Skip to main content
Log in

Normativity and Interpersonal Reasons

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is one who takes normativity seriously to do if normativity can neither be discovered lurking out there in the world independently of us nor can it be sufficiently grasped from a merely explanatory perspective? One option is to accept that the normative challenge cannot be met and to retreat to some form of moral skepticism. Another possibility has recently been proposed by Christine Korsgaard in The Sources of Normativity where she aims to develop an account of normativity which is grounded in autonomy. Furthermore, she argues that on her account reasons are "essentially public" and that this captures how it is that we can obligate one another. In this paper I argue that there is a serious tension between her account of normativity and the publicity of reasons-namely, that if reasons are essentially public, then it is not possible for individuals to legislate laws for themselves. However, I then argue that if we revise her conception of normativity such that it is understood to involve collective rather than individual legislation that it may then be possible to account for interpersonal reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Annas, J., An Introduction to Plato's Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S., Errors and the Phenomenology of Value. Reprinted in: Essays in Quasi-Realism.New York: Oxford University Press, 1993a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S., How to be an Ethical Anti-realist. Reprinted in: Essays in Quasi-Realism.New York: Oxford University Press, 1993b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R., Morality and identity. In: Korsgaard (1996a).

  • Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed., ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, 2nd ed., trans. Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C., The Sources of Normativity.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C., The Reasons We Can Share. Reprinted in: Creating the Kingdom of Ends.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L., Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.London: Penguin, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T., The Possibility of Altruism.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T., Schelling: personal identity and self-command. In: Other Minds.New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 19, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T., Universality and the reflective self. In: Korsgaard (1996a).

  • Nagel, T., The Last Word.New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R., Reasons for Actions.Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Internal and External Reasons. Reprinted in: Moral Luck.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations,2nd ed., trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Day, K. Normativity and Interpersonal Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1, 61–87 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009908512139

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009908512139

Navigation