Skip to main content
Log in

Operational Decisions in AGV-Served Flowshop Loops: Fleet Sizing and Decomposition

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers design and operational issues that arise in repetitive manufacturing systems served by automated guided vehicles (AGVs) in loop layouts with unidirectional material flow. Such systems are in widespread industrial use, and play an important role in modern manufacturing environments. The objective considered is the minimization of AGV fleet size, given the minimum steady state cycle time required to produce a minimal job set (or equivalently, given the maximum throughput rate). We also study whether the decomposition of a large AGV-served flowshop loop into several smaller loops improves productivity. The original loop and the decomposed design are compared with respect to the minimum cycle time needed for the repetitive manufacture of a minimal job set. When there are three or more machines in the loop, finding the optimal cycle time is an intractable problem. We therefore use the genetic algorithm developed in the companion paper [17], to identify whether the original or the decomposed design is more efficient. Our study suggests that many systems perform more productively as a result of decomposition. Finally, we discuss a joint sequencing issue that arises in decomposed systems with limited buffers between the loops, and analyze the tractability of all the relevant joint sequencing problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.R. Baker, Elements of Sequencing and Scheduling, Paperback edition (Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Blazewicz, H.A. Eiselt, G. Finke, G. Laporte and J. Weglarz, Scheduling tasks and vehicles in a flexible manufacturing system, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 4 (1991) 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Blazewicz, R.E. Burkard, G. Finke and G.J. Woeginger, Vehicle scheduling in two-cycle flexible manufacturing systems, Mathematical and Computer Modeling 20 (1994) 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y.A. Bozer and M.M. Srinivasan, Tandem configurations for AGV systems offer simplicity and flexibility, Industrial Engineering 21 (1989) 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y.A. Bozer and M.M. Srinivasan, Tandem configurations for automated guided vehicle systems and the analysis of single vehicle loops, IIE Transactions 23 (1991) 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y.A. Bozer and M.M. Srinivasan, Tandem AGV systems: A partitioning algorithm and performance comparison with conventional AGV systems, European Journal of Operational Research 63 (1992) 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.-G. Choi, H.-J. Kwon and J. Lee, Traditional and tandem AGV system layouts: A simulation study, Simulation 63 (1994) 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Ganesharajah, N.G. Hall and C. Sriskandarajah, Design and operational issues in AGV-served manufacturing systems, Annals of Operations Research 76 (1998) 109–154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (Freeman, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.C. Gilmore and R.E. Gomory, Sequencing a one state-variable machine: a solvable case of the traveling salesman problem, Operations Research 12 (1964) 665–679.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Gould, AGVS improves ergonomics, flexibility, Modern Materials Handling 45 (1990) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.L. Graham, E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey, Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5 (1979) 287–326.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Grasso, AGV-served assembly lines: Influence of sequencing and launch policies on system performances, International Journal of Production Research 28 (1990) 1385–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Grosseschallau and A. Kusiak, An expert system for design of automated material handling systems (INSIMAS), Material Flow 2 (1985) 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N.G. Hall, H. Kamoun and C. Sriskandarajah, Scheduling in robotic cells: classification, two and three machine cells, Operations Research 45 (1997) 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N.G. Hall, H. Kamoun and C. Sriskandarajah, Scheduling in robotic cells: complexity and steady-state analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 109 (1998) 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N.G. Hall, C. Sriskandarajah and T. Ganesharajah, Operational decisions in AGV-served flowshop loops: scheduling, Annals of Operations Research 107 (2001) 161–188.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.W. Hall, Cyclic scheduling for improvement, International Journal of Production Research 26 (1988) 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.E. Johnson and M.L. Brandeau, Designing multiple-load automated guided vehicle systems for delivering material from a central depot, Journal of Engineering for Industry 117 (1995) 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Kamoun, N.G. Hall and C. Sriskandarajah, Scheduling in robotic cells: heuristics and cell design, Operations Research 47 (1999) 821–835.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Kise, T. Shioyama and T. Ibaraki, Automated two-machine flowshop scheduling: a solvable case, IIE Transactions 23 (1991) 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Kouvelis and M.W. Kim, Unidirectional loop network layout problem in automated manufacturing systems, Operations Research 40 (1992) 533–550.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Kusiak, Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Kusiak and W. He, Design of components for schedulability, European Journal of Operational Research 76 (1994) 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L.C. Leung, S.K. Khator and D.L. Kimbler, Assignment of AGVS with different vehicle types, Material Flow 4 (1987) 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.T. Lin, C.C.K. Chang and W.-C. Liu, A load-routing problem in a tandem-configuration automated guided-vehicle system, International Journal of Production Research 32 (1994) 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.T. Lin and P.-K. Dgen, An algorithm for routing control of a tandem automated guided vehicle system, International Journal of Production Research 32 (1994) 2735–2750.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W.L. Maxwell and J.A. Muckstadt, Design of automated guided vehicle systems, IIE Transactions 14 (1982) 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Monden, Toyota Production System (Institute of Industrial Engineers Press, Norcross, GA, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Ozden, A simulation study of multiple-load-carrying automated guided vehicles in a flexible manufacturing system, International Journal of Production Research 26 (1988) 1353–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Panwalkar, Scheduling of a two-machine flowshop with travel time between machines, Journal of the Operational Research Society 42 (1991) 609–613.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.L. Pinedo, Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewod Cliffs, NJ, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. H.I. Stern and G. Vitner, Scheduling parts in a combined production-transportation work cell, Journal of the Operational Research Society 41 (1990) 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Wang and S.A. Hafeez, Performance evaluation of tandem and conventional AGV systems using generalized stochastic Petri-nets, International Journal of Production Research 32 (1994) 917–932.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R.J. Wittrock, Scheduling algorithms for flexible flow lines, IBM Journal of Research and Development 29 (1985) 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Zygmont, Guided vehicles set manufacturing in motion, High Technology 16 (December 1986).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, N.G., Sriskandarajah, C. & Ganesharajah, T. Operational Decisions in AGV-Served Flowshop Loops: Fleet Sizing and Decomposition. Annals of Operations Research 107, 189–209 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014955216633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014955216633

Navigation