Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives as Change Agents

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the relationships between discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling, arguing that many of the factors that preclude women from occupying executive and managerial positions also foster sexual harassment. We suggest that measures designed to increase numbers of women in higher level positions will reduce sexual harassment. We first define and discuss discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling, relationships between each, and relevant legislation. We next discuss the relationships between gender and sexual harassment, emphasizing the influence of gender inequality on sexual harassment. We then present recommendations for organizations seeking to reduce sexual harassment, emphasizing the role that women executives may play in such efforts and, importantly, the recursive effects of such efforts on increasing the numbers of women in higher level positions in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, E.: 1996, ‘Management Fashion’, Academy of Management Review 21, 254–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antal, A. and D. Izraeli: 1993, ‘A Global Comparison of Women in Management: Women Managers in their Homelands and as Expatriates', in E. Fagenson (ed.), Women in Management (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA), pp. 52–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A.: 1997, ‘Cross-cultural Perspectives on Sexual Harassment', in W. O'Donohue (ed.), Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA), pp. 263–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugh, S. G.: 1997, ‘On the Persistence of Sexual Harassment’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, K.: 1984, ‘Comment on Crocker's "An Analysis of University Definitions of Sexual Harassment"’, Signs 9, 516–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, G. L., E. H. Blakely and R. H. Moorman: 1995, ‘The Relationship between Gender, Personal Experience, and Perceptions of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 8, 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F., M. Ferber and A. E. Winkler: 1998, The Economics of Women, Men, and Work, 3rd edition (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, C. E. and R. B. Whaley: 2001, ‘Sex Segregation in the U.S. Labor Force', in D. Vannoy (ed.), Gender Mosaics: Social Perspectives (Original Readings)(Roxbury Publishing, Los Angeles, CA), pp. 228–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler, P. M.: 1999, ‘The Manager's Role in Preventing Sexual Harassment’, Supervision 60(4), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda, D.: 1996, ‘ACHE Survey Response Spurs Expedited Sexual Harassment Policy’, Modern Healthcare 26(42), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D. and E. Borgida: 1997, Sexual Harassment: An Experimental Test of Sex-role Spillover Theory’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. and C. A. McKeen: 1992, ‘Social-sexual Behaviors at Work: Experiences of Managerial and Professional Women’, Women in Management Review 7(3), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. and C. A. McKeen: 1996, ‘Do Women at the Top Make a Difference? Gender Proportions and the Experiences of Managerial and Professional Women’, Human Relations 49, 1093–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G.: 1986, ‘The Economic Analysis of Labor Market Discrimination: A Survey', in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Elsevier Science Publishers, B. V., Amsterdam), pp. 693–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Can, T.: 1995, ‘The Existence of Sexual Harassment in China’, Chinese Education and Society 28, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, K. W., R. L. Miller, G. A. Jentz and F. B. Cross: 1995, West's Business Law: Text, Cases, Legal, Regulatory, and International Environment (6th ed.) (West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, A.: 1997, ‘Legal Theories of Sexual Harassment', in W. O'Donohue (ed.), Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA), pp. 50–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corne v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 390 F. Supp. 161 (D. Arz. 1975), vacated, 562 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1977).

  • Dekker, I. and J. Barling: 1998, ‘Personal and Organizational Predictors of Workplace Sexual Harassment of Women by Men’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 31, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L.: 1985, ‘Some Neglected Variables in Research on Discrimination in Appraisals’, Academy of Management Review 10, 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: 1980, ‘Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex’, Federal Register 45, 74676–74677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: 2000, 'Sexual harassment charges EEOC & FEPAs Combined: FY 1992-FY 2000', [On-line]. Available: http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/harass.html.

  • Fain, T. C. and D. L. Anderton: 1987, ‘Sexual Harassment: Organizational Context and Diffuse Status’, Sex Roles 5(6), 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. A. and J. J. Jackson: 1993, ‘The Status of Women Managers in the United States’, International Studies of Management and Organizations 23, 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Glass Ceiling Commission: 1997, ‘The Glass Ceiling', in D. Dunn (ed.), Workplace/Women's Place: an Anthology (Roxbury Publishing, Los Angeles, CA), pp. 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., C. L. Hulin and R. Drasgow: 1995, ‘The Antecedents and Consequences of Sexual Harassment in Organizations: An Integrated Model', in G. P. Keita and J. J. Hurrell, Jr. (eds.), Job Stress in a Changing Workforce: Investigating Gender, Diversity, and Family Issues (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), pp. 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune: July 10, 2000, 'America's 50 Best Companies for Minorities', pp. 190–200.

