Skip to main content
Log in

“Mein Grundgedanke Ist...” The Structural Theory Of Representation As The Metaphysics Of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to propose a rational reconstruction of the theory-core ofWittgenstein's Tractatus, in order to bring into prominence its theoreticaland philosophical sources, its epistemological nature and metaphysical significance.The main idea of my approach is that when we take due account of the scientific andphilosophical context of the Tractatus, we see that its central philosophicalinnovation is a new form of metaphysics, namely a structural theory of representation.

``I am not interested in constructing a building,so much as in having a perspicuous view of the foundation of possible buildings.''

``Und nun sehen wir die gegenseitige Stellung von Logik und Mechanik.''

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bernays, P. and D. Hilbert.: 1967, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3, Mcmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltzmann, L.: 1887 (1974 in B. McGuinness (ed.), Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, R.: 1984, ‘Der Grundgedanke des Tractatus als Metamorphose des obersten Grundsatzes der Kritk der reinen Vernunft’, Kant-Studien 75, H.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.: 1964, Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harre, R.: 2000, ‘The Tractatus and the German interpretation of Physics’, forthcoming.

  • Hertz, H.: 1894 (1956), Principles of Mechanics, Trans. B. McGuinness, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and M. Hintikka: 1986, Investigating Wittgenstein, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1990, ‘Wittgenstein and the Problem of Phenomenology’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 49, 15-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janik, A.: 1994-1995, ‘How Did Hertz Influence Wittgenstein's Philosophical Development?’, in Grazer, Philosophische Studien 49, 49-61.

  • Quine, W. v. O.: 1987, Quiddities. An Intertmittently Philosophical Dictionary, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, T.: 1996, ‘Pictures, Logic and the Limits of Sense inWittgenstein's Tractatus’, in H. Sluga and D. G. Stern, 1996.

  • Sluga, H.: 1996, ‘Ludwig Wittgenstein: Life and work. An Introduction’, in H. Sluga and D. G. Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmuller, S.: 1969, Main Currents in Contemporary German, British, and American Philosophy, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swoyer, C.: 1991, ‘Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning’, Synthese 1987, 449-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F.: 1995, ‘Laws of Nature–Laws of Science’, in F. Weinert (ed.), Laws of Nature. Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Trans.D. F. Pears and B.McGuinness, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

pârvu, I. “Mein Grundgedanke Ist...” The Structural Theory Of Representation As The Metaphysics Of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Synthese 129, 259–274 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013047205576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013047205576

Keywords

Navigation