Skip to main content
Log in

On the Durability of King and Council: The Continuum Between Dictatorship and Democracy

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In practice one rarely observes pure forms of dictatorship that lack a council, or pure forms of parliament that lack an executive. Generally government policies emerge from organizations that combine an executive branch of government, “the king,” with a cabinet or parliamentary branch, “the council.” This paper provides an explanation for this regularity, and also provides an evolutionary model of the emergence of democracy that does not require a revolution. The analysis demonstrates that the bipolar “king and council” constitutional template has a number of properties that gives it great practical efficiency as a method of information processing and as a very flexible institutional arrangement for making collective decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. (1962) The Politics. Translated by T. A. Sinclair. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bély, L. (1998) The History of France. (translated by A. Moyon) Paris: Jean–Paul Giserot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A., and Wintrobe, R. (1975) “The Equilibrium Size of a Budget–Maximizing Bureau: A Note on Niskanen's Theory of Bureaucracy.” Journal of Political Economy 83: 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975) The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1987) “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” American Economic Review 77: 243–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, W. (1972) “Individual Welfare in Anarchy.” In: Tullock, G. (ed.) Explorations in the Theory of Anarchy," Blacksburg, VA: Center for Study of Public Choice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. R., and Schap D. (1987) “Executive Veto, Legislative Override and Structure–Induced Equilibrium.” Public Choice 52: 227–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D. (1989) “Efficient Status Seeking, Externalities and the Evolution of Status Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 11: 175–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D. (2001A) “Rational Ignorance and Rationally Biased Expectations: The Discrete Informational Foundations of Fiscal Illusion.” Public Choice 107: 634–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D. (2001B) Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Interests and Reform. Book manuscript, Center for Study of Public Choice.

  • Congleton, R. D. (1980) “Competitive Process, Competitive Waste, and Institutions.” In: J. Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., and Tullock, G. (eds.) Towards a Theory of the Rent–Seeking Society, pp. 153–79. Texas A and M Press. Reprinted in Congleton, R. D., and Tollison, R. D. (eds.) (1995) The Economic Analysis of Rent Seeking. London: Edgar Elgar Press, pp. 101–27.

  • Dudley, L. (2000) “The Rationality of Revolution.” Economics of Governance 1: 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, L. M. (1991) The Word and the Sword: How Techniques of Information and Violence Have Shaped our World. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985) Choosing the Right Pond, Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F. (1995) Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1959) Leviathan. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, E., Stjernquist, N. (1995) Constitutional Documents of Sweden. Stockholm: The Swedish Riksdag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1989) “Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution.” Public Choice 61: 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvy, R. (1976) “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mommsen, W. J. (1995) Imperial Germany 1867–1918. (Translation of Der Autoritäre Nationalstaat, by R. Deveson) New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. O. (ed.) (1997) The Oxford Illustrated History of Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (1989) Public Choice II. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1969) “Nonmarket Decision–making: The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 59: 293–305

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1987) “Institutions, Transactions Costs and Economic Growth.” Economic Inquiry 25: 419–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., and Weingast, B. R. (1989) “Institutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing, Public Choice in Seventeenth–Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49: 803–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. R., and Colton, J. (1965) A History of the Modern World. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, O. (1994) The Government and Politics of Nordic Countries. Translated by F. G. Perry. Stockholm: CE Fritzes AB (Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schap, D. (1986) “Executive Veto and Informational Strategy: A Structure Induced Equilibrium Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 755–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. R., and Gatzke, H. W. (1978) The Mainstream of Civilization. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987) Autocracy. Dordrecht: Marinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (1999a) “Breaking with the Notion of Social Contract: Constitutions as Based on Spontaneously Arisen Institutions.” Constitutional Political Economy 10: 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (1999b) Explaining Constitutional Change: A Positive Economics Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verney, D. V. (1957) Parliamentary Reform in Sweden 1866–1921. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. (1993) Swedish History in Outline. The Swedish Institute. Translated by P. B. Austin.

  • Wintrobe, R. (1998) The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Congleton, R.D. On the Durability of King and Council: The Continuum Between Dictatorship and Democracy. Constitutional Political Economy 12, 193–215 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011605310916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011605310916

Keywords

Navigation