Skip to main content
Log in

The Archaeology of the Disenfranchised

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of multivocality has been much explored and debated in recent archaeological publications. Clearly, the objective of such work is to assure the inclusion of the views of disadvantaged minorities and disenfranchised peoples in the presentation of their own pasts. This objective has not been achieved with much success, however, partly because mainstream archaeologists have had some difficulties in grappling with what appear to be a proliferation of “alternative” archaeological theories. Few discussions have approached alternative archaeologies as constituting a definable archaeological paradigm that might be termed “The Archaeology of the Disenfranchised.” Four different models within this paradigm are discussed and a strategy for a more widespread inclusion of alternative archaeological discussions and projects is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Abu El-Haj, N. (1998). Translating truths: Nationalism, the practice of archaeology, and the remaking of contemporary Jerusalem. American Ethnologist 25: 166–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, A. (2000). Bury my heart at wounded tree. Paper presented at the Conference on the Transmission and Assimilation of Culture in the Near East (TAC 2000), Council for British Research in the Levant, Jerusalem.

  • Agbe-Davis, A. (1999). The legacy of “race” in African-American archaeology: A silk purse from a wolf's ear? Paper presented at the Fourth World Archaeological Congress, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

  • Amichai, Y. (1988). All the generations before me (H. Schimmel, Trans.), Poems of Jerusalem, Harper and Row, New York, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anawak, J. (1989). Inuit perceptions of the past. In Layton, R. (ed.) Who Needs the Past: Indigenous Values and Archaeology, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B. (1990). The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity 64: 464–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assante, M. (1987). The Afrocentric Idea, Temple University, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrani, Z. (1998). Conjuring Mesopotamia: Imaginative geography and a world past. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandaranayake, S. (1995). Monastery plan and social formation: The spatial organization of the Buddhist monastery complexes of the Early and Middle Historical period in Sri Lanka and changing patterns of political power. In Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (eds.), Domination and Resistance, One World Archaeology Series, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. (1978). Gatherer–hunter to farmer: A social perspective. World Archaeology 10: 204–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. (1985). Emergent tribal formations on the American mid-continent. American Antiquity 50: 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender,B. (1993). Cognitive archaeology and cultural materialism. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3(2): 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim, E., and Margalit, Z. (2000). Masada. Getty Conservation Institute Workshop on Archaeological Site management in the Eastern Mediterranean, May 19, 2000, Corinth, Greece.

  • Bernal, M. (1975). Chinese Socialism to 1907, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. (1987). Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. Vol. 1: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785–1985, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. (2000). Afrocentrism and two historical models for the foundation of ancient Greece. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biko, F. (2000). The African data on ancient Egyptian archetypes. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Bond, G., and Gilliam, A. (1994). Power/knowledge. In Bond, G. and Gilliam, A. (eds.), Social Construction of the Past: Representation As Power, Routledge, London, pp. 78–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, G. (1999). The exilic imagination. In Abu-Lughod, I., Heacock, R., and Nashef, K. (eds.), The Landscape of Palestine: Equivocal Poetry, Birzeit University Publications, Birzeit-Palestine, pp. 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (1970). Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, Henry Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (1994). Seeing stars: Character and identity in the landscapes of modern Macedonia. Antiquity 68(261): 784–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1996). On resisting resistance. American Anthropologist 98(4): 729–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K.(1998). Contests of heritage and the politics of preservation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. (1995). Factional competition in complex society. In Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (eds.), Domination and Resistance, One World Archaeology Series, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. (2000). On the archaeology of choice: Agency studies as a research strategem. In Dobres, M., and Robb, E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, P. (1994). Dependent development in the United States South. In Bond, G., and Gilliam, A. (eds.), Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power, Routledge, London, pp. 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1987). The Americanization Syndrom: A Quest for Conformity, Unwin Hayman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, Q. (1996). In the Museum of Maya Culture: Touring Chichen Itza, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castile, G. (1996). The commodification of Indian identity. American Anthropologist 98(4), pp. 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, I. (1996). Signs of silence, lines of listening. In Curti, L., and Chambers, I. (eds.), The Post-Colonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons, Routledge, London, pp. 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (2000). A better explanation of hereditary inequality. In Dobres, M., and Robb, E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., and Blake, M. (1994). The power of prestige: Competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In Brumfiel, E., and Fox, J. (eds.), Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., and Torrence, R. (eds.). (2000). The Archaeology of Difference, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condori, C. (1989). History and pre-history in Bolivia: What about the Indians? In Layton, R. (ed.), Conflicts in the Archaeology of Living Traditions, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M., and Gero, J. (1991). Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: And introduction to Women and Prehistory. In Gero, J., and Conkey, M. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M., and Gero, J. (1997). Programme to practice: Gender and feminism in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 411–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwish, M. (1974). A lover from Palestine. Splinters of Bone (B. M. Bannani, Trans.), Greenfield Review Press, Greenfield Center, New York, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, P. (1998). Playing Indian, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever,W. (1999). Can ‘Biblical Archaeology’ be an academic and professional discipline. In Kapitan, T. (ed.), Archaeology, History and Culture in Palestine and the Near East: Essays in Memory of Albert E. Glock, Scholars Press, Atlanta, pp. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diop, C. (1974). The African Origins of Civilization: Myth or Reality (M. Cook, Trans.), Lawrence Hill Books, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M. (1995). Gender and prehistoric technology: On the social agency of technical strategies, World Archaeology 27(1): 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M., and Robb, J. (2000). Agency in archaeology. In Dobres, M., and Robb, E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowson, T. (2000). Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In Thomas, J. (ed.) Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, Leicester University Press, London and New York, pp. 283–289. (First published 1998. Cota Zero 14: 81–87, original in Catalan.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, G. (1998). Adventures in the colored museum: Afrocentrism, memory, and the construction of race. American Anthropologist 100(3): 703–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, A. (2000). A Commodity or a Threat?: Imported Pottery in the Iron Age II. Paper presented at the Conference on the Transmission and Assimilation of Culture in the Near East (TAC 2000), Council for British Research in the Levant, Jerusalem.

