Skip to main content
Log in

Medical Ethics Research Between Theory and Practice

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main object of criticism of present-day medical ethics is the standard view of the relationship between theory and practice. Medical ethics is more than the application of moral theories and principles, and health care is more than the domain of application of moral theories. Moral theories and principles are necessarily abstract, and therefore fail to take account of the sometimes idiosyncratic reality of clinical work and the actual experiences of practitioners. Suggestions to remedy the illnesses of contemporary medical ethics focus on re-establishing the connection between the internal and external morality of medicine. This article discusses the question how to develop a theoretical perspective on medical ethical issues that connects philosophical reflection with the everyday realities of medical practice. Four steps in a comprehensive approach of medical ethics research are distinguished: (1) examine health care contexts in order to obtain a better understanding of the internal morality of these practices; this requires empirical research; (2) analyze and interpret the external morality governing health care practices; sociological study of prevalent values, norms, and attitudes concerning medical-ethical issues is required; (3) creation of new theoretical perspectives on health care practices; Jensen's theory of healthcare practices will be useful here; (4) develop a new conception of bioethics that illuminates and clarifies the complex interaction between the internal and external morality of health care practices. Hermeneutical ethics can be helpful for integrating the experiences disclosed in the empirical ethical studies, as well as utilizing the insights gained from describing the value-contexts of health care practices. For a critical and normative perspective, hermeneutical ethics has to examine and explain the moral experiences uncovered, in order to understand what they tell us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Pellegrino ED. The metamorphosis of medical ethics. A 30-year retrospective. JAMA 1993; 269: 1158–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ten Have HAMJ. The anthropological tradition in the philosophy of medicine. Theor Med 1995; 16: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, e.g., the textbooks of Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994; Gillon R. Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester: Wiley, 1986; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Chichester: Wiley, 1994; Seedhouse D. Ethics. The Heart of Health Care. Chichester: Wiley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, e.g., Doukas DJ. The design and use of the bioethics consultation form. Theor Med 1992; 13: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DuBose ER, Hamel R, O'Connell LJ, eds. A Matter of Principles? Ferment in U.S. Bioethics. Valley Forge: Trinity Press International, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clouser KD, Gert B. A critique of principlism. J Med Philos 1990; 15: 219–236; Holm S. Not just autonomy — the principles of American biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics 1995; 21: 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ten Have HAMJ. The hyperreality of clinical ethics: A unitary theory and hermeneutics. Theor Med 1994; 15: 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barnard D. Reflections of a reluctant clinical ethicist: Ethics consultation and the collapse of critical distance. Theor Med 1992; 13: 15–22; Ten Have HAMJ. Ethiek tussen alliantie en dissidentie. Maastricht: Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DuBose ER et al, 1994. A Matter of Principles? Ferment in U.S. Bioethics. Valley Forge: Trinity Press International

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold RM, Forrow L. Empirical research in medical ethics: an introduction. Theor Med 1993; 14: 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bosk CL. Forgive and Remember. Managing Medical Failure. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bosk CL. All God's Mistakes. Genetic Counseling in a Pediatric Hospital. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zussman R. Intensive Care. Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anspach RR. Deciding Who Lives. Fateful Choices in the Intensive-care Nursery. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bosk CL, 1992: Chapter 1.

  16. Jacobson JA, Kasworm EM, Battin MP, Botkin JR, Francis LP, Green D. Decedents' reported preferences for physician-assisted death: A survey of informants listed on death certificates in Utah. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6: 149–157; Emanuel EJ. Empirical studies on euthanasia and assisted suicide. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6: 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pellegrino ED. The limitations of empirical research in ethics. J Clin Ethics 1995; 6: 161–162.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brody BA. Assessing empirical research in bioethics. Theor Med 1993; 14: 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szawarski Z, Evans D, eds. Solidarity, Justice and Health Care Priorities. Linköping Collaborating Centre, 1993.

  20. Ten Have HAMJ, Spicker SF. Introduction. In: Ten Have HAMJ, Kimsma GK, Spicker SF, eds. The Growth of Medical Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1990: 1–11; Latour B. Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen UJ. Practice and Progress. A Theory for the Modern Health Care System. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, 1987; Jensen UJ. From good medical practice to best medical practice. Int J Health Planning and Management 1989; 4: 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Tongeren PJM. Moral philosophy as a hermeneutics of moral experiences. Int Philos Quarterly 1994; 34: 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Tongeren PJM. The relation of narrativity and hermeneutics to an adequate practical ethic. Ethical Perspectives 1994; 1: 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ten Have, H.A.M.J., Lelie, A. Medical Ethics Research Between Theory and Practice. Theor Med Bioeth 19, 263–276 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009965900818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009965900818

Navigation