Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Four varieties of comparative analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article starts by examining the definition of comparative analysis and what distinguishes it from analysis in general. It then identifies four varieties of comparative analysis according to (a) whether they aim to explain differences or similarities and (b) the assumptions they make about the underlying causal patterns present. While the former contrast is well known, it is argued that the latter contrast is fundamental and opens up many possible avenues for comparative analysis, which would otherwise be closed. Although the examples are drawn from the housing and urban studies field, the argument is of general applicability. The article considers in turn what is meant by comparative analysis, its main varieties, the research designs needed to undertake it, and some of the problems that arise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boudon, R. (1967) L'analyse mathematique des faits sociaux, Plon, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1974) The Logic of Sociological Explanation, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.R. and Nagel, E. (1934) An Introduction to Logic and ScientificMethod, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.A. (1971) Elementary Survey Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1959) Some statistical problems in research design, American Sociological Review, 24, 328-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M.L. (1987) Cross-national research as an analytical strategy, American Sociological Review,52, 713-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955) The interpretation of statistical relations, In: The Language of Social Research (Eds, Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Rosenberg, M.), Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 115-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1992) Small N's and big conclusions: An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases, In: What is a Case? (Eds, Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 105-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1994) More on the uneasy case for using Mill-type methods in small-N comparative studies, Social Forces,72, 1225-1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (1982) Determinants of housing policy in West Germany and the U.S., In: Urban Policy Under Capitalism (Eds, Fainstein, N.I. and Fainstein, S.S.), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 83-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1886) A System of Logic, Longmans Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J.C. (1983) Case and situational analysis, Sociological Review,31, 187-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J.M. (1999) Conjecture, comparison and conditional theory in macrosocial inquiry, American Journal of Sociology,105, 781-800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickvance, C.G. (1986) Comparative urban analysis and assumptions about causality, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,10, 162-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickvance, C.G. (1995) Comparative analysis, causality and case studies in urban studies, In: The Urban Context (Eds, Rogers, A. and Vertovec, S.), Berg, Oxford, pp. 35-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickvance, C.G. (1999) Democratisation and the decline of social movements: The effects of regime change on collective action in Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Latin America, Sociology,33, 353-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C.C. (1987) The Comparative Method, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C.C. (1992) Introduction: Cases of ‘What is a Case?’ In: What is a Case? (Eds, Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-17.

  • Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S. (Eds.) (1992) What is a Case? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1992) Method in Social Science (Second edition), Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szelenyi, I. (1983) Urban Inequalities under State Socialism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1984) Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. (1992) Making the theoretical case, In: What is a Case? (Eds, Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 121-137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NY, U.K.

    Christopher G. Pickvance

Authors
  1. Christopher G. Pickvance
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pickvance, C.G. Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16, 7–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011533211521

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011533211521

Search

Navigation