Vulnerabilities for Abuse Among Women with Disabilities
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Research findings reveal that women with disabilities experience rates of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse that are comparable to, if not greater than, women without disabilities. Disability specialists propose that women with disabilities experience specific vulnerabilities to abuse. The question in the present study was, “What types of abuse experienced by women with physical disabilities are directly related to their disability?” Of the 504 women with disabilities who responded to a questionnaire assessing sexuality and relationships, 181 of the women completed open-ended questions about abuse. Using qualitative techniques, we analyzed their responses and identified disability-specific types of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. Certain disability-related settings increased vulnerability for abuse. The need for personal assistance with daily living created additional vulnerability. We conclude that disability is not a protective factor against abuse; indeed, it often serves to reduce a woman's emotional and physical defenses. These findings indicate a need for the development of disability-sensitive abuse screening instruments, and development and testing of interventions to assist women with disabilities in recognizing abuse, protecting themselves in abusive situations, and removing themselves from potentially abusive relationships and situations.
- Andrews, A.B., & Veronen, L.J. (1993). Sexual assault and people with disabilities. Special issue: Sexuality and disabilities: A guide for human service practitioners. Journal of Social Work and Human Sexuality, 8(2), 137-159.
- Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration. American Psychologist, 35(4), 320-335.
- Claussen, A.H., & Crittenden, P.M. (1991). Physical and psychological maltreatment: Relations among types of maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 5-18.
- Cole, S.S. (1984). Facing the challenges of sexual abuse in persons with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 7(3/4), 71-88.
- Danek, M.M. (1992). The status of women with disabilities revisited. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 23(4), 7-13.
- Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1996). Domestic violence: The value of services as signals. American Economic Review, 86(2), 274-279.
- Fine, M., & Asch, A. (Eds.) (1988). Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Finkelhor, D., & Korbin, J. (1988). Child abuse as an international issue. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 3-23.
- Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
- Howland, C.A., Nosek, M.A., & Young, M.E. (2001). Programs delivering abuse intervention services to women with disabilities. CROWD: Houston.
- McFarlane, J., Hughes, R.B., Nosek, M.A., Groff, J.Y., Swedlund, N., & Mullen, P.D. (2001). Abuse Assessment Screen-Disability (AAS-D): Measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine, 10(9).
- Murphy, P.A. (1993). Making the connections: Women, work, and abuse. Orlando, FL: Paul M. Deutsch Press, Inc.
- Murphy, P.A. (1992). Taking an abuse history in the initial evaluation. NARPPS, 7(5), 187-190.
- Nosek, M.A. (1995). Sexual abuse of women with physical disabilities. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, 9(2), 487-502.
- Nosek, M.A. (1996). Sexual abuse of women with physical disabilities. In D.M. Krotoski, M. A. Nosek, & M. A. Turk (Eds.), Women with physical disabilities: Achieving and maintaining health and well-being (pp. 153-173). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
- Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., & Young, M.E. (1997). Abuse of women with disabilities: Policy implications. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 8(1-2), 157-176.
- Rutgers University, Bureau of Economic Research, and The World Institute on Disability (n.d.). Towards an understanding of the demand for personal assistance. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
- Schaller, J., & Fieberg J.L. (1998). Issues of abuse for women with disabilities and implications for rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 29(2): 9-17.
- Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., & Campbell, J.C. (1997). The abuse assessment screen: A clinical instrument to measure frequency, severity and perpetrator of abuse against women. In Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., & Campbell, J.C. Beyond diagnosis: Health care advocacy for battered women and their children. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1989). Labor force status and other characteristics of persons with a work disability: 1981 to 1988 (Current Population Reports Series P-23, No. 160). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Womendez, C., & Schneiderman, K. (1991). Escaping from abuse: Unique issues for women with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 9(3), 273-280.
- Vulnerabilities for Abuse Among Women with Disabilities
Sexuality and Disability
Volume 19, Issue 3 , pp 177-189
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- domestic violence
- qualitative research