  • Flannery, K. (1999). Process and agency in early state formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folorunso, C. (2000). Egypt: As viewed from West Africa. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Franklin, M. (1997). “Power to the people”: Sociopolitics and the archaeology of black Americans. Historical Archaeology 31(3): 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (1998). Comments on “perspectives on the evolution of African American culture: The historical archaeology of the tenant community at the Levi Jordan Plantation. Paper presented at the Society of Historical Archaeology Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Gellner, E. (1995). Interpretive anthropology. In Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Lastand J., and Lucas, G. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. (1993). The social world of prehistoric facts: Gender and power in Paleoindian research. In Du Cros, H., and Smith, L. (eds.), Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, Australian National University, Canberra, pp. 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. (1995). Railroading epistemology: Paleoindians and women. In Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Lastand, J., and Lucas, G. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. (2000). Troubled travels in agency and feminism. In Dobres, M., and Robb, E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J., and Root, D. (1990). Public presentations and private concerns: Archaeology in the pages of National Geographic. In Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.), The Politics of the Past, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, A. (1999). Cultural bias in archaeology. In Kapitan, T. (ed.), Archaeology, History and Culture in Palestine and the Near East: Essays in Memory of Albert E. Glock, Scholars Press, Atlanta, pp. 324–342. (original work published 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, A. (1999). Archaeology as cultural survival: The future of the Palestinian past. In Kapitan, T. (ed.), Archaeology, History and Culture in Palestine and the Near East: Essays in Memory of Albert E. Glock, Scholars Press, Atlanta, pp. 343–365. (original work published 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossen, G. (1996). Maya Zapatistas move to the ancient future. American Anthropologist 98(3): 528–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. (1981). The Irish Americans: The Rise to Money and Power, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haikal, F. (2000). Egypt's past regenerated by its own people. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Halperin, D. (1995). Saint=Foucault: Towads a Gay Hagiography, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (1999). La trahision archeologues? Archaeological practice as intellectual activity in postmodernity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 12(1): 60–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis,Y., and Yalouri, E. (1996). Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society. Antiquity 70(267): 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, F. (1998). Memorabilia: Archaeological materiality and national identity in Egypt. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology UnderFire: Nationalism,Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. (1998). Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5(1): 99–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1992). Introduction. In Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, J. (eds.), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1992). Theory and Practice in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1998). The past as passion and play: Catalhoyuk as a site of conflict in the construction of multiple pasts. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 124–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1999). The Archaeological Process: An Introduction, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, and Malden, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (2000). (ed.). Towards a Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example of Catalhoyuk. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, Monograph No. 28.

  • Hoffman, E. (1998). Shtetl: The Life and Death of a Small Town and theWorld of Polish Jews, Houghton Mifflin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, S. (1998). Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes, Verson, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatiev, N. (1995). How the Irish Became White, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1996). Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1988). Marxism and historicism. In The Ideology of Theories: Essays 1971–1986. Vol. 2: The Syntax of History, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1989). Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (1997). Conquests of the imagination: Maya-Mexican polarity and the story of Chichen-Itza. American Anthropologist 99(2): 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalidi, W. (1992). All That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Destroyed by Israel in 1948, Institute for Palestine Studies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khpera, S. (2000). Ancient Egypt: Africa's stolen legacy. New African October: 18–25.

