This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Benatar SR. Imperialism, research ethics and global health. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998; 24: 221–22. Fairchild A L, Bayer R. Uses and abuses of Tuskegee. Science 1999; 284: 919–21.
Benatar SR. Just healthcare beyond individualism: challenges for North American bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1997; 6: 397–415.
Iglehart J. American health services: expenditure. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 340: 70–76.
Bloom B. The future of public health. Nature 1999; 402: Supp C63–C64.
Investing in health research and development. Report of the ad hoc committee on health research relating to future intervention options, Geneva: WHO, 1996.
World Health Report: fighting disease, fostering development. Geneva: WHO, 1996.
Building a world community: globalisation and the common good. Danish Foreign Ministry, 2000. Falk R. Predatory Globalisation: a critique. Polity Press Cambridge, 1999. Alexander T. Unravelling global apartheid: an overview of world politics. Polity Press Cambridge UK, 1996. Benatar S R. Global disparities in health and human rights: a critical commentary. American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88: 295–300.
Lee K and Zwi AB et al. A global political economy approach to AIDS: ideology, interests and implications. New Political Economy 1996; 1: 355–373. McNeil W H. Plagues and peoples. Anchor Books. New York, 1998.
Benatar SR. Prospects for global health: lessons from tuberculosis. Thorax 1995; 50: 489–91.
McNeil WH. Plague and peoples. Anchor Books. New York, 1998.
Benatar SR and Singer PA et al. A new look at international research ethics. BritMed J. 2000; 321: 824–26.
Pilling D. Winning the drugs war. Financial Times, 13 April 1999. Angell M. The pharmaceutical industry – to whom is it accountable? New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 352: 1902–1904.
Chetley A. A health business? world health and the pharmaceutical industry. Zed Books. London, 1990.
Gardels N. The post-Atlantic capitalist order. New Perspectives Quarterly Spring; 1993: 2–3.
Geneva: WHO, 1999, see note 3.
Marshall PA. Final Report: the relevance of culture for informed consent in US funded international health research. Consultation Report: President's National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Marshall P A. CIOMS Report: Cultural influences on communication and the protection of confidentiality: informed consent in international health research.
Daugherty CK, Kiolbasa TA and Siegler M et al. Informed consent in clinical research: a study of cancer patient understanding of consent forms and alternatives of care in phase 1 clinical trials. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 16, 1997, A188. Daugherty CK, Ratian M J and Gowchowski E et al. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase 1 trials. J. Clin. Oncology 1195; 13(5): 1062–72. Grunder TM. On the readability of surgical consent. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980; 302: 900–902. LoVerde ME, Prochazka AV and Byyny RL et al. Research consent forms: continued unreadability and increasing length. J. General Internal Medicine 1989; 4(5): 41–12.
Kass NE, Sugarman J and Faden R et al. Trust: the fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Centre Report 1996; 26(5): 25–29.
Kahn JP, Mastroianni AC & Sugarman J (Eds). Beyond consent: seeking justice in research. Oxford University Press. New York, 1998.
Violence in research. Bebe Loff. Lancet 2000; 355: 1806.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benatar, S.R. Distributive Justice and Clinical Trials in the Third World. Theor Med Bioeth 22, 169–176 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011419820440
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011419820440