political behavior: Extension of the bureau voting model of government growth. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1: 177–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E.M. and Rubinfeld, D.C. (1982). Voting on public spending: Differences between public employees, transfer recipients, and private workers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1: 516–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. (1994). Public attitudes toward government spending. American Journal of Political Science 38: 336–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. (1990). In search of the Machiavellian milquetoasts: Comparing attitudes of bureaucrats and ordinary people. Public Administration Review 50: 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen,W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1991). A reflection on bureaucracy and representative government. In A. Blais and S. Dion (Eds.), Budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, S. and Hansen, J.M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, P., Wolfinger, R. and Glass, D. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review 81: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpone, R.J. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review 92: 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.D. (1988). Principals, bureaucrats, and responsiveness in Clean Air Enforcements. American Political Science Review 82: 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.D. and Waterman, R.W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 85: 801–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. and Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corey, E.C., Garand, J.C. Are Government Employees more Likely to Vote?: An Analysis of Turnout in the 1996 U.S. National Election. Public Choice 111, 259–283 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015290806607

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015290806607

Keywords

Navigation