  • Kohl, P. (1993). Limits to a post-processual archaeology (or, the dangers of a new scholasticism). In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P. (1995). The material culture of the modern era in the ancient Orient: Suggestions for future work. In Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (eds.), Domination and Resistance, One World Archaeology Series, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsakis, K. (1998). The past is ours: Images of Greek Macedonia. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 44–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kus, S. (2000). Ideas like burgeoning grains on a young rice stalk: Some ideas on theory in anthropological Archaeology. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, Foundations of Archaeological Inquiry Series, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, pp. 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kus, S., and Rharijaona, V. (2000). House to palace, village to state: Scaling up architecture and ideology, American Anthropologist 102(1): 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, R. (ed.). (1989). Conflicts in the Archaeology of Living Traditions, Unwin Hayman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, M. (1995). Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, M., and Rogers, G. (1996). Black Athena Revisited, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. (1992). A multicultural African-American historical archaeology: Howto place archaeology in the community in a state capital. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Leone, M. (1995). A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist 97(2): 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M., Mullins, P., Creveling, M., Hurst, L., Jackson-Nash, B., Jones, L., Kaiser, H., Logan, G., and Warner, M. (1995). Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? In Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Lastand, J., and Lucas, G. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M., Potter, P., and Shackel, P. (1987). Toward a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology 28: 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1989). Conclusions. In Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.), The Politics of the Past, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1995). 'Trojan forebears', ‘peerless relics': The rhetoric of heritage claims. In Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Lastand, J., and Lucas, G. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K. (1998). Archaeology, language and the peopling of West Africa: A consideration of the evidence. In Blench, R., and Spriggs, M. (eds.), Archaeology and Language II: Archaeological Data and Linguistic Hypotheses, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K. (2000). Cheikh Anta Diop and Egypt in Africa. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Matos Moctezuma, E. (1992). The Aztec main pyramid: Ritual architecture at Tenochtitlan. In Townsend, R. (ed.), The Ancient Americas from Sacred Landscapes, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDavid, C. (1997). Descendants, decisions and power: The public interpretation of the archaeology of the Levi Jordan Plantation. Historical Archaeology 31(3): 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDavid, C. (1999). Contemporary conversations about the archaeology of slavery and tenancy: Collaboration, descendants and computers. Paper presented at the Fourth World Archaeological Congress, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

  • Memmi, A. (1965). The Colonizer and the Colonized (trans.), Orion Press, New York. (original work published 1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (1998). Introduction: Archaeology matters. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1980). Archaeology and development. Current Anthropology 21(6): 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (eds.). (1995). Domination and Resistance, One World Archaeology Series, Routledge, London and New York. (First published 1989. Unwin Hayman, London.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.). (1984). Ideology, Power and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1997). The fiesta of the word: The Zapatista uprising and radical democracy in Mexico. American Anthropologist 99(2): 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J. (2000). Attributing colour to the ancient Egyptians. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Nur el-Din, H. (2000). Domestic architecture as a reflection of the inter-relationships between different groups. Paper presented at the Conference on the Transmission and Assimilation of Culture in the Near East (TAC 2000), Council for British Research in the Levant, Jerusalem.

  • Orser, C. (1992). Beneath the material surface of things: Commodities, artifacts and slave plantations. Historical Archaeology 26(3): 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C. (1998). The challenge of race to American historical archaeology. American Anthropologist 100(3): 661–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C. (1999). Historical archaeology in Ireland: History of the Ballykilcline project. Available: http://www.ilstu.edu/»ceorser/ballykilcline.htm. (Webpage of the Centre for the Study of Rural Ireland.)

