Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Pregnancy-Associated Change in Physical Activity in a Rural White Population

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics and exercise prior to pregnancy to change in physical activity (PA) during pregnancy. Methods: This study was part of the Bassett Mothers' Health Project (BMHP), a prospective cohort study of women who enrolled for prenatal care in the Bassett Healthcare system between November 7, 1994, and November 15, 1996. Six hundred twenty-two women met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. Sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics and exercise behavior were assessed prenatally using the medical record and an anonymous mailed questionnaire. Staged linear regression analysis was used to predict change in physical activity with the psychosocial and sociodemographic characteristics as the independent variables and prepregnancy exercise frequency as a control variable. Results: Women who were older, more educated, and had higher household incomes were more likely to exercise prior to pregnancy (p < .05). Change in PA after becoming pregnant was associated with prepregnancy exercise frequency (p < .001). Women who exercised frequently moderated their activity, while sedentary women maintained or increased their PA after becoming pregnant. Exercise self-efficacy (the belief in one's ability to exercise regularly) and body mass index (BMI) were positive predictors of change in PA (p < .05), while prepregnancy exercise frequency remained significant as a control variable. Conclusion: Interventions that aim to help women maintain or increase their PA during the perinatal period should be designed to increase exercise self-efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Blair SN, Kohl HW, Paffenberger RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 1989;262:2395–2401.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clapp JF. The course of labor after endurance exercise during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1799–1805.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dye TD, Knox KL, Artal R, Aubry RH, Wojtowycz MA. Physical activity, obesity and diabetes in pregnancy.Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:961–965.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lombardi W, Wilson S, Peniston JB. Wellness intervention with pregnant soldiers. Mil Med 1999;164:22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcoux S, Brisson J, Fabia J. The effect of leisure time physical activity on the risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1989;43:147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horns PN, Ratcliffe LP, Leggett JC, Swanson MS. Pregnancy outcomes among active and sedentary primiparous women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1996;25:49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koniak-Griffin D. Aerobic exercise, psychological well-being and physical discomforts during adolescent pregnancy. Res Nurs Health 1994;17:253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sternfeld B, Quesenberry, CP, Eskenazi B, Newman LA. Exercise during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:634–640.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clapp JF, Capeless FL. Neonatal morphometrics after endurance exercise during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1805–1811.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clapp JF, Little KD. Effect of recreational exercise on pregnancy weight gain and subcutaneous fat deposition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wallace AM, Boyer DB, Dan A, Holm K. Aerobic exercise, maternal self-esteem, and physical discomforts during pregnancy. J Nurse Midwifery 1986;31:255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Exercise during pregnancy. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1998. ACOG patient Education AP119.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1994. ACOG Technical Bulletin 173.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hatch MC, Shu X-O, McLean DE, Levin B, Begg M, Reuss L, Susser M. Maternal exercise during pregnancy, physical fitness and fetal growth. Am J Epidemiol 1993;137:1105–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rose NC, Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ. Self-rated physical activity level during the second trimester and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:1078–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J, Savitz DA. Exercise during pregnancy among US women. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kendall A, Olson CM, Frongillo EA. Development of psychosocial measures for understanding weight-related behaviors in pregnant women. Ann Behav Med 2001;23:50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saltzer EB. The weight locus of control (WLOC) Scale: A specific measure for obesity research. J Person Assess 1982;46:620–628.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palmer JL, Jennings GE, Massey L. Development of an assessment form: Attitudes toward weight gain during pregnancy. JADA 1985;85:946–949.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hofstetter CR, Sallis JF, Hovell MF. Some health dimensions of self-efficacy: Analysis of theoretical specificity. Soc Sci Med 1990;31:1051–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hemmelgarn BR. The relationship between specified factors and role strain in employed mothers. MSN thesis, University of Saskatchewan, 1990.

  22. Devine CM, Bove CF, Olson CM. Continuity and change in women's weight orientations and lifestyle practices through pregnancy and the postpartum period: The influence of life course trajectories and transitional events. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:567–582.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985;10:141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1993;25:81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sobal J, Rauschenbach BS, Frongillo EA. Marital status, fatness and obesity. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:915–923.

    Google Scholar 

  26. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT software: The FREQ and REG procedures, Version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bild DJ, Jacobes DR, Sidney S, Haskell WL, Anderssen N, Oberman A. Physical activity among young black and white women: The CARDIA study. Ann Epidemiol 1993:3:636–644.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ross CE, Wu C. The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev 1995;60:719–745.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ford ES, Merritt RK, Heath RG, Powell KE, Washburn RA, Kriska A, Haile G. Physical activity behaviors in lower and higher socioeconomic status populations. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:1246–1255.

    Google Scholar 

  30. White CC, Powell KE, Hogelin JC, Gentry EM, Formam MR. The behavioral risk factor surveys: IV. The descriptive epidemiology of exercise. Am J Prev Med 1987;3:304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marcus BH, Pinto BM, Simkin LR, Audrain GE, Taylor ER. Application of theoretical models to exercise behavior among employed women. Am J Health Promotion 1994;9:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McAuley E, Duncan TE, Wraith SC, Lettunich M. Selfefficacy, perceptions of success, and intrinsic motivation. J Appl Soc Psychol 1991;21:139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 1982;37:122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Katula JA, McAuley E, Mihalko SL, Bane SM. Mirror, mirror on the wall... exercise environment influences on self-efficacy. J Soc Behav and Pers 1998;13:319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Poag K, McAuley E. Goal setting, self-efficacy and exercise behavior. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1992;14:352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rodgers WM, Gauvin L. Heterogeneity of incentives for physical activity and self-efficacy in highly active and moderately active women exercisers. J Appl Soc Psychol 1998;28:1016–1029.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hinton, P.S., Olson, C.M. Predictors of Pregnancy-Associated Change in Physical Activity in a Rural White Population. Matern Child Health J 5, 7–14 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011315616694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011315616694

Navigation