Skip to main content
Log in

Expert Advice and Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Work of Douglas Walton

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Appeal to expert judgement has become a wide-spread and unavoidable element in public debates in modern society. The many and fundamental argumentative complications that they raise have not received proportional attention in argumentation studies so far. A prominent exception is a recent book by Douglas Walton, devoted entirely to arguments involving expert opinion (Walton, 1997). Confronting some examples from the field of Science and Society with Walton's earlier work, the need can be traced for a more elaborate and sophisticated treatment of the many issues involved, particularly for the model of information seeking dialogue and the treatment of source reasoning. With these issues as points of reference, it is examined in what way this challenge has been taken up in the new book. A few further additions are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Birrer, Frans A. J.: 1999, 'Client-oriented Anticipation in Expert-advised Problem Solving', in Dorien J. DeTombe and Elmar A. Stuhler (eds.), Complex Problem Solving: Methodological Support for Societal Policy Making, Rainer Hampp Verlag, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrer, Frans A. J. and Rob Pranger: 1995, 'Complex Intertwinements in Argumentation: Some Cases from Discussions on Biotechnology and their Implications for Argumentation Studies', in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.), Special Fields and Cases, Volume IV of the Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, SicSat/International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas: 1996, Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity (Applied Logic Series, volume 1), Kluwer, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1997, Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority, Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N. and Erik C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1990, Practical Reasoning. Goal-driven, Knowledge-based Action-guiding Argumentation, Rowman & Littlefield, Savage (Maryland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1989, Informal Logic. A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birrer, F.A.J. Expert Advice and Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Work of Douglas Walton. Argumentation 15, 267–276 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011171711029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011171711029

Keywords

Navigation