  • Ozdogan, M. (1998). Ideology and archaeology in Turkey. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology UnderFire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T. (1996). Conceptual differences between Mexican and Peruvian archaeology. American Anthropologist 98(3): 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. (2000). The tragedy of the commoners. In Dobres, M., and Robb, E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 113–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R. (1994). Afro-Americans in the Massachusetts historical landscape. In Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.), The Politics of the Past, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 142–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R. (1997). Du Boisian perspectives on identities and material culture. Anthropology Newsletter 38(5): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R., and McGuire, R. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: Material culture, domination, and resistance. In McGuire, R., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R., and Hodder, I. (1999). Communicating present pasts. In Preucel, R., and Hodder, I. (eds.), Contemporary Archaeology in Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, Y. (2000). The young men of Gibeon. Eretz 70: 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. M. (1998). Ancient Egypt in America: Claiming the riches. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (1994). The politics of identity in archaeology. In Bond, G., and Gilliam, A. (eds.), Social Construction of the Past: Representation As Power, Routledge, London, pp. 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, W. (1997). The Myth of Rescue: Why the Democracies Could Not Have Saved More Jews from the Nazis, Routledge, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1994). Culture and Imperialism, Vintage Books, New York. (First published 988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1999). Palestine: Memory, invention and space. In Abu-Lughod, I., Heacock, R., and Nashef, K. (eds.), The Landscape of Palestine: Equivocal Poetry, Birzeit University Publications, Birzeit-Palestine, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitta, D. (1994). Agency, class and archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13: 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem, H. (1999). Implications of cultural tradition: The case of Palestinian traditional pottery. In Kapitan, T. (ed.), Archaeology, History and Culture in Palestine and the Near East: Essays in Memory of Albert E. Glock, Scholars Press, Atlanta, pp. 66–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem, H. (2000). Pottery traditions and cultural transmission: A case from traditional Palestinian pottery. Paper presented at the Conference on the Transmission and Assimilation of Culture in the Near East (TAC 2000), sponsored by the Council for British Research in the Levant, Jerusalem.

  • Sayej, G. (1999). The origins of terraces in the central hills of Palestine: Theories and explanations. In Abu-Lughod, I., Heacock, R., and Nashef, K. (eds.), The Landscape of Palestine: Equivocal Poetry, Birzeit University Publications, Birzeit-Palestine, pp. 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and Memory, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scham, S. (1998). Mediating nationalism in archaeology: A matter of trust? American Anthropologist 99(3): 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. (2000). Social theory in archaeology: building bridges. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, Foundations of Archaeological Inquiry Series, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeden, H. (1989). Search for the missing link: Archaeology and the public in Lebanon. In Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.) The Politics of the Past, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 142–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, P. (2000). Craft to wage labor: Agency and resistance in American historical archaeology. In Dobres, M. and Robb, E. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Hodder, I. (1995). Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Lastand, J., and Lucas, G. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, A. (1996). Introduction. In Reinharz, J., and Shapira, A. (eds.), Essential Papers on Zionism, New York University Press, NewYork and London, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (1989). Introduction. In Shennan, S. (ed.), Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, N. A. (1998). Whose game is it anyway? The political and social transformations of American Biblical Archaeology. In Meskell, L. (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. (1991). What this awl means: Toward a feminist archaeology. In Gero, J., and Conkey, M. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 388–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2000). Strange attractors: Feminist theory, nonlinear systems theory, and their implications for archaeological theory. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, Foundations of Archaeological Inquiry Series, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, pp. 112–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, W. (2000). The Parthenon Marbles: Britain's stewardship. Paper presented at the first international conference on the Restitution of the Parthenon Marbles, Athens, Greece.

  • Thomas, J. (2000). Introduction. In Thomas, J. (ed.), Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, Leicester University Press, London and New York, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man 19: 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1989). Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 26: 776–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1995). Romanticism, nationalism and archaeology. In Kohl, P., and Fawcett, C. (eds.), Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (1994). Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucko, P. (1983). Australian academic archaeology: Aboriginal transformation of its aims and practices. Australian Archaeology 16: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizenor, G. (1986). Bone Courts: The rights and narrative representations of tribal bones. American Indian Quarterly 10(4): 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wengrow, D. (2000). Landscapes of knowledge: Archaeology, anthropology and colonialism in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Paper presented at the conference on Encounters with Ancient Egypt, University College London, London.

  • Willett, F. (1994). Museums: Two case studies of reaction to colonialism. In Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.), The Politics of the Past, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1989). Matters of fact and matters of interest. In Shennan, S. (ed.), Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, Unwin Hayman, London, pp. 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1992). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57: 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1993). A proliferation of newarchaeologies: “Beyond objectivism and relativism.” In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yehya, A. (1999). Who was here first?... and does it matter? Paper presented at Who was here first? conference, Yakar Center for Social Concern, Jerusalem.

  • Zedeno, M. N. (2000). On what people make of places: A behavioral cartography. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, Foundations of Archaeological Inquiry Series, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, pp. 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziadeh, G. (1995). Ethno-history and ‘reverse chronology’ at Ti'innik, a Palestinian village. Antiquity 69(266): 999–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziadeh-Seely, G. (1999). Abandonment and site formation processes: An ethnographic and archaeological study. In Kapitan, T. (ed.), Archaeology, History and Culture in Palestine and the Near East: Essays in Memory of Albert E. Glock, Scholars Press, Atlanta, pp. 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scham, S.A. The Archaeology of the Disenfranchised. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 8, 183–213 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011353202603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011353202603

Navigation