Skip to main content
Log in

Some Evidence on the Ethical Disposition of Accounting Students: Context and Gender Implications

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

Research into the ethical disposition of students hasbeen popular in recent years. However, research intothe ethical disposition of accounting students inparticular has been sparse. Because of the uniquecharacteristics of those who choose to enter the fieldof accounting, generalizing findings of businessstudents to accounting students may not be valid. Consequently, additional studies of accountingstudents are useful.

This study investigates context (academic vs.business)-based and gender-based differences inaccounting students’ ethical intent. We find mixedsupport for gender-based mean differences; theseresults are consistent across context. With regard tocontext we find a greater variability in respondents’behavioral intent in an academic context relative toa business context. We also find gender-baseddifferences in how ethical issues are grouped (thatis, the perceived cognitive structure of ethicalissues). Implications of these findings are discussedwith particular interest relative to education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ameen, E., D. Guffey and J. McMillan: 1996, ‘Gender Differences in Determining the Ethical Sensitivity of Future Accounting Professionals’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Accounting Association Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (AAA): 1986, ‘Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession’, Issues in Accounting Education, 168–195.

  • Arens, A. A. and J. K. Loebecke: 1994, Auditing: An Integrated Approach, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. Shepard: 1989, ‘Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 3, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. C. and Y. J. Urgas: 1998, “Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1117–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., L. Pant and D. Sharp: 1998, ‘The Effect of Gender and Academic Discipline Diversity on the Ethical Evaluations, Ethical Intentions and Ethical Orientation of Potential Public Accounting Recruits’, Accounting Horizons 12(3), 250–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daidone, J.: 1992, The Supply of Accounting Graduates and the Demand for Public Accounting Recruits, AICPA, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirsmith, M. and E. Ketz: 1987, ‘A Fifty-Cent Test: An Approach to Teaching Integrity’, Advances in Accounting 5 (ed. B.N. Schwartz), 129–144.

  • Fulmer, W. E. and B. R. Cargile: 1987, ‘Ethical Perceptions of Accounting Students: Does Exposure to a Code of Professional Ethics Help?’, Issues in Accounting Education, 207–219.

  • Geiger and O'Connell: 1999, ‘Accounting Student Ethical Perceptions: An Analysis of Training and Gender Effects’, Teaching Business Ethics, 371–388.

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’ Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. and J. Weber: 1997, ‘Influencing Ethical Development Exposing Students to the AICPA Code of Conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 777–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, M., S. E. Loeb and R. D. Neary: 1985, Auditing: A Risk Analysis Approach, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C. T., G. Foster and S. M. Datar: 1998, Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieso, D. E. and J. J. Weygandt: 1998, Intermediate Accounting, 9th edn., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. C.: 1993, Contemporary Auditing Issues and Cases, West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1984, Essays on Moral Development, Harper and Row, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E.: 1991, ‘The Evaluation of “Outcomes” of Accounting Ethics Education’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K. and B. L. Peery: 1996, ‘Selected Individual Differences and Collegians’ Ethical Beliefs’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meigs, W. B., E. J. Larsen and R. F. Meigs: 1977, Principles of Auditing, 6th edn., Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. M.: 1990, Cases in Accounting Ethics and Professionalism, 1st edn., McGraw Hill Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. M.: 1997, Cases in Accounting Ethics and Professionalism, 3rd edn., McGraw Hill Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Treadway Commission): 1987, Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting.

  • Schwartz, F.: 1996, ‘The Competitive Advantage: Recruiting and Retaining Women Accountants’, Journal of Accountancy (February), 39–41.

  • Stanga, K. and R. Turpen: 1991, ‘Ethical Judgments on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, T.: 1990, ‘Believing that Everyone Else is Less Ethical: Implications for Work Behavior and Ethics Instruction’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 715–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windal, F. W.: 1991, Ethics and the Accountant: Text and Cases (Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coate, C.J., Frey, K.J. Some Evidence on the Ethical Disposition of Accounting Students: Context and Gender Implications. Teaching Business Ethics 4, 379–404 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009827807550

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009827807550

Navigation