  • Galen, M. J., J. Weber and A. Cuneo: 1991, ‘Out of the Shadows, the Thomas Hearings Force Business to Confront an Ugly Reality’, Business Week (October 28), 30–31.

  • Gelfand, M. J., L. F. Fitzgerald and F. Drasgow: 1995, ‘The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis Across Cultures and Settings’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 47, 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E.: 1989, ‘Sexual Harassment of Women Professors by Students: Exploring the Dynamics of Power, Authority, and Gender in a University Setting’, Sex Roles 21, 789–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E.: 1997. ‘An Epidemiology of Sexual Harassment: Evidence from North America and Europe', in W. O'Donohue (ed.), Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn and Bacon, Boston), pp. 84–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E.: 1998, ‘The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment’, Gender and Society 12, 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. and L. Bjorn: 1982, ‘Blue-collar Blues: The Sexual Harassment of Women Autoworkers’, Work and Occupations 93, 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, E. O., W. O'Donohue and S. H. Peterson: 1997, ‘The Prevention of Sexual Harassment', in W. O'Donohue (ed.), Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn and Bacon: Boston), pp. 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A.: 1985, Sex and the Workplace ( Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. and M. P. Koss, 1993, ‘Changed Women and Changed Organizations: Consequences of and Coping with Sexual Harassment’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 42, 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. and B. Morasch: 1982, ‘Sex Ratios, Sex-role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work’, Journal of Social Issues 38, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgesen, S.: 1990, The Female Advantage: Women's Ways of Leading (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C. L., L. F. Fitzgerald and F. Drasgow: 1997, ‘Organizational Influences on Sexual Harassment', in M. S. Stockdale (ed.), Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, Vol. 5 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, A.: 1994, Women's Work: Degraded and Devalued (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyton, J.: 1996, ‘Sexual Harassment: A Multidisciplinary Synthesis and Critique', in B. R. Burleson (ed.), Communication Yearbook, Vol. 19 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 92–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Marlene: 2000, ‘Women Paid Low Wages: Who They Are and Where They Work’, Monthly Labor Review 123(9), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M. and A. Gutek: 1986, ‘Impact of Work Experiences on Attitudes Toward Sexual Harassment’, Adminstrative Science Quarterly 31, 422–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K.: 1992, ‘Women Hold Up Half the Sky: The Status of Managerial Women in China', in W. Wedley (ed.), Advances in Chinese Industrial Studies, Vol. 3 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K.: 1993, ‘Managerial Women in the People's Republic of China’, International Studies of Management in Organization 23(4), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D., Jr. and P. S. Greenlaw: 2000, ‘Employer Liability for Employee Sexual Harassment: A Judicial Policy-making Study’, Public Administration Review 60(2), 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maatman, G. L., Jr.: 2000, ‘Harassment, Discrimination Laws Go Global’, National Underwriter 104(37), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, M.: 1997, ‘Gender Equity, Organizational Transformation, and Challenger’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(9), 943–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, P. K., P. B. Koch, J. Henderson, J. R. Vicary, M. Cohn and E. W. Young: 1991, ‘The Job Climate for Women in Traditionally Male Bluecollar Occupations’, Sex Roles 25, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.: 1989, ‘Sexual Harassment: The Link Joining Gender Stratification, Sexuality, and Women's Economic Status', in J. Freeman (ed.), Women: A Feminist Perspective, 4th ed. (Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, CA), pp. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, K.: 1990, ‘Sexual Harassment of University Faculty by Colleagues and Students’, Sex Roles 23, 431–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, K.: 1992, ‘Contrapower Sexual Harassment: The Effects of Student Sex and Type of Behavior or Faculty Perceptions’, Sex Roles 27, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. L.: 1997, ‘Not Just Weapons of the Weak: Gender Harassment as a Form of Protest for Army Men’, Social Pscyhology Quarterly 60, 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M. and M. A. von Glinow: 1990, ‘Women and Minorities in Management’, American Psychologist 45, 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muli, K.: 1995, ‘Help Me Balance the Load': Gender Discrimination in Kenya', in J. Peters and A. Wolper (ed.), Women's Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives (Routledge, London), pp. 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, L. J., C. Hulin and F. Drasgow: 2000, ‘Longitudinal Analysis of Dispositional Influences and Sexual Harassment: Effects on Job and Psychological Outcomes’, Personnel Psychology 53, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F. and B. A. Gutek: 1981, Women and Work A Psychological Perspective (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donohue, W.: 1997, ‘Introduction', in W. O'Donohue (ed.), Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, B. and S. L. Harlan: 1982, ‘Craftworkers and Clerks: The Effects of Male Coworker Hostility on Women's Satisfaction with Nontraditional Jobs’, Social Problems 29, 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hare, E. A. and W. O'Donohue: 1998, ‘Sexual Harassment: Identifying Risk Factors’, Archives of Sexual Behavior 27, 561–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., R. L, Paetzold and R. W. Griffin: 2000, ‘Sexual Harassment as Aggressive Behavior: An Actor Based Perspective’, The Academy of Management Review 25, 372–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold, R. L. and A. M. O'Leary-Kelly: 1996, ‘The Implications of U.S. Supreme Court and Circuit Court Decisions for Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment Cases', in M. S. Stockdale (ed.) Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, Vol. 5 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrkowski, C. S.: 1998, ‘Gender Harassment, Job Satisfaction, and Distress Among Employed White and Minority Women’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 3, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., E. R. DeSouza, J. Fitness, C. Hutz, M. Kumpf, K. Lubbert, O. Pesonen and M. Erber: 1997, ‘Gender Differences in the Interpretation of Social-sexual Behavior: A Cross-cultural Perspective on Sexual Harassment’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28, 509–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B.: 1997, ‘Sex Segregation in the Workplace', in D. Dunn (ed.), Workplace/Women's Place (Roxbury Publishing, Los Angeles, CA), pp. 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, F.: 1994, ‘How to Make Diversity Pay’, Fortune, August 8.

