Skip to main content
Log in

The Reduction of Causal Processes

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The principle that causes always render their effects more likely is fundamental to the enterprise of reducing facts of causation to facts about (objective) chances. This reductionist enterprise faces famous difficulties in accommodating common-sense intuitions about causal processes, if it insists on cashing out causal processes in terms of streams of events in which every event that belongs to the stream is a cause of the adjoining event downstream of it. I shall propose modifications to this way of cashing out causal processes, still well within the reductionist faith. These modifications will allow the reductionist to handle processes successfully, on the assumption that the reductionist proposal is itself otherwise satisfactory. I shall then argue that the reductionist enterprise lies squarely behind the Theory of Relativity, and so has all the confirmatory weight of Relativity behind it. However this is not all good news for reductionists. For throughout I shall simply assume that the reductionist proposal, to the effect that causes are just chance-raisers, is correct. AndI shall sidestep problems with that proposal as such. And so I shall show that, if in the end we find the reductionist proposal unsatisfactory, it cannot be on grounds of its treatment of causal processes as such. Thus, while I shall argue that causal processes pose no extra trouble for redutionists, I shall be making a case that all the action between reductionists and their opponents should be focused upon the proposal to reduce the two-term causal relation itself to relations amongst probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aronson, J.: 1971, ‘On the Grammar of “Cause”', Synthese 22, 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘A Space-time Approach to the Bell Inequality', in Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, Notre Dame University Press, pp. 114–144.

  • Cartwright, N.: 1989, Nature's Capacities and their Measurement, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowe, P.: 1992, ‘Wesley Salmon's Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory', Philosophy of Science 59, 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowe, P.: 1993 ‘On the Reduction of Process Causality to Statistical Relevance', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, 325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowe, P.: 1995, ‘What's Right and What's Wrong with Transference Theories', Erkenntnis 42, 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, E. and E. Sober: 1983, ‘Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity', Philosophy of Science 50, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair, D.: 1967, ‘Causation and the Flow of Energy', Erkenntnis 14, 219–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D. and J. Pearl: 1988, ‘Logical and Algorthmic Properties of Conditional Independence', Technical report, Cognitive Systems Laboratory, UCLA.

  • Geroch, R.: 1978, Relativity from A to B, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: 1961, A Causal Calculus, i–ii.

  • Irzik, G.: 1996, ‘Can Causes be Reduced to Correlations', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World', in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1988, ‘On Raising the Chances of Effects', in J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Probability and Causality, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 229–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C., Spirtes, P. and Scheines, R.: 1992, Causation, Prediction and Search, Springer-Verlag.

  • Papineau, D.: 1989, ‘Pure, Mixed and Spurious Probabilities and Their Significance for a Reductionist Theory of Causation', in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 347–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D.: 1993, ‘Can We Reduce Causal Direction to Probabilities?', Proceedings of the 1992 Bienniel Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J.: 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. and Paz, A.: 1985, ‘Graphoids: A Graph-based Logic for Reasoning About Relevance Relations', in D. Hogg B. DuBoulay and L. Steels (eds), Advances in Artificial Intelligence 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1956, The Direction of Time, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1958, The Philosophy of Space and Time, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1948 Human Knowledge, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C.: 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1988, ‘The Principle of the Common Cause', in J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Probability and Causality, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1970 A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thalos, M. The Reduction of Causal Processes. Synthese 131, 99–128 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015015024056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015015024056

Keywords

Navigation