  • Riger, S.: 1991, ‘Gender Dilemmas in Sexual Harassment Policies and Procedures’, American Psychologist 46(5), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigg, C. and J. Sparrow: 1994, ‘Gender, Diversity, and Working Styles’, Women in Management Review 9(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C., C. E. Dyer and D. Campbell: 1988, ‘Campus Harassment: Sexual Harassment Policies and Procedures at Institutions of Higher Learning’, Signs 13(4), 792–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, P. A. and M. L. Gatta: 2001, ‘The Gender Gap in Earnings', in G. Powell (ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, J. B.: 1990, ‘Ways Women Lead’, Harvard Business Review 68(6), 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoff, R.: 1992, ‘Sexual Harassment: The Inside Story (Working Woman Survey)’, Working Woman ( June), 47–78.

  • Schneider, K. T., S. Swan and L. F. Fitzgerald, 1997, ‘Job-related and Psychological Effects of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence from Two Organizations’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 401–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M. A., J. R. W. Joplin, M. P. Bell, T. Lau and C. Oguz: 2000, ‘Gender Discrimination and Jobrelated Outcomes: A Cross-cultural Comparison of Working Women in the United States and China’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 57(4), 395–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M.: 2000, Women at Work: Leadership for the Next Century (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. H., B. R. Oates and D. Flores: 1995, ‘Women's Leadership Styles: A Heuristic Analysis’, Women in Management Review 10(2), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S., M. Burt and L. Johnson: 1982, ‘Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory Models’, Journal of Social Issues 38(4), 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, R. A. and S. F. Gohmann: 1993, ‘Male/Female Differences in Perception and Effect of Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment: 'Reasonable' Assumptions?’, Public Personnel Management 22, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. A.: 1989, ‘Mentoring and Irrationality: The Role of Racial Taboos’, Human Resource Management 28, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board: 1981, Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem?(U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board: 1988, Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: An Update (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal: 1998, 'Pay Gap between Men and Women Begins to Narrow Again After a Pause', June 10, B6A.

  • Weaver, G. R., L. K. Treviño and P. L. Cochran: 1999, ‘Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices’, Academy of Management Journal 42, 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, D. L. and B. J. Kracher: 1993, ‘Justice, Sexual Harassment, and the Reasonable Victim Standard’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, S.: 1999, ‘Gender and Sexual Harassment’, Annual Review of Sociology 25, 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R. and L. Hurt: 2000, ‘How Do People Evaluate Social Sexual Conduct at Work? A Psycholegal Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology 85, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., R. Brown, P. Lees-Haley and J. Price: 1997, ‘An Attributional (Causal Dimensional) Analysis of Perceptions of Sexual Harassment’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25, 1169–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. and P. Aniakudo: 1996, ‘When Pranks become Harassment: The Case of African American Women Firefighters’, Sex Roles 35, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, M.P., Mclaughlin, M.E. & Sequeira, J.M. Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives as Change Agents. Journal of Business Ethics 37, 65–76 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014730102063

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014730102063

Navigation